{"title":"[用于评估慢性阻塞性肺病患者生活质量的特定外国工具]。","authors":"D A Andreev, N N Kamynina","doi":"10.32687/0869-866X-2024-32-s2-1057-1062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) usually have a decreased quality of life (QOL). Specialized questionnaires on QOL may be more sensitive when studying individual issues of COPD therapy than general (universal) questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Goal: </strong>Conducting a review of specific tools for assessing the quality of life of patients with COPD.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study was carried out based on the results of a search of scientific literature presented in the bibliographic databases PubMed (USA) and ELIBRARY.RU (Russia, Russian-language sources). Keywords were used to search for relevant sources: «quality of life», «COPD», «chronic obstructive pulmonary disease» etc. In order to search for information on individual questionnaires, queries containing the names of the questionnaires were used. Additional references were obtained using the search engines Google and Yandex.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the results of a study of the scientific literature and a search in the PubMed / Medline information base, 22 specific tests used to assess the quality of life of patients with COPD were considered. These tests demonstrate different relevance and scientific applicability in recent years. Five tests were most often used in foreign and domestic studies: St. George respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ), the COPD assessment test (CAT), the modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale (mMRC), the chronic respiratory questionnaire (CRQ), the clinical COPD questionnaire (CCQ).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Further study as well as local adaptation (if so required) of some questionnaires will open up new opportunities for their wider implementation into the routine daily practice of providing medical care to patients with COPD in the regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":35946,"journal":{"name":"Problemy sotsial''noi gigieny i istoriia meditsiny / NII sotsial''noi gigieny, ekonomiki i upravleniia zdravookhraneniem im. N.A. Semashko RAMN, AO ''Assotsiatsiia ''Meditsinskaia literatura''","volume":"32 Special 2","pages":"1057-1062"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Specific foreign tools for assessing the quality of life of patients with COPD].\",\"authors\":\"D A Andreev, N N Kamynina\",\"doi\":\"10.32687/0869-866X-2024-32-s2-1057-1062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) usually have a decreased quality of life (QOL). Specialized questionnaires on QOL may be more sensitive when studying individual issues of COPD therapy than general (universal) questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Goal: </strong>Conducting a review of specific tools for assessing the quality of life of patients with COPD.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study was carried out based on the results of a search of scientific literature presented in the bibliographic databases PubMed (USA) and ELIBRARY.RU (Russia, Russian-language sources). Keywords were used to search for relevant sources: «quality of life», «COPD», «chronic obstructive pulmonary disease» etc. In order to search for information on individual questionnaires, queries containing the names of the questionnaires were used. Additional references were obtained using the search engines Google and Yandex.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the results of a study of the scientific literature and a search in the PubMed / Medline information base, 22 specific tests used to assess the quality of life of patients with COPD were considered. These tests demonstrate different relevance and scientific applicability in recent years. Five tests were most often used in foreign and domestic studies: St. George respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ), the COPD assessment test (CAT), the modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale (mMRC), the chronic respiratory questionnaire (CRQ), the clinical COPD questionnaire (CCQ).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Further study as well as local adaptation (if so required) of some questionnaires will open up new opportunities for their wider implementation into the routine daily practice of providing medical care to patients with COPD in the regions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Problemy sotsial''noi gigieny i istoriia meditsiny / NII sotsial''noi gigieny, ekonomiki i upravleniia zdravookhraneniem im. N.A. Semashko RAMN, AO ''Assotsiatsiia ''Meditsinskaia literatura''\",\"volume\":\"32 Special 2\",\"pages\":\"1057-1062\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Problemy sotsial''noi gigieny i istoriia meditsiny / NII sotsial''noi gigieny, ekonomiki i upravleniia zdravookhraneniem im. N.A. Semashko RAMN, AO ''Assotsiatsiia ''Meditsinskaia literatura''\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32687/0869-866X-2024-32-s2-1057-1062\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problemy sotsial''noi gigieny i istoriia meditsiny / NII sotsial''noi gigieny, ekonomiki i upravleniia zdravookhraneniem im. N.A. Semashko RAMN, AO ''Assotsiatsiia ''Meditsinskaia literatura''","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32687/0869-866X-2024-32-s2-1057-1062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)患者的生活质量(QOL)通常会下降。在研究慢性阻塞性肺病治疗的个别问题时,专门的 QOL 问卷可能比一般(通用)问卷更敏感。目标:对评估慢性阻塞性肺病患者生活质量的专门工具进行综述:本研究是在PubMed(美国)和ELIBRARY.RU(俄罗斯,俄语资源)书目数据库中科学文献检索结果的基础上进行的。关键词用于搜索相关资料:"生活质量"、"慢性阻塞性肺病"、"慢性阻塞性肺病 "等。为了搜索个别问卷的信息,使用了包含问卷名称的查询。此外,还使用 Google 和 Yandex.Results 搜索引擎获取了其他参考资料:根据对科学文献的研究结果以及在 PubMed / Medline 信息库中的搜索,考虑了 22 种用于评估慢性阻塞性肺病患者生活质量的特定测试。近年来,这些测试显示出不同的相关性和科学适用性。在国外和国内的研究中,有五种测试最为常用:圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)、慢性阻塞性肺病评估测试(CAT)、医学研究委员会呼吸困难量表(mMRC)、慢性呼吸问卷(CRQ)、慢性阻塞性肺病临床问卷(CCQ):结论:对一些问卷的进一步研究和本地化调整(如有需要)将为这些问卷在各地区慢性阻塞性肺病患者的日常医疗护理工作中更广泛地实施提供新的机会。
[Specific foreign tools for assessing the quality of life of patients with COPD].
Introduction: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) usually have a decreased quality of life (QOL). Specialized questionnaires on QOL may be more sensitive when studying individual issues of COPD therapy than general (universal) questionnaires.
Goal: Conducting a review of specific tools for assessing the quality of life of patients with COPD.
Materials and methods: The study was carried out based on the results of a search of scientific literature presented in the bibliographic databases PubMed (USA) and ELIBRARY.RU (Russia, Russian-language sources). Keywords were used to search for relevant sources: «quality of life», «COPD», «chronic obstructive pulmonary disease» etc. In order to search for information on individual questionnaires, queries containing the names of the questionnaires were used. Additional references were obtained using the search engines Google and Yandex.
Results: Based on the results of a study of the scientific literature and a search in the PubMed / Medline information base, 22 specific tests used to assess the quality of life of patients with COPD were considered. These tests demonstrate different relevance and scientific applicability in recent years. Five tests were most often used in foreign and domestic studies: St. George respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ), the COPD assessment test (CAT), the modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale (mMRC), the chronic respiratory questionnaire (CRQ), the clinical COPD questionnaire (CCQ).
Conclusion: Further study as well as local adaptation (if so required) of some questionnaires will open up new opportunities for their wider implementation into the routine daily practice of providing medical care to patients with COPD in the regions.