Markus Schlömicher, Katrin Prümmer, Peter Haldenwang, Vadim Moustafine, Dinah Berres, Matthias Bechtel, Justus T Strauch
{"title":"与传统 AVR 相比,快速部署 AVR 后会出现传导障碍。","authors":"Markus Schlömicher, Katrin Prümmer, Peter Haldenwang, Vadim Moustafine, Dinah Berres, Matthias Bechtel, Justus T Strauch","doi":"10.1055/a-2464-2727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives We evaluated and compared incidence and evolution of atrioventricular and intraventricular conduction disorders following rapid deployment AVR and conventional AVR. Methods 147 patients who underwent isolated rapid deployment AVR between 2017 and 2021 as well as 128 patients after conventional biological AVR in the same period were included in this study. ECGs recorded at baseline, discharge and 12 months were retrospectively analyzed. Results Patients in both groups had comparable a STS score (2.9 ± 1.6 vs 3.1 ± 2.2 p=0.32) and comparable baseline characteristics. At discharge the mean QRS width in the RDAVR group was significantly increased with 117.4 28.6 ms and a mean QRS width of 21.7 26.3 ms (p<0.001) compared to baseline. No significant changes of QRS width were found in the AVR group with a mean value of 101.2 24.1 ms and a mean QRS width of 3.9 23.9 ms at discharge (p=0.193). Left bundle branch block was increased in the RDAVR group after 12 months (19.3% vs 5.1% p<0.001) Permanent pacemaker implantation rates were significantly higher in the RDAVR group after 12months. (HR: 4.68; 95% CI: 2.23 - 7.43 p<0.001) Mortality did not differ in both groups after 12 months (HR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.46 - 1.83; p = 0.835) Conclusions Patients after RDAVR showed significant higher rates of left bundle branch block with significantly increased QRS width and permanent pacemaker implantation after 12 months. However, higher mortality was not observed in the RDAVR group.</p>","PeriodicalId":23057,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conduction disorders after rapid deployment AVR compared to conventional AVR.\",\"authors\":\"Markus Schlömicher, Katrin Prümmer, Peter Haldenwang, Vadim Moustafine, Dinah Berres, Matthias Bechtel, Justus T Strauch\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2464-2727\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objectives We evaluated and compared incidence and evolution of atrioventricular and intraventricular conduction disorders following rapid deployment AVR and conventional AVR. Methods 147 patients who underwent isolated rapid deployment AVR between 2017 and 2021 as well as 128 patients after conventional biological AVR in the same period were included in this study. ECGs recorded at baseline, discharge and 12 months were retrospectively analyzed. Results Patients in both groups had comparable a STS score (2.9 ± 1.6 vs 3.1 ± 2.2 p=0.32) and comparable baseline characteristics. At discharge the mean QRS width in the RDAVR group was significantly increased with 117.4 28.6 ms and a mean QRS width of 21.7 26.3 ms (p<0.001) compared to baseline. No significant changes of QRS width were found in the AVR group with a mean value of 101.2 24.1 ms and a mean QRS width of 3.9 23.9 ms at discharge (p=0.193). Left bundle branch block was increased in the RDAVR group after 12 months (19.3% vs 5.1% p<0.001) Permanent pacemaker implantation rates were significantly higher in the RDAVR group after 12months. (HR: 4.68; 95% CI: 2.23 - 7.43 p<0.001) Mortality did not differ in both groups after 12 months (HR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.46 - 1.83; p = 0.835) Conclusions Patients after RDAVR showed significant higher rates of left bundle branch block with significantly increased QRS width and permanent pacemaker implantation after 12 months. However, higher mortality was not observed in the RDAVR group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2464-2727\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2464-2727","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Conduction disorders after rapid deployment AVR compared to conventional AVR.
Objectives We evaluated and compared incidence and evolution of atrioventricular and intraventricular conduction disorders following rapid deployment AVR and conventional AVR. Methods 147 patients who underwent isolated rapid deployment AVR between 2017 and 2021 as well as 128 patients after conventional biological AVR in the same period were included in this study. ECGs recorded at baseline, discharge and 12 months were retrospectively analyzed. Results Patients in both groups had comparable a STS score (2.9 ± 1.6 vs 3.1 ± 2.2 p=0.32) and comparable baseline characteristics. At discharge the mean QRS width in the RDAVR group was significantly increased with 117.4 28.6 ms and a mean QRS width of 21.7 26.3 ms (p<0.001) compared to baseline. No significant changes of QRS width were found in the AVR group with a mean value of 101.2 24.1 ms and a mean QRS width of 3.9 23.9 ms at discharge (p=0.193). Left bundle branch block was increased in the RDAVR group after 12 months (19.3% vs 5.1% p<0.001) Permanent pacemaker implantation rates were significantly higher in the RDAVR group after 12months. (HR: 4.68; 95% CI: 2.23 - 7.43 p<0.001) Mortality did not differ in both groups after 12 months (HR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.46 - 1.83; p = 0.835) Conclusions Patients after RDAVR showed significant higher rates of left bundle branch block with significantly increased QRS width and permanent pacemaker implantation after 12 months. However, higher mortality was not observed in the RDAVR group.
期刊介绍:
The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon publishes articles of the highest standard from internationally recognized thoracic and cardiovascular surgeons, cardiologists, anesthesiologists, physiologists, and pathologists. This journal is an essential resource for anyone working in this field.
Original articles, short communications, reviews and important meeting announcements keep you abreast of key clinical advances, as well as providing the theoretical background of cardiovascular and thoracic surgery. Case reports are published in our Open Access companion journal The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon Reports.