2008-2019 年美国各州实行带薪病假与成年人心血管疾病死亡率。

IF 2.3 3区医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Public Health Policy Pub Date : 2024-11-09 DOI:10.1057/s41271-024-00531-z

Samuel L Swift, Lexi O'Donnell, Brady Horn, Katrina Kezios, Tali Elfassy, Julie Reagan, Adina Zeki Al Hazzouri, Tracie Collins

{"title":"2008-2019 年美国各州实行带薪病假与成年人心血管疾病死亡率。","authors":"Samuel L Swift, Lexi O'Donnell, Brady Horn, Katrina Kezios, Tali Elfassy, Julie Reagan, Adina Zeki Al Hazzouri, Tracie Collins","doi":"10.1057/s41271-024-00531-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the leading cause of death in the United States and may be prevented through improved working conditions. The United States does not guarantee paid sick leave (PSL) at the federal level. We used quasi-experimental event study methods to examine the relationship between state-level PSL policies and county-level CVD mortality among working-age adults aged 15 to 64 over time (2008 to 2019). We examined the annual CVD mortality rates in 1054 counties from all 50 states and Washington D.C.. In the Northeastern region of the United States, there were drops in the CVD mortality rate in all years after PSL was adopted. We found no effect of PSL in the Western United States with a strong presence of pretreatment effects, making the results for that region uninterpretable. Our results support the use of state-level PSL policies to reduce county-level CVD mortality rates in the Northeastern United States.","PeriodicalId":50070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"State adoption of paid sick leave and cardiovascular disease mortality among adults in the United States, 2008-2019.\",\"authors\":\"Samuel L Swift, Lexi O'Donnell, Brady Horn, Katrina Kezios, Tali Elfassy, Julie Reagan, Adina Zeki Al Hazzouri, Tracie Collins\",\"doi\":\"10.1057/s41271-024-00531-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the leading cause of death in the United States and may be prevented through improved working conditions. The United States does not guarantee paid sick leave (PSL) at the federal level. We used quasi-experimental event study methods to examine the relationship between state-level PSL policies and county-level CVD mortality among working-age adults aged 15 to 64 over time (2008 to 2019). We examined the annual CVD mortality rates in 1054 counties from all 50 states and Washington D.C.. In the Northeastern region of the United States, there were drops in the CVD mortality rate in all years after PSL was adopted. We found no effect of PSL in the Western United States with a strong presence of pretreatment effects, making the results for that region uninterpretable. Our results support the use of state-level PSL policies to reduce county-level CVD mortality rates in the Northeastern United States.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Health Policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Health Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-024-00531-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-024-00531-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

心血管疾病（CVD）是美国人的主要死因，可以通过改善工作条件来预防。美国联邦政府并不保障带薪病假（PSL）。我们采用准实验事件研究方法，考察了州一级带薪病假政策与县一级 15 至 64 岁工作年龄成年人心血管疾病死亡率之间的关系（2008 年至 2019 年）。我们研究了美国 50 个州和华盛顿特区 1054 个县的心血管疾病年死亡率。在美国东北部地区，采用 PSL 后，心血管疾病死亡率在所有年份都有所下降。在美国西部地区，我们发现 PSL 没有产生任何影响，而该地区在采用 PSL 之前存在强烈的预处理效应，因此无法解释该地区的结果。我们的研究结果支持使用州一级的 PSL 政策来降低美国东北部县一级的心血管疾病死亡率。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

State adoption of paid sick leave and cardiovascular disease mortality among adults in the United States, 2008-2019.

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the leading cause of death in the United States and may be prevented through improved working conditions. The United States does not guarantee paid sick leave (PSL) at the federal level. We used quasi-experimental event study methods to examine the relationship between state-level PSL policies and county-level CVD mortality among working-age adults aged 15 to 64 over time (2008 to 2019). We examined the annual CVD mortality rates in 1054 counties from all 50 states and Washington D.C.. In the Northeastern region of the United States, there were drops in the CVD mortality rate in all years after PSL was adopted. We found no effect of PSL in the Western United States with a strong presence of pretreatment effects, making the results for that region uninterpretable. Our results support the use of state-level PSL policies to reduce county-level CVD mortality rates in the Northeastern United States.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Public Health Policy 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生

CiteScore

5.70

自引率

2.60%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of Public Health Policy (JPHP) will continue its 35 year tradition: an accessible source of scholarly articles on the epidemiologic and social foundations of public health policy, rigorously edited, and progressive. JPHP aims to create a more inclusive public health policy dialogue, within nations and among them. It broadens public health policy debates beyond the ''health system'' to examine all forces and environments that impinge on the health of populations. It provides an exciting platform for airing controversy and framing policy debates - honing policies to solve new problems and unresolved old ones. JPHP welcomes unsolicited original scientific and policy contributions on all public health topics. New authors are particularly encouraged to enter debates about how to improve the health of populations and reduce health disparities.