使用 Ir-192 放射源对宫颈癌患者进行高剂量率近距离治疗的肿瘤控制和正常组织并发症

IF 0.7 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Medical Physics Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-21 DOI:10.4103/jmp.jmp_86_24
Gurpreet Kaur, Pardeep Garg, Vinod Kumar Dangwal, Baltej Singh, Garima Gaur, Romikant Grover, Simrandeep Singh, Rachana Sharma
{"title":"使用 Ir-192 放射源对宫颈癌患者进行高剂量率近距离治疗的肿瘤控制和正常组织并发症","authors":"Gurpreet Kaur, Pardeep Garg, Vinod Kumar Dangwal, Baltej Singh, Garima Gaur, Romikant Grover, Simrandeep Singh, Rachana Sharma","doi":"10.4103/jmp.jmp_86_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of the study was to calculate, tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) in cervical cancer patients and to clinically correlate the outcomes with a follow-up period of 24 months.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>One hundred and fifty patients were included in the present study who received 46 Gy/23 fractions/4½ weeks of external beam radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy, followed by intracavitary brachytherapy of 3 different fractionations regimens, i.e., 9.5 Gy per fraction of two fractions (50 patients in Arm1), 7.5 Gy per fraction of three fractions (50 patients in Arm2), and 6.0 Gy per fraction of four fractions (50 patients in Arm3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median TCP value for Arm1, Arm2, and Arm3 was 99.6%, 94%, and 98.1%, respectively, (<i>P</i> < 0.01). The median NTC<i>P</i> value for bladder in Arm1, Arm2, and Arm3 was 0.17%, 0.04%, and 0.07%, respectively, (<i>P</i> = 0.05). The median NTC<i>P</i> value for rectum in Arm1, Arm2, and Arm3 was 4.73%, 4.35%, and 3.17%, respectively, (<i>P</i> = 0.052). The overall survival (OS) of 90%, 86%, and 84% was found for Arm1, Arm2, and Arm3, respectively, at 24 months of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TCP, NTCP, and OS rates were found higher in Arm1 as compared to the other two arms. The complications found in all arms were less, low grade, and manageable. Hence, Arm1, i.e., 9.5 Gy per fraction of two fractions can be concluded as the optimum fractionation regime in terms of radiobiological parameters as well as overall patient comfort.</p>","PeriodicalId":51719,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"49 3","pages":"363-369"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11548083/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tumor Control and Normal Tissue Complications in High-dose-rate Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer Patients Using Ir-192 Radioactive Source.\",\"authors\":\"Gurpreet Kaur, Pardeep Garg, Vinod Kumar Dangwal, Baltej Singh, Garima Gaur, Romikant Grover, Simrandeep Singh, Rachana Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jmp.jmp_86_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of the study was to calculate, tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) in cervical cancer patients and to clinically correlate the outcomes with a follow-up period of 24 months.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>One hundred and fifty patients were included in the present study who received 46 Gy/23 fractions/4½ weeks of external beam radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy, followed by intracavitary brachytherapy of 3 different fractionations regimens, i.e., 9.5 Gy per fraction of two fractions (50 patients in Arm1), 7.5 Gy per fraction of three fractions (50 patients in Arm2), and 6.0 Gy per fraction of four fractions (50 patients in Arm3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median TCP value for Arm1, Arm2, and Arm3 was 99.6%, 94%, and 98.1%, respectively, (<i>P</i> < 0.01). The median NTC<i>P</i> value for bladder in Arm1, Arm2, and Arm3 was 0.17%, 0.04%, and 0.07%, respectively, (<i>P</i> = 0.05). The median NTC<i>P</i> value for rectum in Arm1, Arm2, and Arm3 was 4.73%, 4.35%, and 3.17%, respectively, (<i>P</i> = 0.052). The overall survival (OS) of 90%, 86%, and 84% was found for Arm1, Arm2, and Arm3, respectively, at 24 months of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TCP, NTCP, and OS rates were found higher in Arm1 as compared to the other two arms. The complications found in all arms were less, low grade, and manageable. Hence, Arm1, i.e., 9.5 Gy per fraction of two fractions can be concluded as the optimum fractionation regime in terms of radiobiological parameters as well as overall patient comfort.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"49 3\",\"pages\":\"363-369\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11548083/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_86_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_86_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介该研究的目的是计算宫颈癌患者的肿瘤控制概率(TCP)和正常组织并发症概率(NTCP),并对随访24个月的结果进行临床相关分析:150名患者接受了46 Gy/23次/4周半的体外射束放疗和顺铂化疗,随后接受了3种不同分次方案的腔内近距离放射治疗,即2次分次每次9.5 Gy(50名患者,Arm1)、3次分次每次7.5 Gy(50名患者,Arm2)和4次分次每次6.0 Gy(50名患者,Arm3):Arm1、Arm2 和 Arm3 的中位 TCP 值分别为 99.6%、94% 和 98.1%(P < 0.01)。Arm1、Arm2 和 Arm3 膀胱的 NTCP 中位值分别为 0.17%、0.04% 和 0.07%(P = 0.05)。Arm1、Arm2和Arm3的直肠NTCP中位值分别为4.73%、4.35%和3.17%(P = 0.052)。随访 24 个月后,Arm1、Arm2 和 Arm3 的总生存率(OS)分别为 90%、86% 和 84%:结论:与其他两个治疗组相比,治疗组1的TCP、NTCP和OS率更高。所有治疗组的并发症均较少、程度较低且可控。因此,从放射生物学参数和患者整体舒适度的角度来看,Arm1(即每分两次,每次 9.5 Gy)是最佳的分次治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tumor Control and Normal Tissue Complications in High-dose-rate Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer Patients Using Ir-192 Radioactive Source.

Introduction: The purpose of the study was to calculate, tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) in cervical cancer patients and to clinically correlate the outcomes with a follow-up period of 24 months.

Materials and methods: One hundred and fifty patients were included in the present study who received 46 Gy/23 fractions/4½ weeks of external beam radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy, followed by intracavitary brachytherapy of 3 different fractionations regimens, i.e., 9.5 Gy per fraction of two fractions (50 patients in Arm1), 7.5 Gy per fraction of three fractions (50 patients in Arm2), and 6.0 Gy per fraction of four fractions (50 patients in Arm3).

Results: The median TCP value for Arm1, Arm2, and Arm3 was 99.6%, 94%, and 98.1%, respectively, (P < 0.01). The median NTCP value for bladder in Arm1, Arm2, and Arm3 was 0.17%, 0.04%, and 0.07%, respectively, (P = 0.05). The median NTCP value for rectum in Arm1, Arm2, and Arm3 was 4.73%, 4.35%, and 3.17%, respectively, (P = 0.052). The overall survival (OS) of 90%, 86%, and 84% was found for Arm1, Arm2, and Arm3, respectively, at 24 months of follow-up.

Conclusion: TCP, NTCP, and OS rates were found higher in Arm1 as compared to the other two arms. The complications found in all arms were less, low grade, and manageable. Hence, Arm1, i.e., 9.5 Gy per fraction of two fractions can be concluded as the optimum fractionation regime in terms of radiobiological parameters as well as overall patient comfort.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Physics
Journal of Medical Physics RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
55
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS is the official journal of Association of Medical Physicists of India (AMPI). The association has been bringing out a quarterly publication since 1976. Till the end of 1993, it was known as Medical Physics Bulletin, which then became Journal of Medical Physics. The main objective of the Journal is to serve as a vehicle of communication to highlight all aspects of the practice of medical radiation physics. The areas covered include all aspects of the application of radiation physics to biological sciences, radiotherapy, radiodiagnosis, nuclear medicine, dosimetry and radiation protection. Papers / manuscripts dealing with the aspects of physics related to cancer therapy / radiobiology also fall within the scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
A Segmentation-based Automated Calculation of Patient Size and Size-specific Dose Estimates in Pediatric Computed Tomography Scans. A Study on Radiation Level at the Treatment Plane Due to Induced Activity in Linear Accelerator Head. Advancements and Applications of Three-dimensional Printing Technology in Surgery. Agar-based Phantom for Evaluating Targeting of High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Systems for Breast Ablation. An Analysis of Radiotherapy Machine Requirements in India: Impact of the Pandemic and Regional Disparities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1