皮肤科生活质量指数的拉氏分析。

IF 3.8 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Actas dermo-sifiliograficas Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1016/j.ad.2024.09.020
G Sanclemente, C Mora, D C Aguirre
{"title":"皮肤科生活质量指数的拉氏分析。","authors":"G Sanclemente, C Mora, D C Aguirre","doi":"10.1016/j.ad.2024.09.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Previous results of the Dermatology-Life-Quality-Index (DLQI) validation in Colombia based on the classical test theory (CTT) perspective have showed the need to delve into its measurement properties. Therefore, we aimed to assess the structural validity, internal consistency and item response analysis of the DLQI through the item response theory (IRT) or the Rasch model.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We assessed the dimensionality of the DLQI, determined its difficulty, discrimination and differential functioning and went on to evaluate its internal consistency and discriminative validity among patients with inflammatory and non-inflammatory skin disease. We recruited Colombian patients with different skin diseases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data of 865 patients (mean age, 49.3 years; 61% females) were included. DLQI-scores ranged from 0 up to 30. Internal consistency for dichotomous item #7 showed a McDonald's Omega coefficient of 0.85 (95%CI, 0.84-0.87) and a Cronbach's α coefficient of 0.86 (95%CI, 0.84-0.88). For ordinal item #7, the McDonald's Omega coefficient was 0.87 (95%IC:0.85-0.89) and Cronbach's α coefficient, 0.84 (95%CI, 0.82-0.87). Horn's parallel analysis revealed the presence of DLQI unidimensionality with a 1-factor solution. Only item #1 fitted the PCM model. The remaining items, including item #9, did not show adequate fit due to overlapping responses and order changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The validity of DLQI-COL based on Rasch analysis proved not to be a suitable instrument to evaluate QoL in our dermatologic population. A refined version of the scale with an adequate cross-cultural adaptation and validation process is needed to obtain an appropriate and reliable version of the instrument for QOL measuring in Colombian patients with skin diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":7173,"journal":{"name":"Actas dermo-sifiliograficas","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rasch Analysis Of The Dermatology Life Quality Index.\",\"authors\":\"G Sanclemente, C Mora, D C Aguirre\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ad.2024.09.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Previous results of the Dermatology-Life-Quality-Index (DLQI) validation in Colombia based on the classical test theory (CTT) perspective have showed the need to delve into its measurement properties. Therefore, we aimed to assess the structural validity, internal consistency and item response analysis of the DLQI through the item response theory (IRT) or the Rasch model.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We assessed the dimensionality of the DLQI, determined its difficulty, discrimination and differential functioning and went on to evaluate its internal consistency and discriminative validity among patients with inflammatory and non-inflammatory skin disease. We recruited Colombian patients with different skin diseases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data of 865 patients (mean age, 49.3 years; 61% females) were included. DLQI-scores ranged from 0 up to 30. Internal consistency for dichotomous item #7 showed a McDonald's Omega coefficient of 0.85 (95%CI, 0.84-0.87) and a Cronbach's α coefficient of 0.86 (95%CI, 0.84-0.88). For ordinal item #7, the McDonald's Omega coefficient was 0.87 (95%IC:0.85-0.89) and Cronbach's α coefficient, 0.84 (95%CI, 0.82-0.87). Horn's parallel analysis revealed the presence of DLQI unidimensionality with a 1-factor solution. Only item #1 fitted the PCM model. The remaining items, including item #9, did not show adequate fit due to overlapping responses and order changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The validity of DLQI-COL based on Rasch analysis proved not to be a suitable instrument to evaluate QoL in our dermatologic population. A refined version of the scale with an adequate cross-cultural adaptation and validation process is needed to obtain an appropriate and reliable version of the instrument for QOL measuring in Colombian patients with skin diseases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Actas dermo-sifiliograficas\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Actas dermo-sifiliograficas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ad.2024.09.020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actas dermo-sifiliograficas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ad.2024.09.020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:之前基于经典测验理论(CTT)在哥伦比亚进行的皮肤病学-生活质量指数(DLQI)验证结果表明,有必要深入研究其测量特性。因此,我们旨在通过项目反应理论(IRT)或 Rasch 模型评估 DLQI 的结构效度、内部一致性和项目反应分析:我们评估了 DLQI 的维度,确定了其难度、区分度和差异功能,然后评估了其在炎症性和非炎症性皮肤病患者中的内部一致性和区分有效性。我们招募了患有不同皮肤病的哥伦比亚患者:结果:纳入了 865 名患者(平均年龄 49.3 岁;61% 为女性)的数据。DLQI分值从0到30不等。二分项目 7 的内部一致性显示,麦克唐纳欧米茄系数为 0.85(95%CI,0.84-0.87),克朗巴赫α系数为 0.86(95%CI,0.84-0.88)。对于序数项目 7,麦克唐纳的欧米茄系数为 0.87(95%CI:0.85-0.89),克朗巴赫的 α 系数为 0.84(95%CI:0.82-0.87)。霍恩平行分析显示,DLQI 存在单因素单维性。只有第 1 项符合 PCM 模型。包括第 9 项在内的其余项目由于回答重叠和顺序变化而没有显示出足够的拟合度:结论:基于 Rasch 分析的 DLQI-COL 的有效性被证明不适合用于评估皮肤病患者的 QoL。需要对该量表进行适当的跨文化调整和验证,以获得一个合适、可靠的量表版本,用于测量哥伦比亚皮肤病患者的 QOL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rasch Analysis Of The Dermatology Life Quality Index.

Background and aims: Previous results of the Dermatology-Life-Quality-Index (DLQI) validation in Colombia based on the classical test theory (CTT) perspective have showed the need to delve into its measurement properties. Therefore, we aimed to assess the structural validity, internal consistency and item response analysis of the DLQI through the item response theory (IRT) or the Rasch model.

Material and methods: We assessed the dimensionality of the DLQI, determined its difficulty, discrimination and differential functioning and went on to evaluate its internal consistency and discriminative validity among patients with inflammatory and non-inflammatory skin disease. We recruited Colombian patients with different skin diseases.

Results: Data of 865 patients (mean age, 49.3 years; 61% females) were included. DLQI-scores ranged from 0 up to 30. Internal consistency for dichotomous item #7 showed a McDonald's Omega coefficient of 0.85 (95%CI, 0.84-0.87) and a Cronbach's α coefficient of 0.86 (95%CI, 0.84-0.88). For ordinal item #7, the McDonald's Omega coefficient was 0.87 (95%IC:0.85-0.89) and Cronbach's α coefficient, 0.84 (95%CI, 0.82-0.87). Horn's parallel analysis revealed the presence of DLQI unidimensionality with a 1-factor solution. Only item #1 fitted the PCM model. The remaining items, including item #9, did not show adequate fit due to overlapping responses and order changes.

Conclusions: The validity of DLQI-COL based on Rasch analysis proved not to be a suitable instrument to evaluate QoL in our dermatologic population. A refined version of the scale with an adequate cross-cultural adaptation and validation process is needed to obtain an appropriate and reliable version of the instrument for QOL measuring in Colombian patients with skin diseases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.40%
发文量
473
审稿时长
56 weeks
期刊介绍: Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas, publicación Oficial de la Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología, es una revista de prestigio consolidado. Creada en 1909, es la revista mensual más antigua editada en España.En 2006 entró en Medline, y hoy resulta imprescindible para estar al día sobre la dermatología española y mundial.
期刊最新文献
[[Translated article]]Anonychia and Digital Deformity as a Presentation of Sarcoma with BCOR Genetic Alterations. [[Translated article]]Application of the Simplified Psoriasis Index in the Routine Clinical Practice: A Pilot Study. [[Translated article]]RF - Safety and Efficacy of Isotretinoin for Moderate-to-Severe Seborrheic Dermatitis. [[Translated article]]Trigeminal Trophic Syndrome: A Diagnosis to Be Kept in Mind. ¿Hacemos un párpado nuevo?: reconstrucción de defecto total de párpado inferior tras escisión de léntigo maligno melanoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1