临床重要结果值(阈值)与所研究的患者群体有关。

Tyler N Sharp, Justin J Greiner
{"title":"临床重要结果值(阈值)与所研究的患者群体有关。","authors":"Tyler N Sharp, Justin J Greiner","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.10.047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) measures are critical to understand the influence and benefits of orthopedic surgery. While clinically important outcome values (CIOVs) have been developed to allow clinical interpretation of PRO values, gaps in outcome metrics still remain. The CIOVs can be utilized to describe specific populations of interest, such as in patients with hip dysplasia undergoing combined hip arthroscopy and periacetabular osteotomy. With differing populations, however, the presence and/or absence of modifying factors limits cross-comparison of CIOVs. Utilizing a different perspective, such as the use of simple questions that are important for both the patient and the surgeon, can provide important information that helps fill in the gaps left from traditional PROs.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinically Important Outcome Values (Thresholds) are Specific to the Patient Population Studied.\",\"authors\":\"Tyler N Sharp, Justin J Greiner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.10.047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) measures are critical to understand the influence and benefits of orthopedic surgery. While clinically important outcome values (CIOVs) have been developed to allow clinical interpretation of PRO values, gaps in outcome metrics still remain. The CIOVs can be utilized to describe specific populations of interest, such as in patients with hip dysplasia undergoing combined hip arthroscopy and periacetabular osteotomy. With differing populations, however, the presence and/or absence of modifying factors limits cross-comparison of CIOVs. Utilizing a different perspective, such as the use of simple questions that are important for both the patient and the surgeon, can provide important information that helps fill in the gaps left from traditional PROs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.10.047\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.10.047","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

患者报告结果(PRO)指标对于了解骨科手术的影响和益处至关重要。虽然临床重要结果值(CIOVs)已经开发出来,可以对患者报告结果值进行临床解释,但结果指标方面的差距仍然存在。CIOVs可用于描述特定的相关人群,如接受髋关节镜和髋臼周围截骨术的髋关节发育不良患者。然而,对于不同的人群,由于存在和/或不存在调节因素,CIOVs 的交叉比较受到限制。利用不同的视角,例如使用对患者和外科医生都很重要的简单问题,可以提供重要的信息,帮助填补传统PROs留下的空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinically Important Outcome Values (Thresholds) are Specific to the Patient Population Studied.

Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) measures are critical to understand the influence and benefits of orthopedic surgery. While clinically important outcome values (CIOVs) have been developed to allow clinical interpretation of PRO values, gaps in outcome metrics still remain. The CIOVs can be utilized to describe specific populations of interest, such as in patients with hip dysplasia undergoing combined hip arthroscopy and periacetabular osteotomy. With differing populations, however, the presence and/or absence of modifying factors limits cross-comparison of CIOVs. Utilizing a different perspective, such as the use of simple questions that are important for both the patient and the surgeon, can provide important information that helps fill in the gaps left from traditional PROs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
期刊最新文献
Letter Regarding "Adding Dexmedetomidine to Intra-Articular Local Anesthetics Results in Prolonged Analgesia After Knee Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis" - Authors' Reply. Most Athletes who fail to Return to Sport After Latarjet Procedure Cite Psychological Factors: a Systematic Review. Author Reply to Letter to the Editor "Comments on the Article 'Anterior Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy in the Setting of Genu Recurvatum'". Comments on the article "Technical Note: Anterior opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy in the setting of genu recurvatum" published in Arthroscopy Techniques 2023, 12(11): e1559 - e1566. Editorial Commentary: Anatomic Tibiofibular and Partially Anatomic-Based Fibular Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction Techniques Are Biomechanically Superior to Non-Anatomic Reconstruction Techniques: A Tibial Tunnel is the Gold Standard for An Anatomic Reconstruction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1