Eunseon Gwak , Seung-Ah Choe , Erdenetuya Bolormaa , Young June Choe , Chengbin Wang , Jonathan Fix , Muruga Vadivale , Matthew D. Rousculp
{"title":"韩国同源 NVX-CoV2373 和 BNT162b2 COVID-19 疫苗接种的相对效果。","authors":"Eunseon Gwak , Seung-Ah Choe , Erdenetuya Bolormaa , Young June Choe , Chengbin Wang , Jonathan Fix , Muruga Vadivale , Matthew D. Rousculp","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To estimate the relative effectiveness of NVX-CoV2373 versus BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech) in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 disease during the Omicron variant dominance in South Korea, we conducted a retrospective cohort-study among ≥12-year-olds using the K-COV-N database, which links COVID-19 vaccine registry data with health insurance claims data. The Cox proportional-hazards model and inverse probability of treatment weighting were employed to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs). Among homologous primary-series NVX-CoV2373 versus BNT162b2 recipients at Day 180 post-vaccination, the aHR was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87–0.93) for all laboratory-confirmed and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.48–0.88) for severe infections. Among homologous 1st-booster recipients, it was 1.15 (95% CI: 1.01–1.30) for all laboratory-confirmed and 0.39 (95% CI: 0.20–0.75) for severe infections. At 180-days post-immunization, we observed homologous, NVX-CoV2373 primary-series added and 1st booster offered comparable protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection versus BNT162b2.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 126503"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relative effectiveness of homologous NVX-CoV2373 and BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccinations in South Korea\",\"authors\":\"Eunseon Gwak , Seung-Ah Choe , Erdenetuya Bolormaa , Young June Choe , Chengbin Wang , Jonathan Fix , Muruga Vadivale , Matthew D. Rousculp\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126503\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>To estimate the relative effectiveness of NVX-CoV2373 versus BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech) in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 disease during the Omicron variant dominance in South Korea, we conducted a retrospective cohort-study among ≥12-year-olds using the K-COV-N database, which links COVID-19 vaccine registry data with health insurance claims data. The Cox proportional-hazards model and inverse probability of treatment weighting were employed to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs). Among homologous primary-series NVX-CoV2373 versus BNT162b2 recipients at Day 180 post-vaccination, the aHR was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87–0.93) for all laboratory-confirmed and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.48–0.88) for severe infections. Among homologous 1st-booster recipients, it was 1.15 (95% CI: 1.01–1.30) for all laboratory-confirmed and 0.39 (95% CI: 0.20–0.75) for severe infections. At 180-days post-immunization, we observed homologous, NVX-CoV2373 primary-series added and 1st booster offered comparable protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection versus BNT162b2.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vaccine\",\"volume\":\"43 \",\"pages\":\"Article 126503\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vaccine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X2401185X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X2401185X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Relative effectiveness of homologous NVX-CoV2373 and BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccinations in South Korea
To estimate the relative effectiveness of NVX-CoV2373 versus BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech) in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 disease during the Omicron variant dominance in South Korea, we conducted a retrospective cohort-study among ≥12-year-olds using the K-COV-N database, which links COVID-19 vaccine registry data with health insurance claims data. The Cox proportional-hazards model and inverse probability of treatment weighting were employed to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs). Among homologous primary-series NVX-CoV2373 versus BNT162b2 recipients at Day 180 post-vaccination, the aHR was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87–0.93) for all laboratory-confirmed and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.48–0.88) for severe infections. Among homologous 1st-booster recipients, it was 1.15 (95% CI: 1.01–1.30) for all laboratory-confirmed and 0.39 (95% CI: 0.20–0.75) for severe infections. At 180-days post-immunization, we observed homologous, NVX-CoV2373 primary-series added and 1st booster offered comparable protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection versus BNT162b2.
期刊介绍:
Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.