探索反思性道德自我效能感与行为道德自我效能感之间的相互关系:从代理的角度来阻碍工作中的道德脱离。

IF 3.3 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Psychology Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1002/ijop.13268
Marinella Paciello, Roberta Fida, Claudio Barbaranelli, Carlo Tramontano
{"title":"探索反思性道德自我效能感与行为道德自我效能感之间的相互关系:从代理的角度来阻碍工作中的道德脱离。","authors":"Marinella Paciello, Roberta Fida, Claudio Barbaranelli, Carlo Tramontano","doi":"10.1002/ijop.13268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Moral self-efficacy refers to individuals' beliefs in their capability to effectively mobilise motivation, cognitive resources and strategic actions to achieve moral performance particularly in challenging situations. We adopt the conceptualization of moral self-efficacy that encompasses both self-reflective and behavioural components. The self-reflective dimension pertains to one's perceived capability to reflect on past moral lapses, while the behavioural dimension involves one's perceived capability to regulate future moral conduct. The study aims to explore moral self-efficacy as a \"dynamic\" process unfolding over time, focusing on the reciprocal influence between its self-reflective and behavioural dimensions in hindering the development of moral disengagement. Utilising a three-wave design with a sample of 1308 employees (50% females) at Time 1 results of a structural equation model support the hypothesized interplay between self-reflective and behavioural moral self-efficacy over time. In addition, our findings partly support our hypothesized relationships between moral self-efficacy dimensions and moral disengagement: self-reflective moral self-efficacy directly and negatively influenced the development of moral disengagement over time, while behavioural moral self-efficacy negative influenced it only indirectly through self-reflective moral self-efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":48146,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"e13268"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the reciprocal relationship between reflective and behavioural moral self-efficacy: An agentic perspective to hinder moral disengagement at work.\",\"authors\":\"Marinella Paciello, Roberta Fida, Claudio Barbaranelli, Carlo Tramontano\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ijop.13268\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Moral self-efficacy refers to individuals' beliefs in their capability to effectively mobilise motivation, cognitive resources and strategic actions to achieve moral performance particularly in challenging situations. We adopt the conceptualization of moral self-efficacy that encompasses both self-reflective and behavioural components. The self-reflective dimension pertains to one's perceived capability to reflect on past moral lapses, while the behavioural dimension involves one's perceived capability to regulate future moral conduct. The study aims to explore moral self-efficacy as a \\\"dynamic\\\" process unfolding over time, focusing on the reciprocal influence between its self-reflective and behavioural dimensions in hindering the development of moral disengagement. Utilising a three-wave design with a sample of 1308 employees (50% females) at Time 1 results of a structural equation model support the hypothesized interplay between self-reflective and behavioural moral self-efficacy over time. In addition, our findings partly support our hypothesized relationships between moral self-efficacy dimensions and moral disengagement: self-reflective moral self-efficacy directly and negatively influenced the development of moral disengagement over time, while behavioural moral self-efficacy negative influenced it only indirectly through self-reflective moral self-efficacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e13268\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.13268\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.13268","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

道德自我效能感是指个人相信自己有能力有效地调动动机、认知资源和战略行动来实现道德表现,尤其是在具有挑战性的情况下。我们采用的道德自我效能概念包括自我反思和行为两个方面。自我反省维度涉及一个人对过去道德失误进行反省的感知能力,而行为维度则涉及一个人对未来道德行为进行调节的感知能力。本研究旨在探讨道德自我效能感作为一个随着时间推移而展开的 "动态 "过程,重点关注其自我反省维度和行为维度之间在阻碍道德失范发展方面的相互影响。结构方程模型的结果支持了自我反省和行为道德自我效能感之间随着时间推移而相互作用的假设。此外,我们的研究结果部分支持了道德自我效能维度与道德脱离之间的假设关系:随着时间的推移,自我反省道德自我效能直接对道德脱离的发展产生负面影响,而行为道德自我效能仅通过自我反省道德自我效能间接对其产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring the reciprocal relationship between reflective and behavioural moral self-efficacy: An agentic perspective to hinder moral disengagement at work.

Moral self-efficacy refers to individuals' beliefs in their capability to effectively mobilise motivation, cognitive resources and strategic actions to achieve moral performance particularly in challenging situations. We adopt the conceptualization of moral self-efficacy that encompasses both self-reflective and behavioural components. The self-reflective dimension pertains to one's perceived capability to reflect on past moral lapses, while the behavioural dimension involves one's perceived capability to regulate future moral conduct. The study aims to explore moral self-efficacy as a "dynamic" process unfolding over time, focusing on the reciprocal influence between its self-reflective and behavioural dimensions in hindering the development of moral disengagement. Utilising a three-wave design with a sample of 1308 employees (50% females) at Time 1 results of a structural equation model support the hypothesized interplay between self-reflective and behavioural moral self-efficacy over time. In addition, our findings partly support our hypothesized relationships between moral self-efficacy dimensions and moral disengagement: self-reflective moral self-efficacy directly and negatively influenced the development of moral disengagement over time, while behavioural moral self-efficacy negative influenced it only indirectly through self-reflective moral self-efficacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Psychology
International Journal of Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Psychology (IJP) is the journal of the International Union of Psychological Science (IUPsyS) and is published under the auspices of the Union. IJP seeks to support the IUPsyS in fostering the development of international psychological science. It aims to strengthen the dialog within psychology around the world and to facilitate communication among different areas of psychology and among psychologists from different cultural backgrounds. IJP is the outlet for empirical basic and applied studies and for reviews that either (a) incorporate perspectives from different areas or domains within psychology or across different disciplines, (b) test the culture-dependent validity of psychological theories, or (c) integrate literature from different regions in the world.
期刊最新文献
Impact of French lockdowns on bereavement experiences: Insight from ALCESTE analysis revealing psychological resilience and distinct grief dynamics amidst COVID-19. Virtual motivational interviewing for physical activity among older adults: A non-randomised, mixed-methods feasibility study. Dimensionality in confirmatory factor analysis is not in the eye of the beholder: Ancillary bifactor statistical indices illuminate dimensionality and reliability. Getting started with the graded response model: An introduction and tutorial in R. Profiles of intergenerational and digital solidarity between middle-aged parents and young adult children during the COVID-19 pandemic: Associations with parents' psychological well-being.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1