{"title":"了解沙特阿拉伯公众对肺癌筛查和风险因素的认识、态度和做法:横断面研究。","authors":"Sadin Ayman Alamri, Manal Mutlaq Alzahrani, Aseel Ayman Alamri, Waad Waleed Khalifa, Ruba Yosof Alsulami, Jameel Bardesi, Wed Salah, Abeer F Zakariyah","doi":"10.4103/atm.atm_111_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Early detection of lung cancer through screening can improve outcomes; yet public knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding lung cancer screening in Saudi Arabia are limited.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim is to assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward lung cancer risk factors and screening, and understand the impact of demographic factors on these variables.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>An observational cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2023 to March 2024, involving 708 participants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A validated questionnaire from a previous Malaysian study, translated into Arabic, was distributed to participants.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>Descriptive statistics, Shapiro-Wilk test, one-way analysis of variance, Tukey's test, and logistic regression were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants (95.9%) recognized smoking as a major risk factor. Common misconceptions included viewing lung cancer as infectious (84.0%) or affecting only men (14.4%). Nonetheless, 66.4% expressed willingness for future screening. Younger participants (18-40 years) and those with higher education demonstrated better knowledge scores (mean score: 11.33 ± 2.97 for ages 18-40; 11.42 ± 2.88 for those with master's or doctorate degrees), with significant differences based on age (<i>P</i> = 0.007) and education level (<i>P</i> = 0.025). No significant differences were observed based on gender, region of residence, or monthly family income.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a positive inclination toward lung cancer screening among the Saudi public, but there are significant knowledge gaps, particularly regarding nonsmoking-related risk factors and misconceptions, suggesting a need for enhanced public education and screening programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50760,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Medicine","volume":"19 4","pages":"275-283"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559701/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the public knowledge, attitude, and practice toward screening and risk factors of lung cancer in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Sadin Ayman Alamri, Manal Mutlaq Alzahrani, Aseel Ayman Alamri, Waad Waleed Khalifa, Ruba Yosof Alsulami, Jameel Bardesi, Wed Salah, Abeer F Zakariyah\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/atm.atm_111_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Early detection of lung cancer through screening can improve outcomes; yet public knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding lung cancer screening in Saudi Arabia are limited.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim is to assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward lung cancer risk factors and screening, and understand the impact of demographic factors on these variables.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>An observational cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2023 to March 2024, involving 708 participants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A validated questionnaire from a previous Malaysian study, translated into Arabic, was distributed to participants.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>Descriptive statistics, Shapiro-Wilk test, one-way analysis of variance, Tukey's test, and logistic regression were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants (95.9%) recognized smoking as a major risk factor. Common misconceptions included viewing lung cancer as infectious (84.0%) or affecting only men (14.4%). Nonetheless, 66.4% expressed willingness for future screening. Younger participants (18-40 years) and those with higher education demonstrated better knowledge scores (mean score: 11.33 ± 2.97 for ages 18-40; 11.42 ± 2.88 for those with master's or doctorate degrees), with significant differences based on age (<i>P</i> = 0.007) and education level (<i>P</i> = 0.025). No significant differences were observed based on gender, region of residence, or monthly family income.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a positive inclination toward lung cancer screening among the Saudi public, but there are significant knowledge gaps, particularly regarding nonsmoking-related risk factors and misconceptions, suggesting a need for enhanced public education and screening programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Thoracic Medicine\",\"volume\":\"19 4\",\"pages\":\"275-283\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559701/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Thoracic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/atm.atm_111_24\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Thoracic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/atm.atm_111_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Understanding the public knowledge, attitude, and practice toward screening and risk factors of lung cancer in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study.
Context: Early detection of lung cancer through screening can improve outcomes; yet public knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding lung cancer screening in Saudi Arabia are limited.
Aims: The aim is to assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward lung cancer risk factors and screening, and understand the impact of demographic factors on these variables.
Settings and design: An observational cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2023 to March 2024, involving 708 participants.
Methods: A validated questionnaire from a previous Malaysian study, translated into Arabic, was distributed to participants.
Statistical analysis used: Descriptive statistics, Shapiro-Wilk test, one-way analysis of variance, Tukey's test, and logistic regression were used.
Results: Most participants (95.9%) recognized smoking as a major risk factor. Common misconceptions included viewing lung cancer as infectious (84.0%) or affecting only men (14.4%). Nonetheless, 66.4% expressed willingness for future screening. Younger participants (18-40 years) and those with higher education demonstrated better knowledge scores (mean score: 11.33 ± 2.97 for ages 18-40; 11.42 ± 2.88 for those with master's or doctorate degrees), with significant differences based on age (P = 0.007) and education level (P = 0.025). No significant differences were observed based on gender, region of residence, or monthly family income.
Conclusions: There is a positive inclination toward lung cancer screening among the Saudi public, but there are significant knowledge gaps, particularly regarding nonsmoking-related risk factors and misconceptions, suggesting a need for enhanced public education and screening programs.
期刊介绍:
The journal will cover studies related to multidisciplinary specialties of chest medicine, such as adult and pediatrics pulmonology, thoracic surgery, critical care medicine, respiratory care, transplantation, sleep medicine, related basic medical sciences, and more. The journal also features basic science, special reports, case reports, board review , and more. Editorials and communications to the editor that explore controversial issues and encourage further discussion by physicians dealing with chest medicine.