大规模伤亡事件模拟中的分诊伦理:现象学探索。

IF 2.9 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS Nursing Ethics Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1177/09697330241299526
Adrianna Lorraine Watson, Jeanette Drake, Matthew Anderson, Sondra Heaston, Pyper Schmutz, Calvin Reed, Rylie Rasmussen
{"title":"大规模伤亡事件模拟中的分诊伦理:现象学探索。","authors":"Adrianna Lorraine Watson, Jeanette Drake, Matthew Anderson, Sondra Heaston, Pyper Schmutz, Calvin Reed, Rylie Rasmussen","doi":"10.1177/09697330241299526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Disaster scenarios challenge both novice and experienced nurses to navigate complex ethical dilemmas in resource-limited environments. Traditional nursing education often leaves new nurses unprepared for the ethical demands of disaster nursing. Utilitarianism must often guide triage ethics and decision-making. There is a critical need to equip nursing students with these ethical competencies.</p><p><strong>Research question/aim: </strong>This study explores nursing students' lived experiences using introductory triage ethics in mass casualty incident simulation (MCIS).</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>A qualitative, interpretive phenomenological approach was employed, analyzing reflective journal responses from senior nursing students following MCIS participation.</p><p><strong>Participants and research context: </strong>Participants were senior-year nursing students from a private university in the U.S., engaging in MCIS as part of their curriculum, which simulated resource-limited disaster scenarios requiring real-time ethical decisions.</p><p><strong>Ethical considerations: </strong>The study received Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, and participants provided informed consent. Data were anonymized and did not affect academic evaluation.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Two major themes emerged: 1. <b>Living in Ethical Dilemmas</b> (subthemes: <i>We Could Have Saved Them If…</i>, <i>Looking Past Obvious Suffering</i>, <i>How Can We Be Prepared?</i>, <i>We Can't Abandon Them</i>). 2. <b>Development of Ethical Competency</b> (subthemes: <i>Knowing You've Done Enough</i>, <i>Finding New Perspectives</i>, <i>There Is No Right Answer</i>). Students grew in moral reasoning and emotional resilience, transitioning from patient-centered care to utilitarian decision-making.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participation in the mass casualty incident simulation allowed nursing students to confront and navigate complex ethical challenges in real time, fostering significant growth in moral reasoning and emotional resilience. Through immersion in simulated ethical dilemmas, students grappled with the tension between patient-centered care and the realities of utilitarian decision-making. This experience catalyzed a deeper understanding of ethical ambiguity and the development of moral clarity, equipping them with foundational skills for ethically navigating crises. Nursing curricula should recognize and incorporate opportunities that facilitate this ethical growth through experiential learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":49729,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"9697330241299526"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Triage ethics in mass casualty incident simulation: A phenomenological exploration.\",\"authors\":\"Adrianna Lorraine Watson, Jeanette Drake, Matthew Anderson, Sondra Heaston, Pyper Schmutz, Calvin Reed, Rylie Rasmussen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09697330241299526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Disaster scenarios challenge both novice and experienced nurses to navigate complex ethical dilemmas in resource-limited environments. Traditional nursing education often leaves new nurses unprepared for the ethical demands of disaster nursing. Utilitarianism must often guide triage ethics and decision-making. There is a critical need to equip nursing students with these ethical competencies.</p><p><strong>Research question/aim: </strong>This study explores nursing students' lived experiences using introductory triage ethics in mass casualty incident simulation (MCIS).</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>A qualitative, interpretive phenomenological approach was employed, analyzing reflective journal responses from senior nursing students following MCIS participation.</p><p><strong>Participants and research context: </strong>Participants were senior-year nursing students from a private university in the U.S., engaging in MCIS as part of their curriculum, which simulated resource-limited disaster scenarios requiring real-time ethical decisions.</p><p><strong>Ethical considerations: </strong>The study received Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, and participants provided informed consent. Data were anonymized and did not affect academic evaluation.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Two major themes emerged: 1. <b>Living in Ethical Dilemmas</b> (subthemes: <i>We Could Have Saved Them If…</i>, <i>Looking Past Obvious Suffering</i>, <i>How Can We Be Prepared?</i>, <i>We Can't Abandon Them</i>). 2. <b>Development of Ethical Competency</b> (subthemes: <i>Knowing You've Done Enough</i>, <i>Finding New Perspectives</i>, <i>There Is No Right Answer</i>). Students grew in moral reasoning and emotional resilience, transitioning from patient-centered care to utilitarian decision-making.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participation in the mass casualty incident simulation allowed nursing students to confront and navigate complex ethical challenges in real time, fostering significant growth in moral reasoning and emotional resilience. Through immersion in simulated ethical dilemmas, students grappled with the tension between patient-centered care and the realities of utilitarian decision-making. This experience catalyzed a deeper understanding of ethical ambiguity and the development of moral clarity, equipping them with foundational skills for ethically navigating crises. Nursing curricula should recognize and incorporate opportunities that facilitate this ethical growth through experiential learning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Ethics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"9697330241299526\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330241299526\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330241299526","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在资源有限的环境中,新手护士和经验丰富的护士都要应对复杂的伦理困境,而灾难情景正是对他们的挑战。传统的护理教育往往让新护士对灾难护理的伦理要求毫无准备。功利主义往往必须指导分诊伦理和决策。研究问题/目的:本研究探讨了护理专业学生在大规模伤亡事件模拟(MCIS)中使用分诊伦理入门的生活经验:研究设计:采用定性、解释性现象学方法,分析高年级护理专业学生在参与 MCIS 后的反思性日志回复:参与者为美国一所私立大学的高年级护理专业学生,MCIS 是他们课程的一部分,模拟了资源有限、需要实时做出伦理决定的灾难场景:本研究获得了机构审查委员会(IRB)的批准,参与者提供了知情同意书。数据已匿名,不影响学术评价:出现了两大主题:1.生活在伦理困境中(副主题:如果我们能救他们,他们会怎样?如果......,我们本可以救他们;看淡明显的痛苦;我们该如何做好准备;我们不能抛弃他们)。2.道德能力的培养(副主题:知道你做得够多了吗?知道你已经做得够多了、寻找新视角、没有正确答案)。学生的道德推理能力和情绪恢复能力得到提高,从以病人为中心的护理过渡到功利性决策:结论:参加大规模伤亡事件模拟活动使护理专业学生能够实时面对和驾驭复杂的伦理挑战,促进了道德推理能力和情绪恢复能力的显著提高。通过沉浸在模拟伦理困境中,学生们努力应对以病人为中心的护理与功利决策现实之间的矛盾。这种体验促使学生加深了对伦理模糊性的理解,培养了清晰的道德观,使他们具备了从伦理角度驾驭危机的基本技能。护理课程应认识到并纳入通过体验式学习促进这种道德成长的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Triage ethics in mass casualty incident simulation: A phenomenological exploration.

Background: Disaster scenarios challenge both novice and experienced nurses to navigate complex ethical dilemmas in resource-limited environments. Traditional nursing education often leaves new nurses unprepared for the ethical demands of disaster nursing. Utilitarianism must often guide triage ethics and decision-making. There is a critical need to equip nursing students with these ethical competencies.

Research question/aim: This study explores nursing students' lived experiences using introductory triage ethics in mass casualty incident simulation (MCIS).

Research design: A qualitative, interpretive phenomenological approach was employed, analyzing reflective journal responses from senior nursing students following MCIS participation.

Participants and research context: Participants were senior-year nursing students from a private university in the U.S., engaging in MCIS as part of their curriculum, which simulated resource-limited disaster scenarios requiring real-time ethical decisions.

Ethical considerations: The study received Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, and participants provided informed consent. Data were anonymized and did not affect academic evaluation.

Findings: Two major themes emerged: 1. Living in Ethical Dilemmas (subthemes: We Could Have Saved Them If…, Looking Past Obvious Suffering, How Can We Be Prepared?, We Can't Abandon Them). 2. Development of Ethical Competency (subthemes: Knowing You've Done Enough, Finding New Perspectives, There Is No Right Answer). Students grew in moral reasoning and emotional resilience, transitioning from patient-centered care to utilitarian decision-making.

Conclusions: Participation in the mass casualty incident simulation allowed nursing students to confront and navigate complex ethical challenges in real time, fostering significant growth in moral reasoning and emotional resilience. Through immersion in simulated ethical dilemmas, students grappled with the tension between patient-centered care and the realities of utilitarian decision-making. This experience catalyzed a deeper understanding of ethical ambiguity and the development of moral clarity, equipping them with foundational skills for ethically navigating crises. Nursing curricula should recognize and incorporate opportunities that facilitate this ethical growth through experiential learning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Ethics
Nursing Ethics 医学-护理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.90%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Ethics takes a practical approach to this complex subject and relates each topic to the working environment. The articles on ethical and legal issues are written in a comprehensible style and official documents are analysed in a user-friendly way. The international Editorial Board ensures the selection of a wide range of high quality articles of global significance.
期刊最新文献
Sources of moral distress in nursing professionals: A scoping review. Truth-telling, and ethical considerations in terminal care: an Eastern perspective. Ethical considerations in the UK-Nepal nurse recruitment: Nepali nurses' perspectives. Nurses on the outside, problems on the inside! The duty of nurses to support unions. Care and justice reasoning in nurses' everyday ethics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1