新药 2 型糖尿病患者的实际治疗模式:初始联合疗法与序贯阶梯疗法。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of the American Pharmacists Association Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1016/j.japh.2024.102295
Zahra Majd, Hua Chen, Michael L Johnson, Kim K Birtcher, Omar Serna, Susan Abughosh
{"title":"新药 2 型糖尿病患者的实际治疗模式:初始联合疗法与序贯阶梯疗法。","authors":"Zahra Majd, Hua Chen, Michael L Johnson, Kim K Birtcher, Omar Serna, Susan Abughosh","doi":"10.1016/j.japh.2024.102295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite evidence-based guidelines and available therapies, many patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have suboptimal glycemic control. The current standard of care suggests initial monotherapy followed by add-on therapy to achieve and maintain target HbA1c. However, clinical trials revealed that intensive glycemic control, especially at the early stages of the disease, could result in earlier and better long-term glycemic control in addition to reducing diabetes-related complications and mortality risk.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This population-based study aimed to investigate treatment initiation patterns among newly diagnosed drug-naïve patients with T2D in real-world clinical settings, focusing on two recommended approaches: initial combination therapy and step-therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted using claims data from the Merative MarketScan Research Databases between 2017 and 2019. The study included drug-naïve patients with T2D with continuous enrollment in medical and pharmacy plans. Patients were categorized into the initial combination therapy or step-therapy cohorts based on their initial treatment regimen. Baseline characteristics of the cohorts were recorded, and logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with receiving each approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included a total of 117,419 patients in the Commercial/Medicare population and 18,574 patients in the Medicaid population. About 10% to 12% of patients received initial combination therapy as their initial pharmacotherapy regimen. Several patient demographic and clinical characteristics were significantly associated with the use of initial combination therapy vs. step-therapy. Results also showed a greater usage of loose-dose combination pills over fixed-dose combinations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given the lack of real-world studies on combination vs. step-therapy, the study findings provide insights into the current treatment initiation patterns and associated factors among drug-naïve patients with T2D. These findings contribute to understanding the real-world clinical practices in diabetes management and may help guide clinicians in making informed decisions regarding pharmacotherapy approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":50015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","volume":" ","pages":"102295"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world treatment patterns in drug naïve type 2 diabetes population: Initial combination therapy vs. sequential step-therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Zahra Majd, Hua Chen, Michael L Johnson, Kim K Birtcher, Omar Serna, Susan Abughosh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.japh.2024.102295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite evidence-based guidelines and available therapies, many patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have suboptimal glycemic control. The current standard of care suggests initial monotherapy followed by add-on therapy to achieve and maintain target HbA1c. However, clinical trials revealed that intensive glycemic control, especially at the early stages of the disease, could result in earlier and better long-term glycemic control in addition to reducing diabetes-related complications and mortality risk.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This population-based study aimed to investigate treatment initiation patterns among newly diagnosed drug-naïve patients with T2D in real-world clinical settings, focusing on two recommended approaches: initial combination therapy and step-therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted using claims data from the Merative MarketScan Research Databases between 2017 and 2019. The study included drug-naïve patients with T2D with continuous enrollment in medical and pharmacy plans. Patients were categorized into the initial combination therapy or step-therapy cohorts based on their initial treatment regimen. Baseline characteristics of the cohorts were recorded, and logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with receiving each approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included a total of 117,419 patients in the Commercial/Medicare population and 18,574 patients in the Medicaid population. About 10% to 12% of patients received initial combination therapy as their initial pharmacotherapy regimen. Several patient demographic and clinical characteristics were significantly associated with the use of initial combination therapy vs. step-therapy. Results also showed a greater usage of loose-dose combination pills over fixed-dose combinations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given the lack of real-world studies on combination vs. step-therapy, the study findings provide insights into the current treatment initiation patterns and associated factors among drug-naïve patients with T2D. These findings contribute to understanding the real-world clinical practices in diabetes management and may help guide clinicians in making informed decisions regarding pharmacotherapy approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"102295\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japh.2024.102295\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japh.2024.102295","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管有循证指南和可用疗法,但许多 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者的血糖控制仍不理想。目前的治疗标准建议在初始单药治疗后采用附加疗法,以达到并维持目标 HbA1c。然而,临床试验显示,强化血糖控制,尤其是在疾病的早期阶段,除了能降低糖尿病相关并发症和死亡风险外,还能更早和更好地长期控制血糖:这项基于人群的研究旨在调查现实世界临床环境中新确诊的药物治疗无效的 T2D 患者的治疗启动模式,重点关注两种推荐方法:初始联合疗法和阶梯疗法:利用 Merative™ MarketScan® 研究数据库中 2017 年至 2019 年期间的理赔数据进行了一项回顾性研究。研究对象包括连续加入医疗和药房计划的 T2D 患者。根据患者的初始治疗方案,将其分为初始联合治疗队列或阶梯治疗队列。研究记录了组群的基线特征,并进行了逻辑回归分析,以确定与接受每种方法相关的因素:研究共纳入了 117,419 名商业/医疗保险人群患者和 18,574 名医疗补助人群患者。约有 10-12% 的患者接受了初始联合疗法作为其初始药物治疗方案。一些患者的人口统计学特征和临床特征与使用初始联合疗法和阶梯疗法有显著相关性。结果还显示,松散剂量联合用药的使用率高于固定剂量联合用药:鉴于缺乏关于联合疗法与分步疗法的真实世界研究,本研究结果提供了对目前药物治疗无效的 T2D 患者的治疗启动模式及相关因素的深入了解。这些发现有助于了解糖尿病管理的实际临床实践,并有助于指导临床医生就药物治疗方法做出明智的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Real-world treatment patterns in drug naïve type 2 diabetes population: Initial combination therapy vs. sequential step-therapy.

Background: Despite evidence-based guidelines and available therapies, many patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have suboptimal glycemic control. The current standard of care suggests initial monotherapy followed by add-on therapy to achieve and maintain target HbA1c. However, clinical trials revealed that intensive glycemic control, especially at the early stages of the disease, could result in earlier and better long-term glycemic control in addition to reducing diabetes-related complications and mortality risk.

Objective: This population-based study aimed to investigate treatment initiation patterns among newly diagnosed drug-naïve patients with T2D in real-world clinical settings, focusing on two recommended approaches: initial combination therapy and step-therapy.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using claims data from the Merative MarketScan Research Databases between 2017 and 2019. The study included drug-naïve patients with T2D with continuous enrollment in medical and pharmacy plans. Patients were categorized into the initial combination therapy or step-therapy cohorts based on their initial treatment regimen. Baseline characteristics of the cohorts were recorded, and logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with receiving each approach.

Results: The study included a total of 117,419 patients in the Commercial/Medicare population and 18,574 patients in the Medicaid population. About 10% to 12% of patients received initial combination therapy as their initial pharmacotherapy regimen. Several patient demographic and clinical characteristics were significantly associated with the use of initial combination therapy vs. step-therapy. Results also showed a greater usage of loose-dose combination pills over fixed-dose combinations.

Conclusion: Given the lack of real-world studies on combination vs. step-therapy, the study findings provide insights into the current treatment initiation patterns and associated factors among drug-naïve patients with T2D. These findings contribute to understanding the real-world clinical practices in diabetes management and may help guide clinicians in making informed decisions regarding pharmacotherapy approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
336
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Pharmacists Association is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Pharmacists Association (APhA), providing information on pharmaceutical care, drug therapy, diseases and other health issues, trends in pharmacy practice and therapeutics, informed opinion, and original research. JAPhA publishes original research, reviews, experiences, and opinion articles that link science to contemporary pharmacy practice to improve patient care.
期刊最新文献
Implementing a Telemedicine-led Heart Failure Medication Regimen Optimization Clinic in Medically Underserved Heart Failure Populations. Exploring the pharmacist role in insomnia management and care provision: A scoping review. Long-Term Opioid Therapy in Older Adults: Incidence and Risk Factors Related to Patient Characteristics and Initial Opioid Dispensed. Pharmacists Enhance National Security through Medical Countermeasure Program Leadership. Barriers to and Facilitators of Buprenorphine Dispensing for Opioid Use Disorder: Evidence from Focus Groups in Appalachian Kentucky.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1