2004-2016年全国癌症数据库中美国视网膜母细胞瘤发病、管理和局部复发的差异。

IF 4.4 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Ophthalmology. Retina Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1016/j.oret.2024.11.005
Jodi Y So, Suzann Pershing, Erqi Liu Pollom, Susan M Hiniker, Armin R Afshar
{"title":"2004-2016年全国癌症数据库中美国视网膜母细胞瘤发病、管理和局部复发的差异。","authors":"Jodi Y So, Suzann Pershing, Erqi Liu Pollom, Susan M Hiniker, Armin R Afshar","doi":"10.1016/j.oret.2024.11.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate patient-level differences in retinoblastoma presentation, treatments, and outcomes within the United States.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective registry-based analysis.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>1,404 retinoblastoma cases in the National Cancer Database, 2004-2016, a US-based cancer registry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient characteristics and treatments were investigated over time. Primary treatment was classified as enucleation, local tumor destruction, chemotherapy, and/or radiation. Multivariable logistic regression models evaluated extraocular disease at presentation, treatment, and local recurrence following primary globe-sparing therapy.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Odds ratios for extraocular disease at presentation; primary treatment modality; local recurrence after primary globe-sparing therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Extraocular disease affected 13% of patients at presentation (N=178). All-cause mortality among the entire cohort was 3.1% (n=44) at last follow-up Those who were non-white, uninsured or had government-funded insurance, or with non-metropolitan residence had significantly greater odds of extraocular disease (OR 2.21-3.64 for non-white vs. white non-Hispanic patients, OR 2.05-2.95 for uninsured or Medicaid/Medicare/government-funded vs. private/commercial insurance, and OR 1.80 for non-metropolitan vs. metropolitan residence). Between 2004-2016, utilization of chemotherapy (55% to 73%) and local tumor destruction (17% to 27%) increased. Enucleations remained over-represented among Hispanic patients (63% received enucleation in 2016, vs. 35% non-Hispanic patients; OR=1.83, (95% CI 1.22-2.75) for enucleation among Hispanic vs. white, non-Hispanic patients). Patients with Medicaid/Medicare/government insurance and non-metropolitan residence also had higher odds of enucleation, and non-metropolitan patients had higher odds of local recurrence after primary globe-sparing therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite overall decline in enucleation and increase in globe-sparing therapy between 2004-2016, Hispanic, Medicaid/Medicare/government-insured, and non-metropolitan patients continued to have higher odds of extraocular disease at presentation and higher odds of undergoing enucleation as primary therapy. This suggests limitations in access to care and that shifts towards globe-sparing treatment (chemotherapy and local tumor destruction) did not occur equally across all patient groups. Further investigations into these disparities is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":19501,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology. Retina","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disparities in US retinoblastoma presentation, management and local recurrence in the National Cancer Database, 2004-2016.\",\"authors\":\"Jodi Y So, Suzann Pershing, Erqi Liu Pollom, Susan M Hiniker, Armin R Afshar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.oret.2024.11.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate patient-level differences in retinoblastoma presentation, treatments, and outcomes within the United States.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective registry-based analysis.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>1,404 retinoblastoma cases in the National Cancer Database, 2004-2016, a US-based cancer registry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient characteristics and treatments were investigated over time. Primary treatment was classified as enucleation, local tumor destruction, chemotherapy, and/or radiation. Multivariable logistic regression models evaluated extraocular disease at presentation, treatment, and local recurrence following primary globe-sparing therapy.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Odds ratios for extraocular disease at presentation; primary treatment modality; local recurrence after primary globe-sparing therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Extraocular disease affected 13% of patients at presentation (N=178). All-cause mortality among the entire cohort was 3.1% (n=44) at last follow-up Those who were non-white, uninsured or had government-funded insurance, or with non-metropolitan residence had significantly greater odds of extraocular disease (OR 2.21-3.64 for non-white vs. white non-Hispanic patients, OR 2.05-2.95 for uninsured or Medicaid/Medicare/government-funded vs. private/commercial insurance, and OR 1.80 for non-metropolitan vs. metropolitan residence). Between 2004-2016, utilization of chemotherapy (55% to 73%) and local tumor destruction (17% to 27%) increased. Enucleations remained over-represented among Hispanic patients (63% received enucleation in 2016, vs. 35% non-Hispanic patients; OR=1.83, (95% CI 1.22-2.75) for enucleation among Hispanic vs. white, non-Hispanic patients). Patients with Medicaid/Medicare/government insurance and non-metropolitan residence also had higher odds of enucleation, and non-metropolitan patients had higher odds of local recurrence after primary globe-sparing therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite overall decline in enucleation and increase in globe-sparing therapy between 2004-2016, Hispanic, Medicaid/Medicare/government-insured, and non-metropolitan patients continued to have higher odds of extraocular disease at presentation and higher odds of undergoing enucleation as primary therapy. This suggests limitations in access to care and that shifts towards globe-sparing treatment (chemotherapy and local tumor destruction) did not occur equally across all patient groups. Further investigations into these disparities is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmology. Retina\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmology. Retina\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2024.11.005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology. Retina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2024.11.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:调查美国视网膜母细胞瘤患者在发病、治疗和预后方面的差异:设计:基于登记的回顾性分析:2004-2016年美国国家癌症数据库(National Cancer Database)中的1404例视网膜母细胞瘤病例:方法:调查不同时期的患者特征和治疗方法。主要治疗方法分为去核、局部肿瘤切除、化疗和/或放疗。多变量逻辑回归模型评估了患者发病时的眼外疾病、治疗情况以及初次保球治疗后的局部复发情况:主要结果测量指标:发病时眼外疾病的比值比;主要治疗方式;主要保球治疗后的局部复发:结果:13%的患者发病时患有眼外疾病(178例)。非白人、无保险或有政府资助的保险或居住在非大都市的患者患眼外疾病的几率明显更高(非白人与非西班牙裔白人患者的OR值为2.21-3.64,无保险或医疗补助/医保/政府资助与私人/商业保险的OR值为2.05-2.95,居住在非大都市与居住在大都市的OR值为1.80)。2004-2016 年间,化疗(55% 至 73%)和局部肿瘤切除(17% 至 27%)的使用率有所上升。西班牙裔患者接受去核手术的比例仍然偏高(2016年,63%的西班牙裔患者接受了去核手术,而非西班牙裔患者为35%;西班牙裔患者与白人、非西班牙裔患者相比,去核手术的OR=1.83,(95% CI为1.22-2.75))。医疗补助/医疗保险/政府保险患者和非大城市居住的患者接受去核手术的几率也较高,非大城市患者接受初级保球治疗后局部复发的几率也较高:尽管2004-2016年间去核手术总体上有所减少,保球疗法有所增加,但西班牙裔、医疗补助/医疗保险/政府保险和非大城市患者在就诊时患有眼外疾病的几率仍然较高,接受去核手术作为主要疗法的几率也较高。这表明在获得治疗方面存在局限性,而且向保全眼球治疗(化疗和局部肿瘤切除)的转变并没有在所有患者群体中平等发生。有必要进一步调查这些差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Disparities in US retinoblastoma presentation, management and local recurrence in the National Cancer Database, 2004-2016.

Purpose: To investigate patient-level differences in retinoblastoma presentation, treatments, and outcomes within the United States.

Design: Retrospective registry-based analysis.

Participants: 1,404 retinoblastoma cases in the National Cancer Database, 2004-2016, a US-based cancer registry.

Methods: Patient characteristics and treatments were investigated over time. Primary treatment was classified as enucleation, local tumor destruction, chemotherapy, and/or radiation. Multivariable logistic regression models evaluated extraocular disease at presentation, treatment, and local recurrence following primary globe-sparing therapy.

Main outcome measures: Odds ratios for extraocular disease at presentation; primary treatment modality; local recurrence after primary globe-sparing therapy.

Results: Extraocular disease affected 13% of patients at presentation (N=178). All-cause mortality among the entire cohort was 3.1% (n=44) at last follow-up Those who were non-white, uninsured or had government-funded insurance, or with non-metropolitan residence had significantly greater odds of extraocular disease (OR 2.21-3.64 for non-white vs. white non-Hispanic patients, OR 2.05-2.95 for uninsured or Medicaid/Medicare/government-funded vs. private/commercial insurance, and OR 1.80 for non-metropolitan vs. metropolitan residence). Between 2004-2016, utilization of chemotherapy (55% to 73%) and local tumor destruction (17% to 27%) increased. Enucleations remained over-represented among Hispanic patients (63% received enucleation in 2016, vs. 35% non-Hispanic patients; OR=1.83, (95% CI 1.22-2.75) for enucleation among Hispanic vs. white, non-Hispanic patients). Patients with Medicaid/Medicare/government insurance and non-metropolitan residence also had higher odds of enucleation, and non-metropolitan patients had higher odds of local recurrence after primary globe-sparing therapy.

Conclusions: Despite overall decline in enucleation and increase in globe-sparing therapy between 2004-2016, Hispanic, Medicaid/Medicare/government-insured, and non-metropolitan patients continued to have higher odds of extraocular disease at presentation and higher odds of undergoing enucleation as primary therapy. This suggests limitations in access to care and that shifts towards globe-sparing treatment (chemotherapy and local tumor destruction) did not occur equally across all patient groups. Further investigations into these disparities is warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmology. Retina
Ophthalmology. Retina Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
274
审稿时长
33 days
期刊最新文献
Intravitreal Melphalan versus Topotecan for Vitreous Seeds in Retinoblastoma: A Comparative study of 64 Asian Indian eyes. Type 3 MNV in AMD: baseline predictors of 3-year macular atrophy development. Foveal and Henle Fiber Layer Hemorrhage in Immune Thrombocytopenia. High-dose Intravitreal Topotecan for Perifoveal Recurrence of Retinoblastoma. Alcohol Consumption and Risk of Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Geographic Atrophy Progression: AREDS2 Report 34.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1