胶质母细胞瘤免疫检查点抑制剂临床试验的现状:系统综述。

IF 3.7 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neuro-oncology advances Pub Date : 2024-11-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/noajnl/vdae174
Ethan Schonfeld, John Choi, Andrew Tran, Lily H Kim, Michael Lim
{"title":"胶质母细胞瘤免疫检查点抑制剂临床试验的现状:系统综述。","authors":"Ethan Schonfeld, John Choi, Andrew Tran, Lily H Kim, Michael Lim","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdae174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glioblastoma is characterized by rapid tumor growth and high invasiveness. The tumor microenvironment of glioblastoma is highly immunosuppressive with both intrinsic and adaptive resistance mechanisms that result in disease recurrence despite current immunotherapeutic strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this systematic review of clinical trials involving immunotherapy for glioblastoma using ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed databases from 2016 and onward, we explore immunotherapeutic modalities involving immune checkpoint blockade (ICB).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 106 clinical trials were identified, 18 with clinical outcomes. ICB in glioblastoma has failed to improve overall survival compared to the current standard of care, including those therapies inhibiting multiple checkpoints. Among all immune checkpoint trials, targets included programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) (35/48), PD-L1 (12/48), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (6/48), TIGIT (2/48), B7-H3 (2/48), and TIM-3 (1/48). Preliminary results from combination immunotherapies (32.1% of all trials) demonstrated improved treatment efficacy compared to monotherapy, specifically those combining checkpoint therapy with another immunotherapy modality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinical trials involving ICB strategies for glioblastoma have not demonstrated improved survival. Comparison of therapeutic efficacy across trials was limited due to heterogeneity in the study population and outcome operationalization. Standardization of future trials could facilitate comparison across immunotherapy modalities for robust meta-analysis. Current immunotherapy trials have shifted focus toward combination strategies; preliminary results suggest that they are more encouraging than mono-modality immunotherapies. Given the intrinsic heterogeneity of glioblastoma, the utilization of immune markers will be key for the development of future immunotherapy approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"6 1","pages":"vdae174"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11555435/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The landscape of immune checkpoint inhibitor clinical trials in glioblastoma: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Ethan Schonfeld, John Choi, Andrew Tran, Lily H Kim, Michael Lim\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/noajnl/vdae174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glioblastoma is characterized by rapid tumor growth and high invasiveness. The tumor microenvironment of glioblastoma is highly immunosuppressive with both intrinsic and adaptive resistance mechanisms that result in disease recurrence despite current immunotherapeutic strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this systematic review of clinical trials involving immunotherapy for glioblastoma using ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed databases from 2016 and onward, we explore immunotherapeutic modalities involving immune checkpoint blockade (ICB).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 106 clinical trials were identified, 18 with clinical outcomes. ICB in glioblastoma has failed to improve overall survival compared to the current standard of care, including those therapies inhibiting multiple checkpoints. Among all immune checkpoint trials, targets included programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) (35/48), PD-L1 (12/48), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (6/48), TIGIT (2/48), B7-H3 (2/48), and TIM-3 (1/48). Preliminary results from combination immunotherapies (32.1% of all trials) demonstrated improved treatment efficacy compared to monotherapy, specifically those combining checkpoint therapy with another immunotherapy modality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinical trials involving ICB strategies for glioblastoma have not demonstrated improved survival. Comparison of therapeutic efficacy across trials was limited due to heterogeneity in the study population and outcome operationalization. Standardization of future trials could facilitate comparison across immunotherapy modalities for robust meta-analysis. Current immunotherapy trials have shifted focus toward combination strategies; preliminary results suggest that they are more encouraging than mono-modality immunotherapies. Given the intrinsic heterogeneity of glioblastoma, the utilization of immune markers will be key for the development of future immunotherapy approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuro-oncology advances\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"vdae174\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11555435/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuro-oncology advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdae174\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdae174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胶质母细胞瘤的特点是肿瘤生长迅速、侵袭性强。胶质母细胞瘤的肿瘤微环境具有高度免疫抑制性,同时具有内在和适应性抵抗机制,尽管目前有免疫治疗策略,但仍会导致疾病复发:在这篇系统性综述中,我们利用ClinicalTrials.gov和PubMed数据库对2016年及以后涉及胶质母细胞瘤免疫治疗的临床试验进行了回顾,探讨了涉及免疫检查点阻断(ICB)的免疫治疗模式:结果:共发现106项临床试验,其中18项具有临床结果。与目前的治疗标准相比,胶质母细胞瘤的ICB未能改善总生存率,包括那些抑制多个检查点的疗法。在所有免疫检查点试验中,靶点包括程序性细胞死亡蛋白-1(PD-1)(35/48)、PD-L1(12/48)、细胞毒性T淋巴细胞相关蛋白-4(6/48)、TIGIT(2/48)、B7-H3(2/48)和TIM-3(1/48)。联合免疫疗法(占所有试验的32.1%)的初步结果显示,其疗效优于单一疗法,特别是那些将检查点疗法与另一种免疫疗法相结合的试验:涉及胶质母细胞瘤 ICB 策略的临床试验并未显示出生存率的提高。由于研究人群和结果操作的异质性,各试验的疗效比较受到了限制。未来试验的标准化将有助于对不同免疫疗法模式进行比较,以进行可靠的荟萃分析。目前的免疫疗法试验已将重点转向联合策略;初步结果表明,联合策略比单一模式免疫疗法更令人鼓舞。鉴于胶质母细胞瘤的内在异质性,免疫标记物的利用将是未来免疫疗法发展的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The landscape of immune checkpoint inhibitor clinical trials in glioblastoma: A systematic review.

Background: Glioblastoma is characterized by rapid tumor growth and high invasiveness. The tumor microenvironment of glioblastoma is highly immunosuppressive with both intrinsic and adaptive resistance mechanisms that result in disease recurrence despite current immunotherapeutic strategies.

Methods: In this systematic review of clinical trials involving immunotherapy for glioblastoma using ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed databases from 2016 and onward, we explore immunotherapeutic modalities involving immune checkpoint blockade (ICB).

Results: A total of 106 clinical trials were identified, 18 with clinical outcomes. ICB in glioblastoma has failed to improve overall survival compared to the current standard of care, including those therapies inhibiting multiple checkpoints. Among all immune checkpoint trials, targets included programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) (35/48), PD-L1 (12/48), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (6/48), TIGIT (2/48), B7-H3 (2/48), and TIM-3 (1/48). Preliminary results from combination immunotherapies (32.1% of all trials) demonstrated improved treatment efficacy compared to monotherapy, specifically those combining checkpoint therapy with another immunotherapy modality.

Conclusions: Clinical trials involving ICB strategies for glioblastoma have not demonstrated improved survival. Comparison of therapeutic efficacy across trials was limited due to heterogeneity in the study population and outcome operationalization. Standardization of future trials could facilitate comparison across immunotherapy modalities for robust meta-analysis. Current immunotherapy trials have shifted focus toward combination strategies; preliminary results suggest that they are more encouraging than mono-modality immunotherapies. Given the intrinsic heterogeneity of glioblastoma, the utilization of immune markers will be key for the development of future immunotherapy approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The landscape of immune checkpoint inhibitor clinical trials in glioblastoma: A systematic review. International symposium on inheritable central nervous system (CNS) cancer predisposition: A prologue. Non-small cell lung cancer with synchronous brain metastases: Identification of prognostic factors in a retrospective multicenter study (HOT 1701). Correction to: Effect of bevacizumab on refractory meningiomas: 3D volumetric growth rate versus response assessment in neuro-oncology criteria. Effect of antibiotic drug use on outcome and therapy-related toxicity in patients with glioblastoma-A retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1