利用现场模拟提高团队绩效,并使用快速顺序插管清单。

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES AEM Education and Training Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1002/aet2.11039
Kathleen M. Waters MD, Ruth Hwu MD, Mona Kulkarni MD, Jeffrey Okonye MD, Ronine Zamor MD, MPH, Sofia Chaudhary MD, Andrew Jergel MPH, Scott Gillespie MS, MSPH, Abby Lewis MD, Rachel Krieger DO, MS, Vidya Menon MD, Geovonni Bell MD, Jacob Levy DO, Tory Prynn MD, Jacqueline Regan MD, MPH, Claire Mathai BSN, Nandranie Goodwin BSN, Sherita Holmes MD
{"title":"利用现场模拟提高团队绩效,并使用快速顺序插管清单。","authors":"Kathleen M. Waters MD,&nbsp;Ruth Hwu MD,&nbsp;Mona Kulkarni MD,&nbsp;Jeffrey Okonye MD,&nbsp;Ronine Zamor MD, MPH,&nbsp;Sofia Chaudhary MD,&nbsp;Andrew Jergel MPH,&nbsp;Scott Gillespie MS, MSPH,&nbsp;Abby Lewis MD,&nbsp;Rachel Krieger DO, MS,&nbsp;Vidya Menon MD,&nbsp;Geovonni Bell MD,&nbsp;Jacob Levy DO,&nbsp;Tory Prynn MD,&nbsp;Jacqueline Regan MD, MPH,&nbsp;Claire Mathai BSN,&nbsp;Nandranie Goodwin BSN,&nbsp;Sherita Holmes MD","doi":"10.1002/aet2.11039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Intubation checklists have emerged as tools to reduce adverse events and improve efficiency during rapid sequence intubation (RSI) in pediatric emergency departments (PEDs). This study aimed to use multidisciplinary simulation (SIM) training as an educational tool to improve PED team performance during RSI scenarios through utilization of an RSI checklist.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We created a checklist modeled after previously published PED checklists. PED multidisciplinary teams participated in video-recorded SIM training sessions involving a scenario requiring intubation three times, first without interruption then while receiving our intervention of rapid-cycle deliberate practice (RCDP) debriefing focusing on checklist utilization and team dynamics. Learners went through the scenario once more uninterrupted to apply learned skills. Team performance was evaluated via video review using the Simulation Team Assessment Tool (STAT) focusing on airway management and human factors sections. Scores were compared before and after intervention along with pre- and postintervention surveys.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 483 learners participated in 64 SIM training sessions, 44 of whom met inclusion criteria and were included for data analysis. Scores increased postintervention for airway management, human factors and in total. Least-squares mean differences for total, airway, and human factors scores were 9.55 (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.24–11.85), 4.22 (95% CI 2.91–5.52), and 5.33 (95% CI 3.86–6.8), respectively, which was statistically significant with <i>p</i>-value of &lt;0.001 across all categories. Surveys demonstrated improved role understanding and checklist utilization comfort postintervention.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study supports the benefit of multidisciplinary SIM training with RCDP-style methodology as an educational method for improving airway management, teamwork skills, and RSI checklist utilization for PED staff. Incorporation of additional maintenance SIM sessions for ongoing education is likely to be further beneficial and would allow evaluation of degradation of skills over time following initial training.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"8 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of in situ simulation to improve team performance and utilization of a rapid sequence intubation checklist\",\"authors\":\"Kathleen M. Waters MD,&nbsp;Ruth Hwu MD,&nbsp;Mona Kulkarni MD,&nbsp;Jeffrey Okonye MD,&nbsp;Ronine Zamor MD, MPH,&nbsp;Sofia Chaudhary MD,&nbsp;Andrew Jergel MPH,&nbsp;Scott Gillespie MS, MSPH,&nbsp;Abby Lewis MD,&nbsp;Rachel Krieger DO, MS,&nbsp;Vidya Menon MD,&nbsp;Geovonni Bell MD,&nbsp;Jacob Levy DO,&nbsp;Tory Prynn MD,&nbsp;Jacqueline Regan MD, MPH,&nbsp;Claire Mathai BSN,&nbsp;Nandranie Goodwin BSN,&nbsp;Sherita Holmes MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/aet2.11039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Intubation checklists have emerged as tools to reduce adverse events and improve efficiency during rapid sequence intubation (RSI) in pediatric emergency departments (PEDs). This study aimed to use multidisciplinary simulation (SIM) training as an educational tool to improve PED team performance during RSI scenarios through utilization of an RSI checklist.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We created a checklist modeled after previously published PED checklists. PED multidisciplinary teams participated in video-recorded SIM training sessions involving a scenario requiring intubation three times, first without interruption then while receiving our intervention of rapid-cycle deliberate practice (RCDP) debriefing focusing on checklist utilization and team dynamics. Learners went through the scenario once more uninterrupted to apply learned skills. Team performance was evaluated via video review using the Simulation Team Assessment Tool (STAT) focusing on airway management and human factors sections. Scores were compared before and after intervention along with pre- and postintervention surveys.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 483 learners participated in 64 SIM training sessions, 44 of whom met inclusion criteria and were included for data analysis. Scores increased postintervention for airway management, human factors and in total. Least-squares mean differences for total, airway, and human factors scores were 9.55 (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.24–11.85), 4.22 (95% CI 2.91–5.52), and 5.33 (95% CI 3.86–6.8), respectively, which was statistically significant with <i>p</i>-value of &lt;0.001 across all categories. Surveys demonstrated improved role understanding and checklist utilization comfort postintervention.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study supports the benefit of multidisciplinary SIM training with RCDP-style methodology as an educational method for improving airway management, teamwork skills, and RSI checklist utilization for PED staff. Incorporation of additional maintenance SIM sessions for ongoing education is likely to be further beneficial and would allow evaluation of degradation of skills over time following initial training.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AEM Education and Training\",\"volume\":\"8 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AEM Education and Training\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.11039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEM Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.11039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:插管核对表已成为儿科急诊室(PED)在快速顺序插管(RSI)过程中减少不良事件和提高效率的工具。本研究旨在利用多学科模拟(SIM)培训作为教育工具,通过使用 RSI 核对表来提高儿科急诊科团队在 RSI 场景中的表现:方法:我们仿照之前发布的 PED 核对表制作了一份核对表。PED 多学科团队参加了视频录制的 SIM 培训课程,其中涉及需要插管的情景三次,首先是不间断的,然后接受我们的快速循环刻意练习(RCDP)干预汇报,重点是核对表的使用和团队动态。学员在不间断的情况下再进行一次情景模拟,以应用所学技能。通过使用模拟团队评估工具(STAT)进行视频审查,对团队表现进行评估,重点是气道管理和人为因素部分。对干预前后的得分进行比较,并进行干预前后的调查:共有 483 名学员参加了 64 次 SIM 培训课程,其中 44 人符合纳入标准并被纳入数据分析。干预后,学员在气道管理、人为因素和总分方面的得分均有所提高。总分、气道和人为因素得分的最小二乘法平均差异分别为 9.55(95% 置信区间 [CI] 7.24-11.85)、4.22(95% CI 2.91-5.52)和 5.33(95% CI 3.86-6.8),具有统计学意义,P 值为 结论:本研究支持采用 RCDP 式方法进行多学科 SIM 培训,并将其作为一种教育方法,用于提高 PED 员工的气道管理、团队协作技能和 RSI 核对表使用率。纳入额外的维持性 SIM 课程以进行持续教育可能会带来更多益处,并可评估初始培训后随着时间推移出现的技能退化情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Use of in situ simulation to improve team performance and utilization of a rapid sequence intubation checklist

Background

Intubation checklists have emerged as tools to reduce adverse events and improve efficiency during rapid sequence intubation (RSI) in pediatric emergency departments (PEDs). This study aimed to use multidisciplinary simulation (SIM) training as an educational tool to improve PED team performance during RSI scenarios through utilization of an RSI checklist.

Methods

We created a checklist modeled after previously published PED checklists. PED multidisciplinary teams participated in video-recorded SIM training sessions involving a scenario requiring intubation three times, first without interruption then while receiving our intervention of rapid-cycle deliberate practice (RCDP) debriefing focusing on checklist utilization and team dynamics. Learners went through the scenario once more uninterrupted to apply learned skills. Team performance was evaluated via video review using the Simulation Team Assessment Tool (STAT) focusing on airway management and human factors sections. Scores were compared before and after intervention along with pre- and postintervention surveys.

Results

A total of 483 learners participated in 64 SIM training sessions, 44 of whom met inclusion criteria and were included for data analysis. Scores increased postintervention for airway management, human factors and in total. Least-squares mean differences for total, airway, and human factors scores were 9.55 (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.24–11.85), 4.22 (95% CI 2.91–5.52), and 5.33 (95% CI 3.86–6.8), respectively, which was statistically significant with p-value of <0.001 across all categories. Surveys demonstrated improved role understanding and checklist utilization comfort postintervention.

Conclusions

This study supports the benefit of multidisciplinary SIM training with RCDP-style methodology as an educational method for improving airway management, teamwork skills, and RSI checklist utilization for PED staff. Incorporation of additional maintenance SIM sessions for ongoing education is likely to be further beneficial and would allow evaluation of degradation of skills over time following initial training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AEM Education and Training
AEM Education and Training Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
89
期刊最新文献
AI passed the test, but can it make the rounds? Effects of opening a vertical care area on emergency medicine resident clinical experience. Precision education in medicine: A necessary transformation to better prepare physicians to meet the needs of their patients Use of in situ simulation to improve team performance and utilization of a rapid sequence intubation checklist Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1