{"title":"临床重要结果值(阈值)与所研究的患者群体有关。","authors":"Tyler N Sharp, Justin J Greiner","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.10.047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) measures are critical to understand the influence and benefits of orthopedic surgery. While clinically important outcome values (CIOVs) have been developed to allow clinical interpretation of PRO values, gaps in outcome metrics still remain. The CIOVs can be utilized to describe specific populations of interest, such as in patients with hip dysplasia undergoing combined hip arthroscopy and periacetabular osteotomy. With differing populations, however, the presence and/or absence of modifying factors limits cross-comparison of CIOVs. Utilizing a different perspective, such as the use of simple questions that are important for both the patient and the surgeon, can provide important information that helps fill in the gaps left from traditional PROs.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinically Important Outcome Values (Thresholds) are Specific to the Patient Population Studied.\",\"authors\":\"Tyler N Sharp, Justin J Greiner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.10.047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) measures are critical to understand the influence and benefits of orthopedic surgery. While clinically important outcome values (CIOVs) have been developed to allow clinical interpretation of PRO values, gaps in outcome metrics still remain. The CIOVs can be utilized to describe specific populations of interest, such as in patients with hip dysplasia undergoing combined hip arthroscopy and periacetabular osteotomy. With differing populations, however, the presence and/or absence of modifying factors limits cross-comparison of CIOVs. Utilizing a different perspective, such as the use of simple questions that are important for both the patient and the surgeon, can provide important information that helps fill in the gaps left from traditional PROs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.10.047\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.10.047","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinically Important Outcome Values (Thresholds) are Specific to the Patient Population Studied.
Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) measures are critical to understand the influence and benefits of orthopedic surgery. While clinically important outcome values (CIOVs) have been developed to allow clinical interpretation of PRO values, gaps in outcome metrics still remain. The CIOVs can be utilized to describe specific populations of interest, such as in patients with hip dysplasia undergoing combined hip arthroscopy and periacetabular osteotomy. With differing populations, however, the presence and/or absence of modifying factors limits cross-comparison of CIOVs. Utilizing a different perspective, such as the use of simple questions that are important for both the patient and the surgeon, can provide important information that helps fill in the gaps left from traditional PROs.
期刊介绍:
Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.