Grace S Woodard, Elizabeth Lane, Jill Ehrenreich-May, Golda S Ginsburg, Amanda Jensen-Doss
{"title":"社区心理健康机构中青少年客户和临床医生对基于测量的护理忠诚度的预测。","authors":"Grace S Woodard, Elizabeth Lane, Jill Ehrenreich-May, Golda S Ginsburg, Amanda Jensen-Doss","doi":"10.1080/15374416.2024.2426123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Regularly administering outcome measures, measurement-based care (MBC), informs clinical decision-making and improves youth mental health. Understanding predictors of high-fidelity MBC delivery helps ensure all youth can benefit from this evidence-based practice. Research on client and clinician predictors of MBC fidelity has mixed findings.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants included 53 clinicians and 115 adolescents from a randomized controlled effectiveness trial with MBC only and MBC + Unified Protocol for the Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Adolescents (UPA) conditions. Clients and clinicians reported demographic information. Clinicians completed broad- and narrow-band attitude measures. MBC fidelity was operationalized using the implementation index, combining rates of administering and viewing questionnaires, using objective MBC data.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>The average MBC fidelity was 56.75% (<i>SD</i> = 30.36) and was significantly higher in the MBC only condition (<i>M</i> = 67.46%, <i>SD</i> = 27.63%) than in MBC + UPA condition (<i>M</i> = 46.58%, <i>SD</i> = 29.52%; <i>p</i> = .012). Clients identifying as White received significantly higher MBC fidelity than youth not identifying as White. Youth ethnicity, family income, age, severity, and number of sessions did not significantly predict MBC fidelity. Clinicians with less experience at their agency, less confidence, and who found manualized treatments less appealing, had significantly <i>higher</i> MBC fidelity than other clinicians. These results can inform future efforts to increase fidelity and <i>equity</i> in MBC delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":48350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adolescent Client and Clinician Predictors of Measurement-Based Care Fidelity in Community Mental Health Settings.\",\"authors\":\"Grace S Woodard, Elizabeth Lane, Jill Ehrenreich-May, Golda S Ginsburg, Amanda Jensen-Doss\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15374416.2024.2426123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Regularly administering outcome measures, measurement-based care (MBC), informs clinical decision-making and improves youth mental health. Understanding predictors of high-fidelity MBC delivery helps ensure all youth can benefit from this evidence-based practice. Research on client and clinician predictors of MBC fidelity has mixed findings.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants included 53 clinicians and 115 adolescents from a randomized controlled effectiveness trial with MBC only and MBC + Unified Protocol for the Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Adolescents (UPA) conditions. Clients and clinicians reported demographic information. Clinicians completed broad- and narrow-band attitude measures. MBC fidelity was operationalized using the implementation index, combining rates of administering and viewing questionnaires, using objective MBC data.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>The average MBC fidelity was 56.75% (<i>SD</i> = 30.36) and was significantly higher in the MBC only condition (<i>M</i> = 67.46%, <i>SD</i> = 27.63%) than in MBC + UPA condition (<i>M</i> = 46.58%, <i>SD</i> = 29.52%; <i>p</i> = .012). Clients identifying as White received significantly higher MBC fidelity than youth not identifying as White. Youth ethnicity, family income, age, severity, and number of sessions did not significantly predict MBC fidelity. Clinicians with less experience at their agency, less confidence, and who found manualized treatments less appealing, had significantly <i>higher</i> MBC fidelity than other clinicians. These results can inform future efforts to increase fidelity and <i>equity</i> in MBC delivery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2024.2426123\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2024.2426123","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:定期实施结果测量,即基于测量的护理(MBC),可为临床决策提供信息并改善青少年的心理健康。了解高保真 MBC 实施的预测因素有助于确保所有青少年都能从这一循证实践中受益。有关客户和临床医生对 MBC 忠实度预测因素的研究结果不一:参与者包括53名临床医生和115名青少年,他们来自一项随机对照有效性试验,试验条件包括仅MBC和MBC+青少年情绪障碍跨诊断治疗统一方案(UPA)。客户和临床医生报告了人口统计学信息。临床医生完成了宽带和窄带态度测量。利用客观的 MBC 数据,结合问卷的实施率和查看率,使用实施指数对 MBC 的忠实度进行操作:MBC 的平均忠实度为 56.75%(SD = 30.36),仅 MBC 条件下的忠实度(M = 67.46%,SD = 27.63%)明显高于 MBC + UPA 条件下的忠实度(M = 46.58%,SD = 29.52%;P = .012)。白人客户的 MBC 忠实度明显高于非白人青年。青少年的种族、家庭收入、年龄、严重程度和治疗次数并不能显著预测 MBC 的忠实度。与其他临床医生相比,在其机构工作经验较少、自信心较弱以及认为手册化治疗方法不那么吸引人的临床医生的 MBC 忠实度要高得多。这些结果可以为今后提高 MBC 治疗的忠实度和公平性提供参考。
Adolescent Client and Clinician Predictors of Measurement-Based Care Fidelity in Community Mental Health Settings.
Objective: Regularly administering outcome measures, measurement-based care (MBC), informs clinical decision-making and improves youth mental health. Understanding predictors of high-fidelity MBC delivery helps ensure all youth can benefit from this evidence-based practice. Research on client and clinician predictors of MBC fidelity has mixed findings.
Method: Participants included 53 clinicians and 115 adolescents from a randomized controlled effectiveness trial with MBC only and MBC + Unified Protocol for the Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Adolescents (UPA) conditions. Clients and clinicians reported demographic information. Clinicians completed broad- and narrow-band attitude measures. MBC fidelity was operationalized using the implementation index, combining rates of administering and viewing questionnaires, using objective MBC data.
Results and discussion: The average MBC fidelity was 56.75% (SD = 30.36) and was significantly higher in the MBC only condition (M = 67.46%, SD = 27.63%) than in MBC + UPA condition (M = 46.58%, SD = 29.52%; p = .012). Clients identifying as White received significantly higher MBC fidelity than youth not identifying as White. Youth ethnicity, family income, age, severity, and number of sessions did not significantly predict MBC fidelity. Clinicians with less experience at their agency, less confidence, and who found manualized treatments less appealing, had significantly higher MBC fidelity than other clinicians. These results can inform future efforts to increase fidelity and equity in MBC delivery.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology (JCCAP) is the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association. It publishes original contributions on the following topics: (a) the development and evaluation of assessment and intervention techniques for use with clinical child and adolescent populations; (b) the development and maintenance of clinical child and adolescent problems; (c) cross-cultural and sociodemographic issues that have a clear bearing on clinical child and adolescent psychology in terms of theory, research, or practice; and (d) training and professional practice in clinical child and adolescent psychology, as well as child advocacy.