[瑞士的协助自杀(第一部分):医学伦理争议与巫师学徒的困境]。

Q4 Medicine Praxis Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.23785/PRAXIS.2024.09.003
Uwe Güth, Eduard Battegay, Ralf J Jox, Karim Abawi, Rolf Weitkunat, Andres R Schneeberger
{"title":"[瑞士的协助自杀(第一部分):医学伦理争议与巫师学徒的困境]。","authors":"Uwe Güth, Eduard Battegay, Ralf J Jox, Karim Abawi, Rolf Weitkunat, Andres R Schneeberger","doi":"10.23785/PRAXIS.2024.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Based on the cases in which assisted suicide (AS) has taken place in Switzerland in the context of a mental disorder or dementia, we discuss whether the slippery slope argument often brought up by opponents of assisted dying is justified. Long-term data from the Swiss Federal Statistical Office shows that while the number of cases with these «indications» is increasing (1999-2017: on average 21 cases/year vs. 2018-2022: n = 73 cases/year), the percentage share of these diseases in the total number of all AS cases has remained unchanged at around 5 %. Opponents of assisted dying believe that the slippery slope argument is already fulfilled by the fact that these cases occur at all. However, the still limited prevalence of these specific indications which still represent only a minority of assisted suicide cases over time, may be used by advocates of assisted dying to weaken the opposing viewpoint.</p>","PeriodicalId":20494,"journal":{"name":"Praxis","volume":"113 9","pages":"230-234"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Assisted suicide in Switzerland (part 1): Medical-ethical controversies and the dilemma of the sorcerer's apprentice].\",\"authors\":\"Uwe Güth, Eduard Battegay, Ralf J Jox, Karim Abawi, Rolf Weitkunat, Andres R Schneeberger\",\"doi\":\"10.23785/PRAXIS.2024.09.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Based on the cases in which assisted suicide (AS) has taken place in Switzerland in the context of a mental disorder or dementia, we discuss whether the slippery slope argument often brought up by opponents of assisted dying is justified. Long-term data from the Swiss Federal Statistical Office shows that while the number of cases with these «indications» is increasing (1999-2017: on average 21 cases/year vs. 2018-2022: n = 73 cases/year), the percentage share of these diseases in the total number of all AS cases has remained unchanged at around 5 %. Opponents of assisted dying believe that the slippery slope argument is already fulfilled by the fact that these cases occur at all. However, the still limited prevalence of these specific indications which still represent only a minority of assisted suicide cases over time, may be used by advocates of assisted dying to weaken the opposing viewpoint.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Praxis\",\"volume\":\"113 9\",\"pages\":\"230-234\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Praxis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23785/PRAXIS.2024.09.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23785/PRAXIS.2024.09.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:根据瑞士发生的精神障碍或痴呆症辅助自杀(AS)案例,我们讨论了辅助死亡的反对者经常提出的滑坡论点是否合理。瑞士联邦统计局的长期数据显示,虽然具有这些 "适应症 "的病例数量在不断增加(1999-2017年:平均每年21例,2018-2022年:n=73例/年),但这些疾病在所有辅助死亡病例总数中所占的比例却一直保持在5%左右。辅助死亡的反对者认为,这些病例的出现已经满足了 "滑坡 "论点的要求。然而,随着时间的推移,这些特定适应症的发病率仍然有限,在协助自杀病例中仍然只占少数,这可能会被协助死亡的倡导者用来削弱反对者的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Assisted suicide in Switzerland (part 1): Medical-ethical controversies and the dilemma of the sorcerer's apprentice].

Introduction: Based on the cases in which assisted suicide (AS) has taken place in Switzerland in the context of a mental disorder or dementia, we discuss whether the slippery slope argument often brought up by opponents of assisted dying is justified. Long-term data from the Swiss Federal Statistical Office shows that while the number of cases with these «indications» is increasing (1999-2017: on average 21 cases/year vs. 2018-2022: n = 73 cases/year), the percentage share of these diseases in the total number of all AS cases has remained unchanged at around 5 %. Opponents of assisted dying believe that the slippery slope argument is already fulfilled by the fact that these cases occur at all. However, the still limited prevalence of these specific indications which still represent only a minority of assisted suicide cases over time, may be used by advocates of assisted dying to weaken the opposing viewpoint.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Praxis
Praxis Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
146
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
[Alzheimer's disease - system prepardeness in the context of new developments]. [Clinical management of patients with cavernous malformations of the central nervous system: an update and recommendations for clinical practice]. [Rabies and mobility: 2025 update]. [Ultrasound-guided synovial biopsy]. [Uncommon Yet Severe: Metabolic Acidosis from Concurrent Use of Paracetamol and Flucloxacillin].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1