Pub Date : 2024-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2024.07.013
Sophie Renard , Laure Parent , Ludovic de Marzi , Pelagia Tsoutsou , Youlia Kirova
Electron radiotherapy has long been preferred to photons for the treatment of superficial lesions because of its physical characteristics (high dose at the surface, rapid decrease in depth). Other characteristics (penumbra, heterogeneity on an oblique or irregular surface) make them difficult to use. In most indications (skin cancers, head and neck, medulloblastoma), with technical progress, in some cases they have been replaced by intensity-modulated conformal radiotherapy, brachytherapy and contact therapy. Other indications (drainage of mesotheliomas or irradiation of benign lesions) have disappeared. The low frequency of use leads to problems of safety and cost-effectiveness. However, modern photon radiotherapy techniques are still less effective than electrons in specific indications such as total skin irradiation (mycosis fungoides) or certain thin chest wall irradiations after total mastectomy, reirradiation or paediatric treatments without protons. Flash therapy, initiated by electrons, has been developed over the last 10 years, providing high-dose irradiation in an extremely short time. Initial results show good efficacy, with fewer side effects than with conventional radiotherapy. These results are leading to clinical technological developments on a larger scale. Although it has been replaced in most indications by more modern techniques, electron radiotherapy remains essential for targeted indications in specialised centres. The emergence of flash therapy will lead to new indications, on machines equipped with this new technology, which have yet to be defined and are currently the responsibility of specialised teams.
{"title":"Electron radiation therapy: Back to the future?","authors":"Sophie Renard , Laure Parent , Ludovic de Marzi , Pelagia Tsoutsou , Youlia Kirova","doi":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.07.013","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.07.013","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Electron radiotherapy has long been preferred to photons for the treatment of superficial lesions because of its physical characteristics (high dose at the surface, rapid decrease in depth). Other characteristics (penumbra, heterogeneity on an oblique or irregular surface) make them difficult to use. In most indications (skin cancers, head and neck, medulloblastoma), with technical progress, in some cases they have been replaced by intensity-modulated conformal radiotherapy, brachytherapy and contact therapy. Other indications (drainage of mesotheliomas or irradiation of benign lesions) have disappeared. The low frequency of use leads to problems of safety and cost-effectiveness. However, modern photon radiotherapy techniques are still less effective than electrons in specific indications such as total skin irradiation (mycosis fungoides) or certain thin chest wall irradiations after total mastectomy, reirradiation or paediatric treatments without protons. Flash therapy, initiated by electrons, has been developed over the last 10 years, providing high-dose irradiation in an extremely short time. Initial results show good efficacy, with fewer side effects than with conventional radiotherapy. These results are leading to clinical technological developments on a larger scale. Although it has been replaced in most indications by more modern techniques, electron radiotherapy remains essential for targeted indications in specialised centres. The emergence of flash therapy will lead to new indications, on machines equipped with this new technology, which have yet to be defined and are currently the responsibility of specialised teams.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9504,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Radiotherapie","volume":"28 6","pages":"Pages 553-559"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142402334","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Current events in radiotherapy oncology are marked by the results of strategic trials, particularly for esophageal and rectal cancers. For resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma, results of the ESOPEC study showed a benefit in overall survival from the perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel compared to chemoradiotherapy (41.4 Gy radiotherapy and carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy). In definitive setting, the CONCORDE study did not show any benefit from dose escalation and the standard dose remains 50 Gy. For resectable pancreatic cancer, the NRG/RTOG0848 study that compared adjuvant chemotherapy with or without chemoradiotherapy found a significant increase of the 5-year disease-free survival rate in the subgroup of node-negative patients. For rectal cancers, the 7-year update of PRODIGE 23 study confirmed the benefit in disease-free- and overall survival of neoadjuvant folinic acid, fluorouracil, irinotecan and oxaliplatin chemotherapy before chemoradiotherapy of T3, T4 or N+ adenocarcinoma, while the update of the RAPIDO study revealed an unacceptable local recurrence rate in the experimental arm. The update of the OPRA study shows a significantly higher 5-year organ preservation rate in favor of the chemoradiotherapy arm followed by consolidation chemotherapy compared to induction chemotherapy followed by CRT. A phase 2 study, including 41 patients with mismatch repair deficient, locally advanced rectal cancer reported that exclusive treatment with anti-PDL1 immunotherapy (dostarlimab) for 6 months resulted in complete clinical response without the need of additional treatment (neither radiotherapy nor surgery). For anal carcinoma, the analysis of survival and toxicity profiles of patients treated for a small stage T1 or T2 tumor were compared depending on whether they received exclusive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. The addition of chemotherapy to radiotherapy did not show any survival benefit but significantly increased toxicity and the risk of radiotherapy disruption.
{"title":"Études qui changent les pratiques en oncoradiothérapie digestive","authors":"Anouchka Modesto , Audrey Keller , Rosine Guimbaud , Véronique Vendrely","doi":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.09.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.09.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Current events in radiotherapy oncology are marked by the results of strategic trials, particularly for esophageal and rectal cancers. For resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma, results of the ESOPEC study showed a benefit in overall survival from the perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel compared to chemoradiotherapy (41.4<!--> <!-->Gy radiotherapy and carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy). In definitive setting, the CONCORDE study did not show any benefit from dose escalation and the standard dose remains 50<!--> <!-->Gy. For resectable pancreatic cancer, the NRG/RTOG0848 study that compared adjuvant chemotherapy with or without chemoradiotherapy found a significant increase of the 5-year disease-free survival rate in the subgroup of node-negative patients. For rectal cancers, the 7-year update of PRODIGE 23 study confirmed the benefit in disease-free- and overall survival of neoadjuvant folinic acid, fluorouracil, irinotecan and oxaliplatin chemotherapy before chemoradiotherapy of T3, T4 or N+ adenocarcinoma, while the update of the RAPIDO study revealed an unacceptable local recurrence rate in the experimental arm. The update of the OPRA study shows a significantly higher 5-year organ preservation rate in favor of the chemoradiotherapy arm followed by consolidation chemotherapy compared to induction chemotherapy followed by CRT. A phase 2 study, including 41 patients with mismatch repair deficient, locally advanced rectal cancer reported that exclusive treatment with anti-PDL1 immunotherapy (dostarlimab) for 6 months resulted in complete clinical response without the need of additional treatment (neither radiotherapy nor surgery). For anal carcinoma, the analysis of survival and toxicity profiles of patients treated for a small stage T1 or T2 tumor were compared depending on whether they received exclusive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. The addition of chemotherapy to radiotherapy did not show any survival benefit but significantly increased toxicity and the risk of radiotherapy disruption.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9504,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Radiotherapie","volume":"28 6","pages":"Pages 519-522"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142483056","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
With numerous clinical, technological or strategic innovations, radiation therapy is constantly evolving, contributing to major quality and safety issues, in a context where new regulatory standards are required. In this article, we will describe the conditions for implementing and applying the requirements for accreditation, periodic certification and peer audit in France.
{"title":"Actualités réglementaires en radiothérapie en France en 2024 : enjeux de qualité et sécurité des soins","authors":"Céline Bourgier , Christophe Hennequin , Thomas Leroy , Fabrice Lorchel","doi":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.08.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.08.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With numerous clinical, technological or strategic innovations, radiation therapy is constantly evolving, contributing to major quality and safety issues, in a context where new regulatory standards are required. In this article, we will describe the conditions for implementing and applying the requirements for accreditation, periodic certification and peer audit in France.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9504,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Radiotherapie","volume":"28 6","pages":"Pages 523-526"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142378728","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2024.07.004
Youlia Kirova, Jihane Bouziane, Pierre Loap
There is new data in the fractionation modalities and these are the really the practice-changing trials of last years: can we use hypo fractionated whole breast radiotherapy in patients presented with ductal carcinoma in situ? Can we realize hypofractionated whole breast radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost? What about hypofractionated irradiation after mastectomy with reconstruction? Can we do hypofractionation to lymph nodes without risk of increased toxicity? The purpose of this work is to respond with the last evidence-based recently presented or published data.
{"title":"Practice-changing trials on breast cancer","authors":"Youlia Kirova, Jihane Bouziane, Pierre Loap","doi":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.07.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.07.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There is new data in the fractionation modalities and these are the really the practice-changing trials of last years: can we use hypo fractionated whole breast radiotherapy in patients presented with ductal carcinoma in situ? Can we realize hypofractionated whole breast radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost? What about hypofractionated irradiation after mastectomy with reconstruction? Can we do hypofractionation to lymph nodes without risk of increased toxicity? The purpose of this work is to respond with the last evidence-based recently presented or published data.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9504,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Radiotherapie","volume":"28 6","pages":"Pages 510-512"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142334353","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2024.07.015
François Lucia , Delphine Antoni , Loïg Vaugier , Loïg Duvergé , Sébastien Thureau , Vincent Bourbonne
Small-cell lung cancer is the most aggressive form of lung neoplasia, treated in recent decades with chemoradiotherapy in case of limited stage and chemotherapy alone at the metastatic stage. In the last few years, the advent of immunotherapy has changed the landscape in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer, and to a lesser degree in small-cell lung cancer. Despite the recent advances in research, small-cell lung cancer is still considered an aggressive and lethal disease characterized by high recurrence or metastatic potential. As stereotactic radiotherapy has established itself as the standard of care in the early stage of inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer and in metastatic disease to treat brain and extracranial metastases, these same issues now arise in the management of small-cell lung cancer. This article aims to review the current knowledge and the potential of stereotactic radiotherapy in small-cell lung cancer.
{"title":"Role of stereotactic radiotherapy in the management of small-cell lung cancer","authors":"François Lucia , Delphine Antoni , Loïg Vaugier , Loïg Duvergé , Sébastien Thureau , Vincent Bourbonne","doi":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.07.015","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.07.015","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Small-cell lung cancer is the most aggressive form of lung neoplasia, treated in recent decades with chemoradiotherapy in case of limited stage and chemotherapy alone at the metastatic stage. In the last few years, the advent of immunotherapy has changed the landscape in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer, and to a lesser degree in small-cell lung cancer. Despite the recent advances in research, small-cell lung cancer is still considered an aggressive and lethal disease characterized by high recurrence or metastatic potential. As stereotactic radiotherapy has established itself as the standard of care in the early stage of inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer and in metastatic disease to treat brain and extracranial metastases, these same issues now arise in the management of small-cell lung cancer. This article aims to review the current knowledge and the potential of stereotactic radiotherapy in small-cell lung cancer.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9504,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Radiotherapie","volume":"28 6","pages":"Pages 628-632"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142367864","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2024.07.017
Thibaud Haaser , Yannis Constantinides , David Osman , Lucien Lahmi , Catherine Durdux , Vincent Bourbonne , Véronique Cheval , Renaud de Crevoisier , Catherine Dejean , Angélique Ducteil , Alexandre Escande , Cédric Gesbert , Youssef Ghannam , Claire Lemanski , Sébastien Thureau , Jean-Léon Lagrange , Florence Huguet , Commission éthique de la Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO)
The term “event” covers a wide range of concrete situations in radiation oncology, from particularly intense radiation-related side effects to the possibility of technical or human error. Although quality procedures are an integral part of radiotherapy oncology department operations ensuring the analysis and prevention of such events, their occurrence during radiation treatment still has a significant impact on patients and their experience of the treatment process, as well as on health professionals. These practical, emotional and symbolic impacts are all the greater when the event occurs in the aftermath of an error. The ethical approach therefore comprises three essential stages: recognizing the event as such, informing those involved of the event and, finally, creating conditions for the continuation of care. Each of these stages is marked by specific issues and questions, requiring a complex ethical approach that constantly involves reconciling the possible divergent perceptions of patients and health professionals. The occurrence of an event can also lead to a genuine crisis of confidence with multiple dimensions, which health professionals will also have to face and to support. Finally, the occurrence of an event calls into question not only our responsibility towards patients, but also our ideal of control. We need to criticize our culture of performance, rethink our approach to events and errors, and see them also as opportunities for positive change.
{"title":"Survenue d’un évènement ou d’une erreur en oncologie radiothérapie : concilier les perspectives pour préserver le soin","authors":"Thibaud Haaser , Yannis Constantinides , David Osman , Lucien Lahmi , Catherine Durdux , Vincent Bourbonne , Véronique Cheval , Renaud de Crevoisier , Catherine Dejean , Angélique Ducteil , Alexandre Escande , Cédric Gesbert , Youssef Ghannam , Claire Lemanski , Sébastien Thureau , Jean-Léon Lagrange , Florence Huguet , Commission éthique de la Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO)","doi":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.07.017","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.07.017","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The term “event” covers a wide range of concrete situations in radiation oncology, from particularly intense radiation-related side effects to the possibility of technical or human error. Although quality procedures are an integral part of radiotherapy oncology department operations ensuring the analysis and prevention of such events, their occurrence during radiation treatment still has a significant impact on patients and their experience of the treatment process, as well as on health professionals. These practical, emotional and symbolic impacts are all the greater when the event occurs in the aftermath of an error. The ethical approach therefore comprises three essential stages: recognizing the event as such, informing those involved of the event and, finally, creating conditions for the continuation of care. Each of these stages is marked by specific issues and questions, requiring a complex ethical approach that constantly involves reconciling the possible divergent perceptions of patients and health professionals. The occurrence of an event can also lead to a genuine crisis of confidence with multiple dimensions, which health professionals will also have to face and to support. Finally, the occurrence of an event calls into question not only our responsibility towards patients, but also our ideal of control. We need to criticize our culture of performance, rethink our approach to events and errors, and see them also as opportunities for positive change.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9504,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Radiotherapie","volume":"28 6","pages":"Pages 527-533"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142378727","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This review systematically investigates the role of radiomics in radiotherapy, with a particular emphasis on the use of quantitative imaging biomarkers for predicting clinical outcomes, assessing toxicity, and optimizing treatment planning. While the review encompasses various applications of radiomics in radiotherapy, it particularly highlights its potential for guiding reirradiation of recurrent cancers.
Methods
A systematic review was conducted based on a Medline search with the search engine PubMed using the keywords “radiomics or radiomic” and “radiotherapy or reirradiation”. Out of 189 abstracts reviewed, 147 original articles were included in the analysis. These studies were categorized by tumor localization, imaging modality, study objectives, and performance metrics, with a particular emphasis on the inclusion of external validation and adherence to a standardized radiomics pipeline.
Results
The review identified 14 tumor localizations, with the majority of studies focusing on lung (33 studies), head and neck (27 studies), and brain (15 studies) cancers. CT was the most frequently employed imaging modality (77 studies) for radiomics, followed by MRI (46 studies) and PET (13 studies). The overall AUC across all studies, primarily focused on predicting the risk of recurrence (94 studies) or toxicity (41 studies), was 0.80 (SD = 0.08). However, only 24 studies (16.3%) included external validation, with a slightly lower AUC compared to those without it. For studies using CT versus MRI or PET, both had a median AUC of 0.79, with IQRs of 0.73–0.86 for CT and 0.76–0.855 for MRI/PET, showing no significant differences in performance. Five studies involving reirradiation reported a median AUC of 0.81 (IQR: 0.73–0.825).
Conclusion
Radiomics demonstrates considerable potential in personalizing radiotherapy by improving treatment precision through better outcome prediction and treatment planning. However, its clinical adoption is hindered by the lack of external validation and variability in study designs. Future research should focus on implementing rigorous validation methods and standardizing imaging protocols to enhance the reliability and generalizability of radiomics in clinical radiotherapy, with particular attention to its application in reirradiation.
{"title":"Radiomics-driven personalized radiotherapy for primary and recurrent tumors: A general review with a focus on reirradiation","authors":"Arnaud Beddok , Fanny Orlhac , Laura Rozenblum , Valentin Calugaru , Gilles Créhange , Laurent Dercle , Christophe Nioche , Juliette Thariat , Thibault Marin , Georges El Fakhri , Irène Buvat","doi":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.09.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.09.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This review systematically investigates the role of radiomics in radiotherapy, with a particular emphasis on the use of quantitative imaging biomarkers for predicting clinical outcomes, assessing toxicity, and optimizing treatment planning. While the review encompasses various applications of radiomics in radiotherapy, it particularly highlights its potential for guiding reirradiation of recurrent cancers.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic review was conducted based on a Medline search with the search engine PubMed using the keywords “radiomics or radiomic” and “radiotherapy or reirradiation”. Out of 189 abstracts reviewed, 147 original articles were included in the analysis. These studies were categorized by tumor localization, imaging modality, study objectives, and performance metrics, with a particular emphasis on the inclusion of external validation and adherence to a standardized radiomics pipeline.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The review identified 14 tumor localizations, with the majority of studies focusing on lung (33 studies), head and neck (27 studies), and brain (15 studies) cancers. CT was the most frequently employed imaging modality (77 studies) for radiomics, followed by MRI (46 studies) and PET (13 studies). The overall AUC across all studies, primarily focused on predicting the risk of recurrence (94 studies) or toxicity (41 studies), was 0.80 (SD<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.08). However, only 24 studies (16.3%) included external validation, with a slightly lower AUC compared to those without it. For studies using CT versus MRI or PET, both had a median AUC of 0.79, with IQRs of 0.73–0.86 for CT and 0.76–0.855 for MRI/PET, showing no significant differences in performance. Five studies involving reirradiation reported a median AUC of 0.81 (IQR: 0.73–0.825).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Radiomics demonstrates considerable potential in personalizing radiotherapy by improving treatment precision through better outcome prediction and treatment planning. However, its clinical adoption is hindered by the lack of external validation and variability in study designs. Future research should focus on implementing rigorous validation methods and standardizing imaging protocols to enhance the reliability and generalizability of radiomics in clinical radiotherapy, with particular attention to its application in reirradiation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9504,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Radiotherapie","volume":"28 6","pages":"Pages 597-602"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142483060","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2024.07.007
Olivier Riou , Jessica Prunaretty , Morgan Michalet
Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) is a recent development in radiotherapy technology and treatment personalization that allows treatment to be tailored to the daily anatomical changes of patients. While it was until recently only performed “offline”, i.e. between two radiotherapy sessions, it is now possible during ART to perform a daily online adaptive process for a given patient. Therefore, ART allows a daily customization to ensure optimal coverage of the treatment target volumes with minimized margins, taking into account only the uncertainties related to the adaptive process itself. This optimization appears particularly relevant in case of daily variations in the positioning of the target volume or of the organs at risk (OAR) associated with a proximity of these volumes and a tenuous therapeutic index. ART aims to minimize severe acute and late toxicity and allows tumor dose escalation. These new achievements have been possible thanks to technological development, the contribution of new multimodal and onboard imaging modalities and the integration of artificial intelligence tools for the contouring, planning and delivery of radiation therapy. Online ART is currently available on two types of radiotherapy machines: MR-linear accelerators and recently CBCT-linear accelerators. We will first describe the benefits, advantages, constraints and limitations of each of these two modalities, as well as the online adaptive process itself. We will then evaluate the clinical situations for which online adaptive radiotherapy is particularly indicated on MR- and CBCT-linear accelerators. Finally, we will detail some challenges and possible solutions in the development of online ART in the coming years.
自适应放射治疗（ART）是放射治疗技术和个性化治疗的最新发展，可根据病人每天的解剖变化进行治疗。虽然直到最近它还只能在 "离线 "状态下进行，即在两次放疗之间进行，但现在在 ART 期间可以对特定患者执行每日在线自适应过程。因此，ART 允许每天进行定制，以确保治疗靶区的最佳覆盖范围和最小边缘，同时只考虑与自适应过程本身相关的不确定性。当目标体积或危险器官（OAR）的位置每天都在变化时，这种优化就显得尤为重要。ART 旨在最大限度地减少严重的急性和晚期毒性，并允许肿瘤剂量升级。这些新成就的取得要归功于技术的发展、新的多模态和机载成像模式的贡献，以及人工智能工具在放射治疗的轮廓、计划和实施方面的集成。在线 ART 目前可用于两种类型的放射治疗机：MR 线性加速器和最近的 CBCT 线性加速器。我们将首先介绍这两种模式各自的优点、优势、制约因素和局限性，以及在线自适应过程本身。然后，我们将评估在线自适应放疗特别适用于磁共振和 CBCT 线性加速器的临床情况。最后，我们将详细介绍在线自适应放疗在未来几年的发展中面临的一些挑战和可能的解决方案。
{"title":"Personalizing radiotherapy with adaptive radiotherapy: Interest and challenges","authors":"Olivier Riou , Jessica Prunaretty , Morgan Michalet","doi":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.07.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.07.007","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) is a recent development in radiotherapy technology and treatment personalization that allows treatment to be tailored to the daily anatomical changes of patients. While it was until recently only performed “offline”, i.e. between two radiotherapy sessions, it is now possible during ART to perform a daily online adaptive process for a given patient. Therefore, ART allows a daily customization to ensure optimal coverage of the treatment target volumes with minimized margins, taking into account only the uncertainties related to the adaptive process itself. This optimization appears particularly relevant in case of daily variations in the positioning of the target volume or of the organs at risk (OAR) associated with a proximity of these volumes and a tenuous therapeutic index. ART aims to minimize severe acute and late toxicity and allows tumor dose escalation. These new achievements have been possible thanks to technological development, the contribution of new multimodal and onboard imaging modalities and the integration of artificial intelligence tools for the contouring, planning and delivery of radiation therapy. Online ART is currently available on two types of radiotherapy machines: MR-linear accelerators and recently CBCT-linear accelerators. We will first describe the benefits, advantages, constraints and limitations of each of these two modalities, as well as the online adaptive process itself. We will then evaluate the clinical situations for which online adaptive radiotherapy is particularly indicated on MR- and CBCT-linear accelerators. Finally, we will detail some challenges and possible solutions in the development of online ART in the coming years.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9504,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Radiotherapie","volume":"28 6","pages":"Pages 603-609"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142367862","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2024.07.014
Vincent Bourbonne , Luc Ollivier , Delphine Antoni , Olivier Pradier , Axel Cailleteau , Ulrike Schick , Georges Noël , François Lucia
Brain radiation necrosis (BRN) is a significant and complex side effect of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). Differentiating BRN from local tumor recurrence is critical, requiring advanced diagnostic techniques and a multidisciplinary approach. BRN typically manifests months to years post-treatment, presenting with radiological changes on MRI and may produce neurological symptoms. Key risk factors include the volume of irradiated brain tissue, the radiation dose, and prior radiotherapy history. This manuscript reviews the diagnostic process for BRN, emphasizing the importance of assessing baseline risk, clinical evaluation, and advanced imaging modalities. Multimodal imaging enhances diagnostic accuracy and aids in distinguishing BRN from tumor relapse. Therapeutic management varies based on symptoms. Asymptomatic BRN may be monitored with regular imaging, while symptomatic BRN often requires corticosteroids to reduce inflammation. Emerging therapies like bevacizumab have shown promise in clinical trials, with significant radiographic and symptomatic improvement. Surgical intervention may be necessary for histological confirmation and severe, treatment-resistant cases. Ongoing research aims to improve diagnostic accuracy and treatment efficacy, enhancing patient outcomes and quality of life. This review underscores the need for a multidisciplinary approach and continuous advancements to address the challenges posed by BRN in brain tumor patients.
{"title":"Diagnosis and management of brain radiation necrosis","authors":"Vincent Bourbonne , Luc Ollivier , Delphine Antoni , Olivier Pradier , Axel Cailleteau , Ulrike Schick , Georges Noël , François Lucia","doi":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.07.014","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.07.014","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Brain radiation necrosis (BRN) is a significant and complex side effect of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). Differentiating BRN from local tumor recurrence is critical, requiring advanced diagnostic techniques and a multidisciplinary approach. BRN typically manifests months to years post-treatment, presenting with radiological changes on MRI and may produce neurological symptoms. Key risk factors include the volume of irradiated brain tissue, the radiation dose, and prior radiotherapy history. This manuscript reviews the diagnostic process for BRN, emphasizing the importance of assessing baseline risk, clinical evaluation, and advanced imaging modalities. Multimodal imaging enhances diagnostic accuracy and aids in distinguishing BRN from tumor relapse. Therapeutic management varies based on symptoms. Asymptomatic BRN may be monitored with regular imaging, while symptomatic BRN often requires corticosteroids to reduce inflammation. Emerging therapies like bevacizumab have shown promise in clinical trials, with significant radiographic and symptomatic improvement. Surgical intervention may be necessary for histological confirmation and severe, treatment-resistant cases. Ongoing research aims to improve diagnostic accuracy and treatment efficacy, enhancing patient outcomes and quality of life. This review underscores the need for a multidisciplinary approach and continuous advancements to address the challenges posed by BRN in brain tumor patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9504,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Radiotherapie","volume":"28 6","pages":"Pages 547-552"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142376458","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2024.07.012
Manou Rakotosamimanana , Jean-Michel Hannoun-Lévi , Sofia Rivera
Approximately 10 to 15% of patients with breast cancer will have a local recurrence after initial conservative treatment or mastectomy. Total mastectomy has historically been the standard treatment for local recurrence. However, the question of reirradiation may arise as part of a second conservative treatment in conjunction with segmentectomy or in the case of chest wall recurrence to improve local control. Different modalities are available: brachytherapy, external beam radiotherapy with or without hyperthermia. Although the carcinologic results are encouraging, this complex situation requires rigorous patient selection and technical requirements to achieve the best local control and limit toxicity events. This article presents a review of the literature on the different indications and techniques for reirradiation of ipsilateral recurrent breast cancer, with the aim of providing decision support in clinical practice.
{"title":"Réirradiation des récidives de carcinomes mammaires","authors":"Manou Rakotosamimanana , Jean-Michel Hannoun-Lévi , Sofia Rivera","doi":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.07.012","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.canrad.2024.07.012","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Approximately 10 to 15% of patients with breast cancer will have a local recurrence after initial conservative treatment or mastectomy. Total mastectomy has historically been the standard treatment for local recurrence. However, the question of reirradiation may arise as part of a second conservative treatment in conjunction with segmentectomy or in the case of chest wall recurrence to improve local control. Different modalities are available: brachytherapy, external beam radiotherapy with or without hyperthermia. Although the carcinologic results are encouraging, this complex situation requires rigorous patient selection and technical requirements to achieve the best local control and limit toxicity events. This article presents a review of the literature on the different indications and techniques for reirradiation of ipsilateral recurrent breast cancer, with the aim of providing decision support in clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9504,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Radiotherapie","volume":"28 6","pages":"Pages 586-590"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142395956","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号