用于分析挥发性化合物的不同固相微萃取形式的比较--一项综合研究。

IF 4.2 2区 化学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Molecules Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.3390/molecules29215137
Martyna Natalia Wieczorek
{"title":"用于分析挥发性化合物的不同固相微萃取形式的比较--一项综合研究。","authors":"Martyna Natalia Wieczorek","doi":"10.3390/molecules29215137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The coupling of Solid-Phase Microextraction (SPME) technology with gas chromatography (GC) has a well-established and successful history. Traditionally, SPME fibers have been the most popular form thanks to their versatility and the ease with which they can be fully automated. However, alternative geometries for SPME have been developed over the years, beginning with Stir Bar Sorptive Extraction (SBSE) and later evolving into Thin-Film SPME (TF-SPME) devices. Each of these formats offers distinct advantages and disadvantages, which are explored in this study. The primary objective of this study was to comprehensively compare available forms of SPME devices, with a special focus on the advantages of TF-SPME, a novel microextraction method particularly suited for the analysis of odorants in food. The study involved analyzing a standard mixture of 11 key food odorants, representing a range of polarities, to evaluate the efficiency of TF-SPME devices in terms of the number of analytes extracted. Furthermore, four types of TF-SPME devices were compared against each other in both standard mixtures and actual food samples. The final stage of the study employed GCxGC-ToFMS analysis to showcase the potential of the most efficient HLB-TF-SPME device in the non-targeted analysis of complex samples, exemplified by unfiltered wheat beer. This analysis demonstrated the significant capability of HLB-TF-SPME in capturing and identifying a wide range of volatile compounds in complex matrices.</p>","PeriodicalId":19041,"journal":{"name":"Molecules","volume":"29 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11547884/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Different Solid-Phase Microextraction Formats Dedicated to the Analysis of Volatile Compounds-A Comprehensive Study.\",\"authors\":\"Martyna Natalia Wieczorek\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/molecules29215137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The coupling of Solid-Phase Microextraction (SPME) technology with gas chromatography (GC) has a well-established and successful history. Traditionally, SPME fibers have been the most popular form thanks to their versatility and the ease with which they can be fully automated. However, alternative geometries for SPME have been developed over the years, beginning with Stir Bar Sorptive Extraction (SBSE) and later evolving into Thin-Film SPME (TF-SPME) devices. Each of these formats offers distinct advantages and disadvantages, which are explored in this study. The primary objective of this study was to comprehensively compare available forms of SPME devices, with a special focus on the advantages of TF-SPME, a novel microextraction method particularly suited for the analysis of odorants in food. The study involved analyzing a standard mixture of 11 key food odorants, representing a range of polarities, to evaluate the efficiency of TF-SPME devices in terms of the number of analytes extracted. Furthermore, four types of TF-SPME devices were compared against each other in both standard mixtures and actual food samples. The final stage of the study employed GCxGC-ToFMS analysis to showcase the potential of the most efficient HLB-TF-SPME device in the non-targeted analysis of complex samples, exemplified by unfiltered wheat beer. This analysis demonstrated the significant capability of HLB-TF-SPME in capturing and identifying a wide range of volatile compounds in complex matrices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Molecules\",\"volume\":\"29 21\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11547884/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Molecules\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29215137\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecules","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29215137","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

固相微萃取(SPME)技术与气相色谱法(GC)的结合有着悠久而成功的历史。传统上,固相微萃取(SPME)纤维因其多功能性和易于实现全自动化而一直是最受欢迎的形式。不过,多年来,SPME 的其他几何形状也得到了发展,首先是搅拌棒吸附萃取 (SBSE),后来发展到薄膜 SPME (TF-SPME) 装置。这些形式各有优缺点,本研究将对其进行探讨。本研究的主要目的是全面比较现有形式的 SPME 设备,并特别关注 TF-SPME 的优势,这是一种新型的微萃取方法,尤其适用于分析食品中的气味物质。这项研究分析了 11 种主要食品气味物质的标准混合物,它们代表了不同的极性,以评估 TF-SPME 装置在萃取分析物数量方面的效率。此外,还在标准混合物和实际食品样品中对四种 TF-SPME 装置进行了比较。研究的最后阶段采用了 GCxGC-ToFMS 分析方法,以展示最高效的 HLB-TF-SPME 装置在复杂样品(例如未经过滤的小麦啤酒)的非目标分析中的潜力。这项分析表明,HLB-TF-SPME 在复杂基质中捕获和鉴定多种挥发性化合物方面具有显著的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Different Solid-Phase Microextraction Formats Dedicated to the Analysis of Volatile Compounds-A Comprehensive Study.

The coupling of Solid-Phase Microextraction (SPME) technology with gas chromatography (GC) has a well-established and successful history. Traditionally, SPME fibers have been the most popular form thanks to their versatility and the ease with which they can be fully automated. However, alternative geometries for SPME have been developed over the years, beginning with Stir Bar Sorptive Extraction (SBSE) and later evolving into Thin-Film SPME (TF-SPME) devices. Each of these formats offers distinct advantages and disadvantages, which are explored in this study. The primary objective of this study was to comprehensively compare available forms of SPME devices, with a special focus on the advantages of TF-SPME, a novel microextraction method particularly suited for the analysis of odorants in food. The study involved analyzing a standard mixture of 11 key food odorants, representing a range of polarities, to evaluate the efficiency of TF-SPME devices in terms of the number of analytes extracted. Furthermore, four types of TF-SPME devices were compared against each other in both standard mixtures and actual food samples. The final stage of the study employed GCxGC-ToFMS analysis to showcase the potential of the most efficient HLB-TF-SPME device in the non-targeted analysis of complex samples, exemplified by unfiltered wheat beer. This analysis demonstrated the significant capability of HLB-TF-SPME in capturing and identifying a wide range of volatile compounds in complex matrices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Molecules
Molecules 化学-有机化学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
7524
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Molecules (ISSN 1420-3049, CODEN: MOLEFW) is an open access journal of synthetic organic chemistry and natural product chemistry. All articles are peer-reviewed and published continously upon acceptance. Molecules is published by MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. Our aim is to encourage chemists to publish as much as possible their experimental detail, particularly synthetic procedures and characterization information. There is no restriction on the length of the experimental section. In addition, availability of compound samples is published and considered as important information. Authors are encouraged to register or deposit their chemical samples through the non-profit international organization Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI). Molecules has been launched in 1996 to preserve and exploit molecular diversity of both, chemical information and chemical substances.
期刊最新文献
Design of a New Catalyst, Manganese(III) Complex, for the Oxidative Degradation of Azo Dye Molecules in Water Using Hydrogen Peroxide. Selectivity Control in Nitroaldol (Henry) Reaction by Changing the Basic Anion in a Chiral Copper(II) Complex Based on (S)-2-Aminomethylpyrrolidine and 3,5-Di-tert-butylsalicylaldehyde. Structured Fruit Cube Snack of BRS Vitoria Grape with Gala Apple: Phenolic Composition and Sensory Attributes. Enhanced Degradation of Norfloxacin Under Visible Light by S-Scheme Fe2O3/g-C3N4 Heterojunctions. Evaluation of APTES-Functionalized Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles for Adsorption of CH4 and CO2.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1