Jongmin Yoon , Haengjin Song , Ji Soo Park , Jeong Ho Kim , Yearin Jun , Sang-Ah Gim , Changhee Hong , Kyung Mi An , Joon-Tae Park , Jung Woo Lee , Hongchul Yoon , Yun Seok Kim , Sang Geon Kim
{"title":"与用于 2 型糖尿病治疗的 Fasiglifam 相比,新型 GPR40 激动剂 Xelaglifam 的肝毒性风险更低。","authors":"Jongmin Yoon , Haengjin Song , Ji Soo Park , Jeong Ho Kim , Yearin Jun , Sang-Ah Gim , Changhee Hong , Kyung Mi An , Joon-Tae Park , Jung Woo Lee , Hongchul Yoon , Yun Seok Kim , Sang Geon Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.biopha.2024.117674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fasiglifam, a candidate targeting GPR40, showed efficacy in clinical trials for type 2 diabetes but exerted liver toxicity. This study investigated the drug-induced liver injury (DILI) risk of Xelaglifam, a new GPR40 agonist, based on the potential toxicity mechanism of Fasiglifam; transporter inhibition, mitochondrial dysfunction, reactive metabolite formation, and covalent binding to proteins. In the hepatobiliary transporter assay, Xelaglifam showed a broader safety margin (>10-fold) against bile acid transporters, suggesting its less likelihood to cause bile acids accumulation, unlike Fasiglifam (<10-fold safety margin). Moreover, Xelaglifam showed no effect on glycocholic acid accumulation at higher concentrations than the estimated C<sub>max</sub> in the 3D human liver model, whereas Fasiglifam affected the accumulation. In the HepaRG spheroids 3D model, the AC<sub>50</sub> values of Xelaglifam for mitochondrial function-related parameters were higher than Fasiglifam. Unlike Fasiglifam, none of the cell parameters for Xelaglifam were below the estimated 5x C<sub>max</sub>. Additionally, the glucuronide metabolite of Xelaglifam was negligible (<1 % of the parent) in the Safety Testing, indicating a limited contribution to DILI. Fasiglifam activated genes related to liver disease, whereas Xelaglifam had no effect; instead, it increased FXR activity, a bile acid regulator. Notably, toxicity studies in rats and monkeys showed no adverse liver effects at higher exposure levels than the effective human blood concentration. Overall, these results support a low risk of DILI for Xelaglifam treatment and the justification for its long-term use for treating type 2 diabetes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8966,"journal":{"name":"Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 117674"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lower hepatotoxicity risk in Xelaglifam, a novel GPR40 agonist, compared to Fasiglifam for type 2 diabetes therapy\",\"authors\":\"Jongmin Yoon , Haengjin Song , Ji Soo Park , Jeong Ho Kim , Yearin Jun , Sang-Ah Gim , Changhee Hong , Kyung Mi An , Joon-Tae Park , Jung Woo Lee , Hongchul Yoon , Yun Seok Kim , Sang Geon Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biopha.2024.117674\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Fasiglifam, a candidate targeting GPR40, showed efficacy in clinical trials for type 2 diabetes but exerted liver toxicity. This study investigated the drug-induced liver injury (DILI) risk of Xelaglifam, a new GPR40 agonist, based on the potential toxicity mechanism of Fasiglifam; transporter inhibition, mitochondrial dysfunction, reactive metabolite formation, and covalent binding to proteins. In the hepatobiliary transporter assay, Xelaglifam showed a broader safety margin (>10-fold) against bile acid transporters, suggesting its less likelihood to cause bile acids accumulation, unlike Fasiglifam (<10-fold safety margin). Moreover, Xelaglifam showed no effect on glycocholic acid accumulation at higher concentrations than the estimated C<sub>max</sub> in the 3D human liver model, whereas Fasiglifam affected the accumulation. In the HepaRG spheroids 3D model, the AC<sub>50</sub> values of Xelaglifam for mitochondrial function-related parameters were higher than Fasiglifam. Unlike Fasiglifam, none of the cell parameters for Xelaglifam were below the estimated 5x C<sub>max</sub>. Additionally, the glucuronide metabolite of Xelaglifam was negligible (<1 % of the parent) in the Safety Testing, indicating a limited contribution to DILI. Fasiglifam activated genes related to liver disease, whereas Xelaglifam had no effect; instead, it increased FXR activity, a bile acid regulator. Notably, toxicity studies in rats and monkeys showed no adverse liver effects at higher exposure levels than the effective human blood concentration. Overall, these results support a low risk of DILI for Xelaglifam treatment and the justification for its long-term use for treating type 2 diabetes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy\",\"volume\":\"181 \",\"pages\":\"Article 117674\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0753332224015609\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0753332224015609","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Lower hepatotoxicity risk in Xelaglifam, a novel GPR40 agonist, compared to Fasiglifam for type 2 diabetes therapy
Fasiglifam, a candidate targeting GPR40, showed efficacy in clinical trials for type 2 diabetes but exerted liver toxicity. This study investigated the drug-induced liver injury (DILI) risk of Xelaglifam, a new GPR40 agonist, based on the potential toxicity mechanism of Fasiglifam; transporter inhibition, mitochondrial dysfunction, reactive metabolite formation, and covalent binding to proteins. In the hepatobiliary transporter assay, Xelaglifam showed a broader safety margin (>10-fold) against bile acid transporters, suggesting its less likelihood to cause bile acids accumulation, unlike Fasiglifam (<10-fold safety margin). Moreover, Xelaglifam showed no effect on glycocholic acid accumulation at higher concentrations than the estimated Cmax in the 3D human liver model, whereas Fasiglifam affected the accumulation. In the HepaRG spheroids 3D model, the AC50 values of Xelaglifam for mitochondrial function-related parameters were higher than Fasiglifam. Unlike Fasiglifam, none of the cell parameters for Xelaglifam were below the estimated 5x Cmax. Additionally, the glucuronide metabolite of Xelaglifam was negligible (<1 % of the parent) in the Safety Testing, indicating a limited contribution to DILI. Fasiglifam activated genes related to liver disease, whereas Xelaglifam had no effect; instead, it increased FXR activity, a bile acid regulator. Notably, toxicity studies in rats and monkeys showed no adverse liver effects at higher exposure levels than the effective human blood concentration. Overall, these results support a low risk of DILI for Xelaglifam treatment and the justification for its long-term use for treating type 2 diabetes.
期刊介绍:
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy stands as a multidisciplinary journal, presenting a spectrum of original research reports, reviews, and communications in the realms of clinical and basic medicine, as well as pharmacology. The journal spans various fields, including Cancer, Nutriceutics, Neurodegenerative, Cardiac, and Infectious Diseases.