确定前列腺癌体外放射治疗保留性结构的潜力:剂量学研究。

Jennifer Le Guevelou, Ayad Houssayni, Stéphane Key, Axel Largent, Caroline Lafond, Oscar Acosta, Antoine Simon, Renaud de Crevoisier, Anaïs Barateau
{"title":"确定前列腺癌体外放射治疗保留性结构的潜力:剂量学研究。","authors":"Jennifer Le Guevelou, Ayad Houssayni, Stéphane Key, Axel Largent, Caroline Lafond, Oscar Acosta, Antoine Simon, Renaud de Crevoisier, Anaïs Barateau","doi":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.05.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of the study was to evaluate the dosimetric impact of sexual-sparing radiotherapy for prostate cancer, with magnetic resonance-only treatment planning.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Fifteen consecutive patients receiving prostate cancer radiotherapy were selected. A synthetic CT was generated with a deep learning method from each T2-weighted MRI performed at the time of treatment planning. For each patient, two plans were performed: standard treatment planning and sexual-structures sparing treatment planning. The treatment plan was designed to deliver a dose of 78Gy to the prostate and 50Gy to the seminal vesicles in 2Gy daily fractions, using volumetric arc therapy. Dose-volume histograms were computed to compare treatment plans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All plans fulfilled dosimetric objectives and were equivalent regarding planning target volume coverage. The doses delivered to both rectum, bladder, and femoral heads were similar between plans (P=0.20). Sexual-sparing plans enabled to decrease all dosimetric parameters on sexual organs-at-risk. The mean penile bulb dose in sexual-sparing plans was significantly reduced (21.1Gy±20.7 versus 13.4Gy±14.0, P<0.01), however with large variability observed between individuals. The mean dose delivered to the corpora cavernosa was also significantly reduced within sexual-sparing plans (13.1Gy±16.7 versus 8.6Gy±10.4, P<0.01). A significant reduction was also observed in the highest doses delivered to internal pudendal arteries (D10%: 48.4Gy±8.3 versus 33.1Gy±4.6, P<0.05; D5%: 52.0Gy±8.7 versus 36.8Gy±5.5, P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sparing of sexual structures appears feasible, without compromising neither planning target volume coverage nor doses delivered to non-sexual organs at risk. The clinical significance of this dose-reduction requires prospective evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":93921,"journal":{"name":"Cancer radiotherapie : journal de la Societe francaise de radiotherapie oncologique","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defining the potential for sexual structures-sparing for prostate cancer external beam radiotherapy: A dosimetric study.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Le Guevelou, Ayad Houssayni, Stéphane Key, Axel Largent, Caroline Lafond, Oscar Acosta, Antoine Simon, Renaud de Crevoisier, Anaïs Barateau\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.05.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of the study was to evaluate the dosimetric impact of sexual-sparing radiotherapy for prostate cancer, with magnetic resonance-only treatment planning.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Fifteen consecutive patients receiving prostate cancer radiotherapy were selected. A synthetic CT was generated with a deep learning method from each T2-weighted MRI performed at the time of treatment planning. For each patient, two plans were performed: standard treatment planning and sexual-structures sparing treatment planning. The treatment plan was designed to deliver a dose of 78Gy to the prostate and 50Gy to the seminal vesicles in 2Gy daily fractions, using volumetric arc therapy. Dose-volume histograms were computed to compare treatment plans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All plans fulfilled dosimetric objectives and were equivalent regarding planning target volume coverage. The doses delivered to both rectum, bladder, and femoral heads were similar between plans (P=0.20). Sexual-sparing plans enabled to decrease all dosimetric parameters on sexual organs-at-risk. The mean penile bulb dose in sexual-sparing plans was significantly reduced (21.1Gy±20.7 versus 13.4Gy±14.0, P<0.01), however with large variability observed between individuals. The mean dose delivered to the corpora cavernosa was also significantly reduced within sexual-sparing plans (13.1Gy±16.7 versus 8.6Gy±10.4, P<0.01). A significant reduction was also observed in the highest doses delivered to internal pudendal arteries (D10%: 48.4Gy±8.3 versus 33.1Gy±4.6, P<0.05; D5%: 52.0Gy±8.7 versus 36.8Gy±5.5, P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sparing of sexual structures appears feasible, without compromising neither planning target volume coverage nor doses delivered to non-sexual organs at risk. The clinical significance of this dose-reduction requires prospective evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer radiotherapie : journal de la Societe francaise de radiotherapie oncologique\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer radiotherapie : journal de la Societe francaise de radiotherapie oncologique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canrad.2024.05.008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer radiotherapie : journal de la Societe francaise de radiotherapie oncologique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canrad.2024.05.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:该研究旨在评估前列腺癌保留性放射治疗的剂量学影响,仅使用磁共振进行治疗规划:选取了15名连续接受前列腺癌放疗的患者。在制定治疗计划时,利用深度学习方法从每个 T2 加权磁共振成像中生成合成 CT。为每位患者制定了两种治疗计划:标准治疗计划和性结构疏通治疗计划。治疗计划的设计是采用体积弧形疗法,每天以2Gy的分量向前列腺输送78Gy的剂量,向精囊输送50Gy的剂量。计算剂量-体积直方图以比较治疗方案:结果:所有方案都达到了剂量学目标,在计划目标体积覆盖范围方面也不相上下。不同方案对直肠、膀胱和股骨头的剂量相似(P=0.20)。保留性器官的计划能够降低性器官风险的所有剂量参数。在性器官保留计划中,阴茎球部的平均剂量显著降低(21.1Gy±20.7 对 13.4Gy±14.0):保留性器官结构似乎是可行的,既不会影响计划目标容积的覆盖范围,也不会影响投放到有风险的非性器官的剂量。这种剂量减少的临床意义需要进行前瞻性评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Defining the potential for sexual structures-sparing for prostate cancer external beam radiotherapy: A dosimetric study.

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the dosimetric impact of sexual-sparing radiotherapy for prostate cancer, with magnetic resonance-only treatment planning.

Material and methods: Fifteen consecutive patients receiving prostate cancer radiotherapy were selected. A synthetic CT was generated with a deep learning method from each T2-weighted MRI performed at the time of treatment planning. For each patient, two plans were performed: standard treatment planning and sexual-structures sparing treatment planning. The treatment plan was designed to deliver a dose of 78Gy to the prostate and 50Gy to the seminal vesicles in 2Gy daily fractions, using volumetric arc therapy. Dose-volume histograms were computed to compare treatment plans.

Results: All plans fulfilled dosimetric objectives and were equivalent regarding planning target volume coverage. The doses delivered to both rectum, bladder, and femoral heads were similar between plans (P=0.20). Sexual-sparing plans enabled to decrease all dosimetric parameters on sexual organs-at-risk. The mean penile bulb dose in sexual-sparing plans was significantly reduced (21.1Gy±20.7 versus 13.4Gy±14.0, P<0.01), however with large variability observed between individuals. The mean dose delivered to the corpora cavernosa was also significantly reduced within sexual-sparing plans (13.1Gy±16.7 versus 8.6Gy±10.4, P<0.01). A significant reduction was also observed in the highest doses delivered to internal pudendal arteries (D10%: 48.4Gy±8.3 versus 33.1Gy±4.6, P<0.05; D5%: 52.0Gy±8.7 versus 36.8Gy±5.5, P<0.05).

Conclusion: Sparing of sexual structures appears feasible, without compromising neither planning target volume coverage nor doses delivered to non-sexual organs at risk. The clinical significance of this dose-reduction requires prospective evaluation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Safety of concurrent trastuzumab-emtansine and radiation therapy for breast cancer: Single-centre experience from a morbidity and mortality review meetings procedure. Interpreting the patterns of local failure following postoperative volumetric-modulated arctherapy in oral cavity and oropharynx cancers: Impact of the different methods of analysis. Defining the potential for sexual structures-sparing for prostate cancer external beam radiotherapy: A dosimetric study. Erratum to "Voice quality after surgery or radiotherapy for glottic T1 squamous cell carcinoma: Results of the VOQUAL study" [Cancer Radiother. 28 (2024) 373-379]. [Short- and medium-term tolerance of hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1