有认知障碍的老年人脑脊液生物标记物、脑18-氟脱氧葡萄糖PET与临床诊断之间的一致性

Mimenza-Alvarado Alberto J, León-Del-Ángel Karen G, Hernández-Ramírez Rodrigo, Rodríguez-Callejas Juan de D, Yeverino-Castro Sara G, Aguilar-Navarro Sara G
{"title":"有认知障碍的老年人脑脊液生物标记物、脑18-氟脱氧葡萄糖PET与临床诊断之间的一致性","authors":"Mimenza-Alvarado Alberto J, León-Del-Ángel Karen G, Hernández-Ramírez Rodrigo, Rodríguez-Callejas Juan de D, Yeverino-Castro Sara G, Aguilar-Navarro Sara G","doi":"10.24875/RIC.24000161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unassigned: </strong>Background: Clinical practice has advanced toward a combined diagnostic approach that involves clinical criteria and biological markers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other dementias. Objective: To establish the level of diagnostic agreement between an initial clinical diagnosis and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) biomarkers in a cohort of patients from a memory clinic. Methods: This is a observational, retrospective, cohort study conducted at an outpatient memory clinic. Between July 2018 and September 2023, data from adults' ≥ 55 years with a mild cognitive impairment or dementia diagnosis without etiological diagnosis were obtained, complemented with the evaluation of biomarkers in CSF and [18F] FDG-PET biomarker assessment were included. Kappa coefficients (κ) were used to establish the level of agreement between CSF and [18F] FDG-PET results. Results: Seventy-seven patients had an available [18F] FDG-PET scan, and 25 (32.5%) had both biomarkers. We observed a fair-to-moderate diagnostic agreement between patients' initial and their final diagnosis in the presence of CSF (κ = 0.233, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.099-0.566) and [18F] FDG-PET (κ = 0.451, 95% CI: 0.277-0.625, p < 0.001) results. The Kappa value for diagnostic concordance between [18F] FDG-PET and CSF to differentiate between AD and other dementias was 0.733 (95% CI: 0.425-1.000, p < 0.005). Conclusion: This study demonstrates good agreement between the CSF and FDG-PET biomarkers to differentiate AD from other dementias. (Rev Invest Clin. 2024;76(5):230-7).</p>","PeriodicalId":49612,"journal":{"name":"Revista De Investigacion Clinica-Clinical and Translational Investigation","volume":"76 5","pages":"230-237"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agreement between Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers, Brain 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET, and Clinical Diagnosis in Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment.\",\"authors\":\"Mimenza-Alvarado Alberto J, León-Del-Ángel Karen G, Hernández-Ramírez Rodrigo, Rodríguez-Callejas Juan de D, Yeverino-Castro Sara G, Aguilar-Navarro Sara G\",\"doi\":\"10.24875/RIC.24000161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Unassigned: </strong>Background: Clinical practice has advanced toward a combined diagnostic approach that involves clinical criteria and biological markers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other dementias. Objective: To establish the level of diagnostic agreement between an initial clinical diagnosis and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) biomarkers in a cohort of patients from a memory clinic. Methods: This is a observational, retrospective, cohort study conducted at an outpatient memory clinic. Between July 2018 and September 2023, data from adults' ≥ 55 years with a mild cognitive impairment or dementia diagnosis without etiological diagnosis were obtained, complemented with the evaluation of biomarkers in CSF and [18F] FDG-PET biomarker assessment were included. Kappa coefficients (κ) were used to establish the level of agreement between CSF and [18F] FDG-PET results. Results: Seventy-seven patients had an available [18F] FDG-PET scan, and 25 (32.5%) had both biomarkers. We observed a fair-to-moderate diagnostic agreement between patients' initial and their final diagnosis in the presence of CSF (κ = 0.233, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.099-0.566) and [18F] FDG-PET (κ = 0.451, 95% CI: 0.277-0.625, p < 0.001) results. The Kappa value for diagnostic concordance between [18F] FDG-PET and CSF to differentiate between AD and other dementias was 0.733 (95% CI: 0.425-1.000, p < 0.005). Conclusion: This study demonstrates good agreement between the CSF and FDG-PET biomarkers to differentiate AD from other dementias. (Rev Invest Clin. 2024;76(5):230-7).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista De Investigacion Clinica-Clinical and Translational Investigation\",\"volume\":\"76 5\",\"pages\":\"230-237\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista De Investigacion Clinica-Clinical and Translational Investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24875/RIC.24000161\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista De Investigacion Clinica-Clinical and Translational Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/RIC.24000161","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

未分配:背景:临床实践中,阿尔茨海默病(AD)和其他痴呆症的临床标准与生物标志物相结合的诊断方法已取得进展。目的在记忆诊所的一组患者中确定初步临床诊断与脑脊液(CSF)和[18F]-氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)-正电子发射断层扫描(PET)生物标记物之间的诊断一致性水平。方法:这是一项在记忆门诊进行的观察性、回顾性队列研究。在 2018 年 7 月至 2023 年 9 月期间,获得了年龄≥ 55 岁、有轻度认知障碍或痴呆诊断但无病因诊断的成年人的数据,并对 CSF 中的生物标志物进行了评估,同时纳入了[18F] FDG-PET 生物标志物评估。卡帕系数(κ)用于确定脑脊液和[18F] FDG-PET结果之间的一致程度。结果77名患者接受了[18F] FDG-PET扫描,其中25名患者(32.5%)同时接受了两种生物标记物的扫描。我们观察到,在 CSF(κ = 0.233,95% 置信区间 [CI]:-0.099-0.566)和 [18F] FDG-PET (κ = 0.451,95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.277-0.625,p < 0.001)结果存在的情况下,患者的初步诊断与最终诊断之间存在相当到中等程度的诊断一致性。[18F]FDG-PET和CSF在区分AD和其他痴呆症方面的诊断一致性Kappa值为0.733(95% CI:0.425-1.000,p <0.005)。结论本研究表明,CSF 和 FDG-PET 生物标记物在区分 AD 和其他痴呆症方面具有良好的一致性。(Rev Invest Clin.2024;76(5):230-7).
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Agreement between Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers, Brain 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET, and Clinical Diagnosis in Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment.

Unassigned: Background: Clinical practice has advanced toward a combined diagnostic approach that involves clinical criteria and biological markers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other dementias. Objective: To establish the level of diagnostic agreement between an initial clinical diagnosis and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) biomarkers in a cohort of patients from a memory clinic. Methods: This is a observational, retrospective, cohort study conducted at an outpatient memory clinic. Between July 2018 and September 2023, data from adults' ≥ 55 years with a mild cognitive impairment or dementia diagnosis without etiological diagnosis were obtained, complemented with the evaluation of biomarkers in CSF and [18F] FDG-PET biomarker assessment were included. Kappa coefficients (κ) were used to establish the level of agreement between CSF and [18F] FDG-PET results. Results: Seventy-seven patients had an available [18F] FDG-PET scan, and 25 (32.5%) had both biomarkers. We observed a fair-to-moderate diagnostic agreement between patients' initial and their final diagnosis in the presence of CSF (κ = 0.233, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.099-0.566) and [18F] FDG-PET (κ = 0.451, 95% CI: 0.277-0.625, p < 0.001) results. The Kappa value for diagnostic concordance between [18F] FDG-PET and CSF to differentiate between AD and other dementias was 0.733 (95% CI: 0.425-1.000, p < 0.005). Conclusion: This study demonstrates good agreement between the CSF and FDG-PET biomarkers to differentiate AD from other dementias. (Rev Invest Clin. 2024;76(5):230-7).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista de Investigación Clínica – Clinical and Translational Investigation (RIC-C&TI), publishes original clinical and biomedical research of interest to physicians in internal medicine, surgery, and any of their specialties. The Revista de Investigación Clínica – Clinical and Translational Investigation is the official journal of the National Institutes of Health of Mexico, which comprises a group of Institutes and High Specialty Hospitals belonging to the Ministery of Health. The journal is published both on-line and in printed version, appears bimonthly and publishes peer-reviewed original research articles as well as brief and in-depth reviews. All articles published are open access and can be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. The journal accepts clinical and molecular research articles, short reports and reviews. Types of manuscripts: – Brief Communications – Research Letters – Original Articles – Brief Reviews – In-depth Reviews – Perspectives – Letters to the Editor
期刊最新文献
Proposal of a functional prognostic scale in mexican patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome. LINC01614 activated by SP1 promoted malignant behavior of triple-negative breast cancer cells via the WNT/b-Catenin signaling pathway. Expanding Diagnostic Workup for hypertensive Intracerebral hemorrhage: a retrospective LATAM cerebrovascular registry comparison. Genotypes distribution of the SNP RS1477196 of FTO gen associated with primary knee osteoarthritis in females: an analysis using the 100Genomes database. Validation of the HAS-BLED scale for the assessment of bleeding risk in patients on anticoagulation therapy with a diagnosis of venous thromboembolic disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1