使用紧急情况严重程度指数进行分流分类的准确性。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING International Emergency Nursing Pub Date : 2024-11-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ienj.2024.101537
Krisada Suamchaiyaphum , Allison R. Jones , Shea Polancich
{"title":"使用紧急情况严重程度指数进行分流分类的准确性。","authors":"Krisada Suamchaiyaphum ,&nbsp;Allison R. Jones ,&nbsp;Shea Polancich","doi":"10.1016/j.ienj.2024.101537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Accurate emergency triage is essential for timely and appropriate care based on patient acuity. We sought to evaluate triage accuracy among emergency department (ED) nurses and examine potential influencing factors.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted an observational study using an electronic medical record chart review of 100 patients admitted at one of three EDs in a large academic medical system in the southern United States from December 1 to 7, 2021. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. We compared the nurses’ initial assigned triage acuity level documented in the medical chart with triage acuity assigned using the Emergency Severity Index Version 4 handbook and assessed inter-rater agreement using Cohen’s kappa coefficient.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall triage accuracy was 67%, with most patients (62%) triaged as ESI level 3; under- and over-triage occurred in 25% and 8% of cases, respectively. Cohen’s kappa coefficient was 0.437, indicating moderate interrater reliability between the triage nurses and the ESI handbook. Triage accuracy varied across ED locations and patient characteristics of sex (male: 55.6%, female: 72.3%), type of complaint (trauma: 57.1%, non-trauma: 69.4%), shift (day: 63.5%, night: 73.0%), and mode of arrival (ambulance: 80.8%, ambulatory: 65.2%, and private vehicle: 37.5%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Triage inaccuracy may be attributed to a combination of nursing- and patient-specific factors. Further study of those factors associated with triage accuracy is warranted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48914,"journal":{"name":"International Emergency Nursing","volume":"77 ","pages":"Article 101537"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The accuracy of triage classification using Emergency Severity Index\",\"authors\":\"Krisada Suamchaiyaphum ,&nbsp;Allison R. Jones ,&nbsp;Shea Polancich\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ienj.2024.101537\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Accurate emergency triage is essential for timely and appropriate care based on patient acuity. We sought to evaluate triage accuracy among emergency department (ED) nurses and examine potential influencing factors.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted an observational study using an electronic medical record chart review of 100 patients admitted at one of three EDs in a large academic medical system in the southern United States from December 1 to 7, 2021. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. We compared the nurses’ initial assigned triage acuity level documented in the medical chart with triage acuity assigned using the Emergency Severity Index Version 4 handbook and assessed inter-rater agreement using Cohen’s kappa coefficient.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall triage accuracy was 67%, with most patients (62%) triaged as ESI level 3; under- and over-triage occurred in 25% and 8% of cases, respectively. Cohen’s kappa coefficient was 0.437, indicating moderate interrater reliability between the triage nurses and the ESI handbook. Triage accuracy varied across ED locations and patient characteristics of sex (male: 55.6%, female: 72.3%), type of complaint (trauma: 57.1%, non-trauma: 69.4%), shift (day: 63.5%, night: 73.0%), and mode of arrival (ambulance: 80.8%, ambulatory: 65.2%, and private vehicle: 37.5%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Triage inaccuracy may be attributed to a combination of nursing- and patient-specific factors. Further study of those factors associated with triage accuracy is warranted.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Emergency Nursing\",\"volume\":\"77 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101537\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Emergency Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755599X24001320\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755599X24001320","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介准确的急诊分诊对于根据患者的严重程度及时提供适当的护理至关重要。我们试图评估急诊科(ED)护士的分诊准确性,并研究潜在的影响因素:我们使用电子病历对美国南部一家大型学术医疗系统的三个急诊科之一在 2021 年 12 月 1 日至 7 日期间收治的 100 名患者进行了观察研究。我们使用描述性统计来总结数据。我们将病历中记录的护士最初指定的分诊严重程度与使用《急诊严重程度指数第4版手册》指定的分诊严重程度进行了比较,并使用科恩卡帕系数评估了评分者之间的一致性:总体分诊准确率为 67%,大多数患者(62%)被分诊为 ESI 3 级;分诊不足和分诊过度分别占 25% 和 8%。科恩卡帕系数(Cohen's kappa coefficient)为 0.437,表明分诊护士和 ESI 手册之间的互评可靠性处于中等水平。分诊准确率因急诊室地点和患者性别(男性:55.6%,女性:72.3%)、主诉类型(创伤:57.1%,非创伤:69.4%)、轮班(白班:63.5%,夜班:73.0%)和到达方式(救护车:80.8%,门诊:65.2%,私家车:37.5%)而异:结论:分诊不准确可能是由护理因素和患者特定因素共同造成的。结论:分诊不准确可能是由护理人员和患者的特定因素共同造成的,因此有必要对这些与分诊准确性相关的因素进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The accuracy of triage classification using Emergency Severity Index

Introduction

Accurate emergency triage is essential for timely and appropriate care based on patient acuity. We sought to evaluate triage accuracy among emergency department (ED) nurses and examine potential influencing factors.

Methods

We conducted an observational study using an electronic medical record chart review of 100 patients admitted at one of three EDs in a large academic medical system in the southern United States from December 1 to 7, 2021. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. We compared the nurses’ initial assigned triage acuity level documented in the medical chart with triage acuity assigned using the Emergency Severity Index Version 4 handbook and assessed inter-rater agreement using Cohen’s kappa coefficient.

Results

Overall triage accuracy was 67%, with most patients (62%) triaged as ESI level 3; under- and over-triage occurred in 25% and 8% of cases, respectively. Cohen’s kappa coefficient was 0.437, indicating moderate interrater reliability between the triage nurses and the ESI handbook. Triage accuracy varied across ED locations and patient characteristics of sex (male: 55.6%, female: 72.3%), type of complaint (trauma: 57.1%, non-trauma: 69.4%), shift (day: 63.5%, night: 73.0%), and mode of arrival (ambulance: 80.8%, ambulatory: 65.2%, and private vehicle: 37.5%).

Conclusion

Triage inaccuracy may be attributed to a combination of nursing- and patient-specific factors. Further study of those factors associated with triage accuracy is warranted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: International Emergency Nursing is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to nurses and other professionals involved in emergency care. It aims to promote excellence through dissemination of high quality research findings, specialist knowledge and discussion of professional issues that reflect the diversity of this field. With an international readership and authorship, it provides a platform for practitioners worldwide to communicate and enhance the evidence-base of emergency care. The journal publishes a broad range of papers, from personal reflection to primary research findings, created by first-time through to reputable authors from a number of disciplines. It brings together research from practice, education, theory, and operational management, relevant to all levels of staff working in emergency care settings worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Determination of the relationship between competencies in disaster nursing management and perceived stress: The intermediary role of resilience Emergency medical service nurses’ experiences and perspectives on a protocol change of pre-hospital preventive immobilization of spinal injuries after trauma: A qualitative study Decreasing hemolysis rates through phlebotomy education The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in cancer criteria. An Evaluation and recommendations for the management of neutropenia in the emergency department What is the optimal outcome for evaluating the triage Systems? Insights from a prospective observational study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1