深入了解利益相关者参与共同制作 "走出迷宫":治疗饮食失调症的严肃游戏的经历。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Journal of Eating Disorders Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1186/s40337-024-01136-3
Maria Mercedes Guala, Aida Bikic, Kim Bul, David Clinton, Anette Søgaard Nielsen, Helene Nygaard Nielsen, Martina Scarpelli, Luciana Schneider, Regina Christiansen
{"title":"深入了解利益相关者参与共同制作 \"走出迷宫\":治疗饮食失调症的严肃游戏的经历。","authors":"Maria Mercedes Guala, Aida Bikic, Kim Bul, David Clinton, Anette Søgaard Nielsen, Helene Nygaard Nielsen, Martina Scarpelli, Luciana Schneider, Regina Christiansen","doi":"10.1186/s40337-024-01136-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Co-production is increasingly used in mental health research and clinical settings. Maze Out is a digital game co-produced by clinicians, patients with eating disorders (EDs), an art director with lived experience in EDs, and a game-developing company. Maze Out is based on everyday challenges when suffering from EDs and is currently being evaluated as a supplement tool in EDs treatment. Several studies on co-producing mental health interventions focus on design and effectiveness, but the experiences of those involved in the co-production process remain unexplored. An in-depth exploration of stakeholders' experiences offers valuable insights into the impact of co-production on different groups and generates crucial knowledge for successful implementation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluated and explored the co-production process and the meaning that EDs patients, clinicians, and game designers attributed to their participation in the co-production of Maze Out. The objectives were to determine (1) how stakeholders experienced their collaboration in the co-production of Maze Out.; and (2) to what extent the stakeholders involved in developing Maze Out followed Cahn's principles of equality, diversity, accessibility, and reciprocity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five stakeholders (two patients, two clinicians, and a game designer) who participated in the co-production completed semi-structured interviews. Two patients and one clinician's diaries supplemented the interviews. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to interpret the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of this study highlight the importance of building a common language between clinicians, patients, and other professionals involved in developing new forms of treatment and interventions. A recommendation for researchers and clinicians to implement co-production in the future is that Cahn's principles: equality, reciprocity, accessibility, and diversity, serve as a strong foundation for successful co-production. In this study, three and partially one of the four Cahn's principles about co-production were identified: equality, reciprocity, and accessibility. When applied in an ED context, these principles provided stakeholders with valuable insights, enriching practice-based knowledge, using the knowledge applicable to clinical practice, and demonstrating their crucial role in fostering effective co-production processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":"12 1","pages":"178"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11566361/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An in-depth understanding of stakeholders' experiences about their participation in the co-production of 'Maze Out': a serious game for the treatment of eating disorders.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Mercedes Guala, Aida Bikic, Kim Bul, David Clinton, Anette Søgaard Nielsen, Helene Nygaard Nielsen, Martina Scarpelli, Luciana Schneider, Regina Christiansen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40337-024-01136-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Co-production is increasingly used in mental health research and clinical settings. Maze Out is a digital game co-produced by clinicians, patients with eating disorders (EDs), an art director with lived experience in EDs, and a game-developing company. Maze Out is based on everyday challenges when suffering from EDs and is currently being evaluated as a supplement tool in EDs treatment. Several studies on co-producing mental health interventions focus on design and effectiveness, but the experiences of those involved in the co-production process remain unexplored. An in-depth exploration of stakeholders' experiences offers valuable insights into the impact of co-production on different groups and generates crucial knowledge for successful implementation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluated and explored the co-production process and the meaning that EDs patients, clinicians, and game designers attributed to their participation in the co-production of Maze Out. The objectives were to determine (1) how stakeholders experienced their collaboration in the co-production of Maze Out.; and (2) to what extent the stakeholders involved in developing Maze Out followed Cahn's principles of equality, diversity, accessibility, and reciprocity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five stakeholders (two patients, two clinicians, and a game designer) who participated in the co-production completed semi-structured interviews. Two patients and one clinician's diaries supplemented the interviews. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to interpret the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of this study highlight the importance of building a common language between clinicians, patients, and other professionals involved in developing new forms of treatment and interventions. A recommendation for researchers and clinicians to implement co-production in the future is that Cahn's principles: equality, reciprocity, accessibility, and diversity, serve as a strong foundation for successful co-production. In this study, three and partially one of the four Cahn's principles about co-production were identified: equality, reciprocity, and accessibility. When applied in an ED context, these principles provided stakeholders with valuable insights, enriching practice-based knowledge, using the knowledge applicable to clinical practice, and demonstrating their crucial role in fostering effective co-production processes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"178\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11566361/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-024-01136-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-024-01136-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:共同制作越来越多地应用于心理健康研究和临床环境中。走出迷宫》是一款数字游戏,由临床医生、饮食失调症(EDs)患者、具有饮食失调症生活经验的艺术总监和一家游戏开发公司共同制作。走出迷宫 "基于饮食失调症患者的日常挑战,目前正在作为饮食失调症治疗的补充工具进行评估。关于共同制作心理健康干预措施的几项研究主要集中在设计和有效性方面,但对参与共同制作过程的人员的经历仍未进行深入探讨。对利益相关者的经验进行深入探讨,有助于深入了解共同制作对不同群体的影响,并为成功实施提供重要知识:本研究评估并探讨了共同制作过程,以及急诊室患者、临床医生和游戏设计者对参与《走出迷宫》共同制作的意义。目标是确定:(1)利益相关者如何体验他们在共同制作《走出迷宫》过程中的合作;(2)参与开发《走出迷宫》的利益相关者在多大程度上遵循了卡恩的平等、多样性、无障碍和互惠原则:参与共同制作的五名利益相关者(两名患者、两名临床医生和一名游戏设计师)完成了半结构化访谈。两名患者和一名临床医生的日记对访谈进行了补充。研究采用反思性主题分析法对数据进行解释:本研究的结果强调了在临床医生、患者和其他参与开发新型治疗和干预措施的专业人员之间建立共同语言的重要性。对研究人员和临床医生未来实施共同生产的建议是,卡恩的原则:平等、互惠、可及性和多样性,是共同生产取得成功的坚实基础。在本研究中,确定了卡恩关于共同生产的四项原则中的三项和部分一项:平等、互惠和无障碍。这些原则在应用于急诊室时,为利益相关者提供了宝贵的见解,丰富了以实践为基础的知识,将这些知识应用于临床实践,并证明了它们在促进有效的共同生产过程中的关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An in-depth understanding of stakeholders' experiences about their participation in the co-production of 'Maze Out': a serious game for the treatment of eating disorders.

Background: Co-production is increasingly used in mental health research and clinical settings. Maze Out is a digital game co-produced by clinicians, patients with eating disorders (EDs), an art director with lived experience in EDs, and a game-developing company. Maze Out is based on everyday challenges when suffering from EDs and is currently being evaluated as a supplement tool in EDs treatment. Several studies on co-producing mental health interventions focus on design and effectiveness, but the experiences of those involved in the co-production process remain unexplored. An in-depth exploration of stakeholders' experiences offers valuable insights into the impact of co-production on different groups and generates crucial knowledge for successful implementation.

Objectives: This study evaluated and explored the co-production process and the meaning that EDs patients, clinicians, and game designers attributed to their participation in the co-production of Maze Out. The objectives were to determine (1) how stakeholders experienced their collaboration in the co-production of Maze Out.; and (2) to what extent the stakeholders involved in developing Maze Out followed Cahn's principles of equality, diversity, accessibility, and reciprocity.

Methods: Five stakeholders (two patients, two clinicians, and a game designer) who participated in the co-production completed semi-structured interviews. Two patients and one clinician's diaries supplemented the interviews. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to interpret the data.

Results: The results of this study highlight the importance of building a common language between clinicians, patients, and other professionals involved in developing new forms of treatment and interventions. A recommendation for researchers and clinicians to implement co-production in the future is that Cahn's principles: equality, reciprocity, accessibility, and diversity, serve as a strong foundation for successful co-production. In this study, three and partially one of the four Cahn's principles about co-production were identified: equality, reciprocity, and accessibility. When applied in an ED context, these principles provided stakeholders with valuable insights, enriching practice-based knowledge, using the knowledge applicable to clinical practice, and demonstrating their crucial role in fostering effective co-production processes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Eating Disorders
Journal of Eating Disorders Neuroscience-Behavioral Neuroscience
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
17.10%
发文量
161
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Eating Disorders is the first open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing leading research in the science and clinical practice of eating disorders. It disseminates research that provides answers to the important issues and key challenges in the field of eating disorders and to facilitate translation of evidence into practice. The journal publishes research on all aspects of eating disorders namely their epidemiology, nature, determinants, neurobiology, prevention, treatment and outcomes. The scope includes, but is not limited to anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder and other eating disorders. Related areas such as important co-morbidities, obesity, body image, appetite, food and eating are also included. Articles about research methodology and assessment are welcomed where they advance the field of eating disorders.
期刊最新文献
From fixing to connecting: parents' experiences supporting adult children with eating disorders. Growing up in a larger body: youth- and parent-reported triggers for illness and barriers to recovery from anorexia nervosa. Correction: The role of impulsivity and binge eating in outpatients with overweight or obesity: an EEG temporal discounting study. Muscularity-oriented disordered eating: investigating body image concerns and the moderating role of emotion dysregulation in cyclists. Neurodivergence, intersectionality, and eating disorders: a lived experience-led narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1