首页 > 最新文献

Neuromodulation最新文献

英文 中文
Field H1 of Forel vs Subthalamic Nucleus Electrical Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: Long-term Effects on Motor Symptoms and Quality of Life. 帕金森病福尔核与丘脑下核电刺激的场 H1:对运动症状和生活质量的长期影响
IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2024.09.473
Juliana Passinho Azevedo Rodrigues, Maria Sheila Guimarães Rocha, Kaito Alves Carvalho Laube, Ricardo Iglesio, Paulo Roberto Terzian Filho, Julian Letícia de Freitas, Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo, Carlos Gilberto Carlotti, Diogo Coutinho Soriano, Fábio Godinho

Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) relieves motor symptoms, including levodopa-responsive gait disorders in Parkinson's disease (PD). Traditionally, STN-DBS is not indicated to treat severe, clinically resistant axial symptoms. In this scenario, field H1 of Forel (FF) stimulation (FF-DBS) is likely a feasible option, given it improves motor symptoms, including freezing of gait (FOG), as shown by a short-term study. However, no data are available about the long-term effects of this therapy. Finally, no study has compared the long-term effects of FF and STN-DBS.

Objective: We report the long-term outcome (>five years) of bilateral FF-DBS in patients with PD. We also compare the effects of FF-DBS and STN-DBS on motor symptoms, cognition, and quality of life.

Materials and methods: We studied 22 patients (ten with FF-DBS and 12 with STN-DBS). Motor symptoms, cognition, quality of life, and gait symptoms were assessed using the motor part of the Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS III), the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale, the 39-item PD quality of life (PDQ-39), and the FOG questionnaire (FOG score) respectively. The levodopa equivalent daily dose was recorded. Comparisons of the FF and STN-DBS results were conducted.

Result: The mean follow-up was 6.18 years (95% CI: 5.57-6.78). Compared with the preoperative period, patients with FF had an average reduction of 32.2% in the MDS-UPDRS III scores (p < 0.01), a decrease of 35.3% in the FOG scores (p < 0.01), and an improvement of 25.9% in the PDQ-39 (p < 0.01). There was a 7.5% decrease in cognition (p < 0.01). Levodopa equivalent dose (LED) was reduced by 26.3% (p < 0.01). The STN group had an average reduction of 39.4% in the MDS-UPDRS III scores (p < 0.01), a decrease of 23.7% in the FOG scores (p < 0.01), and an improvement of 33.2% in the PDQ-39 scores (p < 0.01). Cognition decreased by 1.6% (p < 0.01) and LED by 15.06% (p = 0.02). Patients with FF-DBS were older than those with STN-DBS at the time of surgery: 61.2 years and 55.7 years, respectively (p = 0.02), and had longer duration of disease (p = 0.02). Patients with FF-DBS had a greater reduction in FOG (p = 0.02) than did the STN group and presented with a greater decrease in cognition (p < 0.01) after five years. STN-DBS had a greater effect on quality of life.

Conclusions: Both FF-DBS and STN-DBS relieved motor symptoms and improved quality of life over a long-term period. Patients with FF-DBS had a higher reduction in both FOG and in LED than did those with STN-DBS. These data support our hypothesis that FF-DBS is a safe and efficient option for treating motor symptoms in PD, including FOG in advanced stages.

背景:眼下核(STN)深部脑刺激(DBS)可缓解帕金森病(PD)患者的运动症状,包括左旋多巴反应性步态障碍。传统上,STN-DBS 并不适用于治疗严重的、有临床耐药性的轴向症状。在这种情况下,福尔场 H1(FF)刺激(FF-DBS)可能是一种可行的选择,因为短期研究显示,它可以改善运动症状,包括步态冻结(FOG)。然而,目前还没有关于该疗法长期效果的数据。最后,还没有研究对 FF 和 STN-DBS 的长期效果进行比较:我们报告了双侧 FF-DBS 对帕金森病患者的长期疗效(>5 年)。我们还比较了 FF-DBS 和 STN-DBS 对运动症状、认知和生活质量的影响:我们研究了 22 位患者(10 位接受了 FF-DBS 治疗,12 位接受了 STN-DBS 治疗)。运动症状、认知、生活质量和步态症状分别使用运动障碍协会统一帕金森病评定量表(MDS-UPDRS III)运动部分、马蒂斯痴呆评定量表、39项帕金森病生活质量(PDQ-39)和FOG问卷(FOG评分)进行评估。此外,还记录了左旋多巴的等效日剂量。对FF和STN-DBS的结果进行了比较:平均随访时间为 6.18 年(95% CI:5.57-6.78)。与术前相比,FF 患者的 MDS-UPDRS III 评分平均降低了 32.2%(P < 0.01),FOG 评分降低了 35.3%(P < 0.01),PDQ-39 改善了 25.9%(P < 0.01)。认知能力下降了 7.5%(p < 0.01)。左旋多巴等效剂量 (LED) 减少了 26.3%(p < 0.01)。STN 组的 MDS-UPDRS III 评分平均降低了 39.4%(p < 0.01),FOG 评分降低了 23.7%(p < 0.01),PDQ-39 评分提高了 33.2%(p < 0.01)。认知能力下降了1.6%(p < 0.01),发光二极管下降了15.06%(p = 0.02)。手术时,FF-DBS 患者的年龄比 STN-DBS 患者大:分别为61.2岁和55.7岁(p = 0.02),病程更长(p = 0.02)。与 STN 组相比,FF-DBS 患者的 FOG 减少幅度更大(p = 0.02),五年后认知能力下降幅度更大(p < 0.01)。STN-DBS对生活质量的影响更大:结论:FF-DBS和STN-DBS都能缓解运动症状,长期改善生活质量。与 STN-DBS 相比,FF-DBS 患者的 FOG 和 LED 下降幅度更大。这些数据支持了我们的假设,即FF-DBS是治疗帕金森病运动症状(包括晚期FOG)的一种安全有效的选择。
{"title":"Field H1 of Forel vs Subthalamic Nucleus Electrical Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: Long-term Effects on Motor Symptoms and Quality of Life.","authors":"Juliana Passinho Azevedo Rodrigues, Maria Sheila Guimarães Rocha, Kaito Alves Carvalho Laube, Ricardo Iglesio, Paulo Roberto Terzian Filho, Julian Letícia de Freitas, Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo, Carlos Gilberto Carlotti, Diogo Coutinho Soriano, Fábio Godinho","doi":"10.1016/j.neurom.2024.09.473","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurom.2024.09.473","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) relieves motor symptoms, including levodopa-responsive gait disorders in Parkinson's disease (PD). Traditionally, STN-DBS is not indicated to treat severe, clinically resistant axial symptoms. In this scenario, field H1 of Forel (FF) stimulation (FF-DBS) is likely a feasible option, given it improves motor symptoms, including freezing of gait (FOG), as shown by a short-term study. However, no data are available about the long-term effects of this therapy. Finally, no study has compared the long-term effects of FF and STN-DBS.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We report the long-term outcome (>five years) of bilateral FF-DBS in patients with PD. We also compare the effects of FF-DBS and STN-DBS on motor symptoms, cognition, and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We studied 22 patients (ten with FF-DBS and 12 with STN-DBS). Motor symptoms, cognition, quality of life, and gait symptoms were assessed using the motor part of the Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS III), the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale, the 39-item PD quality of life (PDQ-39), and the FOG questionnaire (FOG score) respectively. The levodopa equivalent daily dose was recorded. Comparisons of the FF and STN-DBS results were conducted.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The mean follow-up was 6.18 years (95% CI: 5.57-6.78). Compared with the preoperative period, patients with FF had an average reduction of 32.2% in the MDS-UPDRS III scores (p < 0.01), a decrease of 35.3% in the FOG scores (p < 0.01), and an improvement of 25.9% in the PDQ-39 (p < 0.01). There was a 7.5% decrease in cognition (p < 0.01). Levodopa equivalent dose (LED) was reduced by 26.3% (p < 0.01). The STN group had an average reduction of 39.4% in the MDS-UPDRS III scores (p < 0.01), a decrease of 23.7% in the FOG scores (p < 0.01), and an improvement of 33.2% in the PDQ-39 scores (p < 0.01). Cognition decreased by 1.6% (p < 0.01) and LED by 15.06% (p = 0.02). Patients with FF-DBS were older than those with STN-DBS at the time of surgery: 61.2 years and 55.7 years, respectively (p = 0.02), and had longer duration of disease (p = 0.02). Patients with FF-DBS had a greater reduction in FOG (p = 0.02) than did the STN group and presented with a greater decrease in cognition (p < 0.01) after five years. STN-DBS had a greater effect on quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both FF-DBS and STN-DBS relieved motor symptoms and improved quality of life over a long-term period. Patients with FF-DBS had a higher reduction in both FOG and in LED than did those with STN-DBS. These data support our hypothesis that FF-DBS is a safe and efficient option for treating motor symptoms in PD, including FOG in advanced stages.</p>","PeriodicalId":19152,"journal":{"name":"Neuromodulation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142624301","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Seeking Optimal Montage for Single-Pair Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Using Bayesian Optimization and Hyperband-A Feasibility Study. 利用贝叶斯优化和超宽带寻求单对经颅直流电刺激的最佳蒙太奇--可行性研究
IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2024.09.475
Cheolki Im, Jongseung Lee, Donghyeon Kim, Sung Chan Jun, Hyeon Seo

Objectives: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is an emerging neuromodulation technique. The effect of tDCS can vary significantly depending on electrode position and current intensity, making it crucial to find an optimized tDCS montage. However, because of the high computational load, most tDCS optimization approaches have been performed with a limited number of candidates for electrode positions, such as 10-10 or 10-20 international channel configurations. This study introduced the Bayesian optimization and hyperband (BOHB) method to seek optimal tDCS montage for the entire human scalp without conventional constraints.

Materials and methods: The BOHB method is a probabilistic approach that iteratively refines the selection of the optimal montage on the basis of previous results. To determine the suitability of this approach for tDCS simulation, we compared it with random search, which randomly selects montages, and greedy search, which, considers all candidates. Next, the conditions in the greedy search were used as the initial conditions for BOHB for fast learning. The objective function of tDCS optimization was set to maximize the average electric field norm (|E|) in the region of interest (ROI), which is the motor area (M1) and left dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex.

Results: The BOHB method performed better than the conventional random search for the same number of iterations in both ROIs. For M1, the iteration index yielding the maximum evaluation metric in each trial was statistically smaller in the BOHB method than in the random search (p < 0.0001). Regarding the normalized |E|, the BOHB method showed a higher normalized |E| than did the random search for the M1 region.

Conclusions: The BOHB method performed better than did the random search approach. Thus, the BOHB method is feasible for tDCS optimization and can be used as an optimal stimulation montage seeker by fine-tuning some control parameters.

目的:经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是一种新兴的神经调控技术。tDCS 的效果会因电极位置和电流强度的不同而有显著差异,因此找到优化的 tDCS 组合至关重要。然而,由于计算量大,大多数 tDCS 优化方法都是在有限的候选电极位置(如 10-10 或 10-20 国际通道配置)下进行的。本研究引入了贝叶斯优化和超带(BOHB)方法,在没有传统限制的情况下寻求整个人体头皮的最佳 tDCS 蒙太奇:贝叶斯优化和超宽带方法是一种概率方法,可在先前结果的基础上迭代改进最佳蒙太奇的选择。为了确定这种方法是否适用于 tDCS 模拟,我们将其与随机搜索(随机选择蒙太奇)和贪婪搜索(考虑所有候选蒙太奇)进行了比较。接下来,贪婪搜索中的条件被用作 BOHB 的初始条件,以实现快速学习。tDCS 优化的目标函数设定为最大化感兴趣区(ROI)的平均电场规范(|E|),感兴趣区为运动区(M1)和左侧背外侧前额叶皮层:在两个 ROI 中,迭代次数相同时,BOHB 方法的性能优于传统的随机搜索。对于 M1,BOHB 方法在每次试验中产生最大评价指标的迭代指数在统计学上小于随机搜索(P < 0.0001)。关于归一化|E|,在 M1 区域,BOHB 方法比随机搜索显示出更高的归一化|E|:结论:BOHB 方法的性能优于随机搜索方法。因此,BOHB 方法在 tDCS 优化中是可行的,并可通过微调一些控制参数作为最佳刺激蒙太奇搜索器。
{"title":"Seeking Optimal Montage for Single-Pair Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Using Bayesian Optimization and Hyperband-A Feasibility Study.","authors":"Cheolki Im, Jongseung Lee, Donghyeon Kim, Sung Chan Jun, Hyeon Seo","doi":"10.1016/j.neurom.2024.09.475","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurom.2024.09.475","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is an emerging neuromodulation technique. The effect of tDCS can vary significantly depending on electrode position and current intensity, making it crucial to find an optimized tDCS montage. However, because of the high computational load, most tDCS optimization approaches have been performed with a limited number of candidates for electrode positions, such as 10-10 or 10-20 international channel configurations. This study introduced the Bayesian optimization and hyperband (BOHB) method to seek optimal tDCS montage for the entire human scalp without conventional constraints.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The BOHB method is a probabilistic approach that iteratively refines the selection of the optimal montage on the basis of previous results. To determine the suitability of this approach for tDCS simulation, we compared it with random search, which randomly selects montages, and greedy search, which, considers all candidates. Next, the conditions in the greedy search were used as the initial conditions for BOHB for fast learning. The objective function of tDCS optimization was set to maximize the average electric field norm (|E|) in the region of interest (ROI), which is the motor area (M1) and left dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The BOHB method performed better than the conventional random search for the same number of iterations in both ROIs. For M1, the iteration index yielding the maximum evaluation metric in each trial was statistically smaller in the BOHB method than in the random search (p < 0.0001). Regarding the normalized |E|, the BOHB method showed a higher normalized |E| than did the random search for the M1 region.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The BOHB method performed better than did the random search approach. Thus, the BOHB method is feasible for tDCS optimization and can be used as an optimal stimulation montage seeker by fine-tuning some control parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":19152,"journal":{"name":"Neuromodulation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142624303","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Modulation of Local Field Potentials in the Deep Brain of Minipigs Through Transcranial Temporal Interference Stimulation. 通过经颅颞叶干扰刺激调节迷你猪大脑深部的局部场电位
IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2024.10.002
Hsiao-Chun Lin, Yi-Hui Wu, Ming-Dou Ker

Objectives: Transcranial temporal interference stimulation (tTIS) is a novel, noninvasive neuromodulation technique to modulate deep brain neural activity. Despite its potential, direct electrophysiological evidence of tTIS effects remains limited. This study investigates the impact of tTIS on local field potentials (LFPs) in the deep brain using minipigs implanted with deep brain electrodes.

Materials and methods: Three minipigs were implanted with electrodes in the subthalamic nucleus, and tTIS was applied using patch electrode pairs positioned on both sides of the scalp. Stimulation was delivered in sinewave voltage mode with intensities ≤2V. We evaluated the stimulus-response relationship, effects of different carrier frequencies, the range of entrained envelope oscillations, and changes resulting from adjusting the left-right stimulation intensity ratio.

Results: The results indicated that tTIS modulates deep-brain LFPs in an intensity-dependent manner. Carrier frequencies of 1 or 2 kHz were most effective in influencing LFP. Envelope oscillations <200 Hz were effectively entrained into deep-brain LFPs. Adjustments to the stimulation intensity ratio between the left and right sides yielded inconsistent responses, with right-sided stimulation playing a dominant role.

Conclusion: These findings indicate that tTIS can regulate LFP changes in the deep brain, highlighting its potential as a promising tool for future noninvasive neuromodulation applications.

目的:经颅颞部干扰刺激(tTIS)是一种新型的非侵入性神经调控技术,用于调节大脑深部神经活动。尽管经颅颞区干扰刺激很有潜力,但其效果的直接电生理学证据仍然有限。本研究利用植入大脑深部电极的迷你猪,研究了 tTIS 对大脑深部局部场电位(LFPs)的影响:在三只小猪的丘脑下核植入电极,并使用位于头皮两侧的贴片电极对其施加 tTIS。刺激以正弦波电压模式进行,强度≤2V。我们评估了刺激-反应关系、不同载波频率的影响、夹带包络振荡的范围以及调整左右刺激强度比所产生的变化:结果表明,tTIS 以强度依赖的方式调节深脑 LFP。载波频率为 1 或 2 kHz 对 LFP 的影响最为有效。包络振荡 结论:这些研究结果表明,tTIS 可以调节大脑深部的 LFP 变化,突出了其作为未来无创神经调控应用工具的潜力。
{"title":"Modulation of Local Field Potentials in the Deep Brain of Minipigs Through Transcranial Temporal Interference Stimulation.","authors":"Hsiao-Chun Lin, Yi-Hui Wu, Ming-Dou Ker","doi":"10.1016/j.neurom.2024.10.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurom.2024.10.002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Transcranial temporal interference stimulation (tTIS) is a novel, noninvasive neuromodulation technique to modulate deep brain neural activity. Despite its potential, direct electrophysiological evidence of tTIS effects remains limited. This study investigates the impact of tTIS on local field potentials (LFPs) in the deep brain using minipigs implanted with deep brain electrodes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Three minipigs were implanted with electrodes in the subthalamic nucleus, and tTIS was applied using patch electrode pairs positioned on both sides of the scalp. Stimulation was delivered in sinewave voltage mode with intensities ≤2V. We evaluated the stimulus-response relationship, effects of different carrier frequencies, the range of entrained envelope oscillations, and changes resulting from adjusting the left-right stimulation intensity ratio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results indicated that tTIS modulates deep-brain LFPs in an intensity-dependent manner. Carrier frequencies of 1 or 2 kHz were most effective in influencing LFP. Envelope oscillations <200 Hz were effectively entrained into deep-brain LFPs. Adjustments to the stimulation intensity ratio between the left and right sides yielded inconsistent responses, with right-sided stimulation playing a dominant role.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings indicate that tTIS can regulate LFP changes in the deep brain, highlighting its potential as a promising tool for future noninvasive neuromodulation applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":19152,"journal":{"name":"Neuromodulation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142624302","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
YouTube as a Source of Medical Information About Peripheral Nerve Stimulation. YouTube 作为外周神经刺激医学信息的来源。
IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2024.09.472
Abhinav Gupta, Alexander Beletsky, Alice Y Shen, Wesley Chin, Cherry Liu, Rajiv Reddy

Objectives: YouTube is an important source of medical information for various medical topics and procedures. The purpose of the present study is to appraise the quality of medical information available on YouTube on the topic of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) for chronic pain.

Materials and methods: A total of 53 videos were appraised by four individuals using three scales for appraisal: 1) the Modified DISCERN scale, 2) the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark scoring, and 3) the Global Quality Scale. Descriptive characteristics and author type of each video were recorded. The mean scores of these scales among all four reviewers based on author type were calculated. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare mean scores of the three scales among author types, and post hoc pairwise Tukey's honestly significant difference test was used to evaluate for significant differences between mean scores. Furthermore, mean scale scores of videos above and below the total average-view count and total average "thumbs ups" were calculated and compared.

Results: Most videos (n = 31, 58.5%) were submitted from private practice. The mean Modified DISCERN and JAMA scores of videos by academic and society authors (M = 3.54 and 2.83, respectively) were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than the mean Modified DISCERN and JAMA scores of videos by private practice authors (M = 2.10 and 2.03, respectively). Interestingly, the mean scale scores of videos with above-average view counts were found to be lower than scores of videos with below-average view counts across all three scoring instruments.

Conclusions: YouTube videos on PNS stimulation for chronic pain are low to moderate in quality. Videos from academic sources were higher in quality than were private practice videos. Furthermore, videos with above-average view counts had lower mean scores on all three instruments, suggesting most of the viewership had watched lower-quality video content.

目的:YouTube 是各种医疗主题和程序的重要医疗信息来源。本研究旨在评估 YouTube 上有关外周神经刺激(PNS)治疗慢性疼痛主题的医疗信息质量:共有 53 个视频由四人使用三种评估量表进行评估:1)改良 DISCERN 量表;2)《美国医学会杂志》(JAMA)基准评分;3)全球质量量表。每段视频的描述性特征和作者类型均有记录。根据作者类型计算所有四位审稿人在这些量表中的平均得分。采用单因素方差分析来比较不同作者类型的三个量表的平均得分,并采用事后配对 Tukey's 诚实显著性差异检验来评估平均得分之间的显著差异。此外,还计算并比较了高于和低于总平均观看次数和总平均 "竖起大拇指 "次数的视频的平均量表得分:大多数视频(n = 31,58.5%)来自私人诊所。学术作者和社会作者提交的视频的平均修正 DISCERN 分和 JAMA 分(M = 3.54 和 2.83,分别)明显高于私人医生提交的视频的平均修正 DISCERN 分和 JAMA 分(M = 2.10 和 2.03,分别)(p < 0.05)。有趣的是,在所有三种评分工具中,浏览量高于平均值的视频的平均量表得分均低于浏览量低于平均值的视频:结论:YouTube上有关PNS刺激治疗慢性疼痛的视频质量处于中下水平。来自学术界的视频质量高于私人诊所的视频。此外,浏览量高于平均值的视频在三项评分工具中的平均得分都较低,这表明大部分观众观看的视频内容质量较低。
{"title":"YouTube as a Source of Medical Information About Peripheral Nerve Stimulation.","authors":"Abhinav Gupta, Alexander Beletsky, Alice Y Shen, Wesley Chin, Cherry Liu, Rajiv Reddy","doi":"10.1016/j.neurom.2024.09.472","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurom.2024.09.472","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>YouTube is an important source of medical information for various medical topics and procedures. The purpose of the present study is to appraise the quality of medical information available on YouTube on the topic of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) for chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 53 videos were appraised by four individuals using three scales for appraisal: 1) the Modified DISCERN scale, 2) the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark scoring, and 3) the Global Quality Scale. Descriptive characteristics and author type of each video were recorded. The mean scores of these scales among all four reviewers based on author type were calculated. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare mean scores of the three scales among author types, and post hoc pairwise Tukey's honestly significant difference test was used to evaluate for significant differences between mean scores. Furthermore, mean scale scores of videos above and below the total average-view count and total average \"thumbs ups\" were calculated and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most videos (n = 31, 58.5%) were submitted from private practice. The mean Modified DISCERN and JAMA scores of videos by academic and society authors (M = 3.54 and 2.83, respectively) were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than the mean Modified DISCERN and JAMA scores of videos by private practice authors (M = 2.10 and 2.03, respectively). Interestingly, the mean scale scores of videos with above-average view counts were found to be lower than scores of videos with below-average view counts across all three scoring instruments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>YouTube videos on PNS stimulation for chronic pain are low to moderate in quality. Videos from academic sources were higher in quality than were private practice videos. Furthermore, videos with above-average view counts had lower mean scores on all three instruments, suggesting most of the viewership had watched lower-quality video content.</p>","PeriodicalId":19152,"journal":{"name":"Neuromodulation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142624313","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Neuromodulation
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1