加速度计在亚急性中风幸存者自我指导的上肢活动计划中的可行性。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Brain Impairment Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1071/IB24008
Tamara Tse, Yvonne Y K Mak-Yuen, Wesley Young, Susan Darzins
{"title":"加速度计在亚急性中风幸存者自我指导的上肢活动计划中的可行性。","authors":"Tamara Tse, Yvonne Y K Mak-Yuen, Wesley Young, Susan Darzins","doi":"10.1071/IB24008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Wearable devices, such as accelerometers, offer novel approaches to measuring post-stroke upper limb activity. Limited studies have explored feasibility of accelerometry. Guided by the Bowen Feasibility Framework, this feasibility study aimed to examine the practicality, acceptability, and limited efficacy of accelerometry in a self-directed upper limb program with stroke survivors using a pre-post study of sequentially eligible inpatients. Method Key metrics were: practicality (60% of participants had 10hours of wear per day for 3 or more days), acceptability (adherence to recommended wear-time), and limited efficacy (correlation between Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) and upper limb use from accelerometry data). Results Twelve stroke survivors were recruited over 7 months, mean age 73years (range 39-94years). Eight participants (67%) met the practicality and acceptability criteria. A moderate positive correlation existed between WMFT and upper limb use at admission (r s =0.33, P =0.42) and at discharge (r s =0.42, P =0.34). Conclusion Wearable devices were feasible and acceptable for most stroke survivors, however, one-third found the devices uncomfortable, and this should be factored into sample size calculations of future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":56329,"journal":{"name":"Brain Impairment","volume":"25 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of accelerometry in a self-directed upper limb activity program of a subacute setting with stroke survivors.\",\"authors\":\"Tamara Tse, Yvonne Y K Mak-Yuen, Wesley Young, Susan Darzins\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/IB24008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background Wearable devices, such as accelerometers, offer novel approaches to measuring post-stroke upper limb activity. Limited studies have explored feasibility of accelerometry. Guided by the Bowen Feasibility Framework, this feasibility study aimed to examine the practicality, acceptability, and limited efficacy of accelerometry in a self-directed upper limb program with stroke survivors using a pre-post study of sequentially eligible inpatients. Method Key metrics were: practicality (60% of participants had 10hours of wear per day for 3 or more days), acceptability (adherence to recommended wear-time), and limited efficacy (correlation between Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) and upper limb use from accelerometry data). Results Twelve stroke survivors were recruited over 7 months, mean age 73years (range 39-94years). Eight participants (67%) met the practicality and acceptability criteria. A moderate positive correlation existed between WMFT and upper limb use at admission (r s =0.33, P =0.42) and at discharge (r s =0.42, P =0.34). Conclusion Wearable devices were feasible and acceptable for most stroke survivors, however, one-third found the devices uncomfortable, and this should be factored into sample size calculations of future studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain Impairment\",\"volume\":\"25 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain Impairment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/IB24008\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Impairment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/IB24008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 加速计等可穿戴设备为测量卒中后上肢活动提供了新方法。有关加速度计可行性的研究十分有限。在鲍温可行性框架的指导下,本可行性研究旨在通过对符合条件的住院病人进行前-后研究,考察加速度计在中风幸存者自我指导的上肢计划中的实用性、可接受性和有限的有效性。方法 主要指标包括:实用性(60% 的参与者每天佩戴 10 小时,持续 3 天或更多天)、可接受性(坚持建议的佩戴时间)和有限功效(沃尔夫运动功能测试 (WMFT) 与加速度计数据中上肢使用情况之间的相关性)。结果 招募了 12 名中风幸存者,历时 7 个月,平均年龄 73 岁(39-94 岁不等)。八名参与者(67%)符合实用性和可接受性标准。WMFT 与入院时(r s =0.33,P =0.42)和出院时(r s =0.42,P =0.34)的上肢使用情况呈中度正相关。结论 对大多数中风幸存者来说,可穿戴设备是可行且可接受的,但有三分之一的幸存者认为设备不舒适,这一点应在未来研究的样本量计算中予以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Feasibility of accelerometry in a self-directed upper limb activity program of a subacute setting with stroke survivors.

Background Wearable devices, such as accelerometers, offer novel approaches to measuring post-stroke upper limb activity. Limited studies have explored feasibility of accelerometry. Guided by the Bowen Feasibility Framework, this feasibility study aimed to examine the practicality, acceptability, and limited efficacy of accelerometry in a self-directed upper limb program with stroke survivors using a pre-post study of sequentially eligible inpatients. Method Key metrics were: practicality (60% of participants had 10hours of wear per day for 3 or more days), acceptability (adherence to recommended wear-time), and limited efficacy (correlation between Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) and upper limb use from accelerometry data). Results Twelve stroke survivors were recruited over 7 months, mean age 73years (range 39-94years). Eight participants (67%) met the practicality and acceptability criteria. A moderate positive correlation existed between WMFT and upper limb use at admission (r s =0.33, P =0.42) and at discharge (r s =0.42, P =0.34). Conclusion Wearable devices were feasible and acceptable for most stroke survivors, however, one-third found the devices uncomfortable, and this should be factored into sample size calculations of future studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain Impairment
Brain Impairment CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal addresses topics related to the aetiology, epidemiology, treatment and outcomes of brain impairment with a particular focus on the implications for functional status, participation, rehabilitation and quality of life. Disciplines reflect a broad multidisciplinary scope and include neuroscience, neurology, neuropsychology, psychiatry, clinical psychology, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, speech pathology, social work, and nursing. Submissions are welcome across the full range of conditions that affect brain function (stroke, tumour, progressive neurological illnesses, dementia, traumatic brain injury, epilepsy, etc.) throughout the lifespan.
期刊最新文献
Feasibility of accelerometry in a self-directed upper limb activity program of a subacute setting with stroke survivors. Health literacy after traumatic brain injury: characterisation and control comparison. Perceptions and experiences of health professionals when supporting adults with stroke to engage in physical activity. Editorial: Clinical implementation to optimise outcomes for people with brain conditions. The development of a cognitive screening protocol for Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander peoples: the Guddi Way screen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1