Barbara Jeker, Laura Thalmann, Ulrike Bacher, Henning Nilius, Gaëlle Rhyner, Martin Sökler, Susanne Soltermann, Annette Winkler, Corinne Vorburger, Michael Daskalakis, Michèle Hoffmann, Thomas Pabst
{"title":"骨髓瘤患者干细胞动员与化疗和细胞因子(G-CSF)与单纯细胞因子的比较(MOCCCA):随机II期、开放标签、非劣效试验。","authors":"Barbara Jeker, Laura Thalmann, Ulrike Bacher, Henning Nilius, Gaëlle Rhyner, Martin Sökler, Susanne Soltermann, Annette Winkler, Corinne Vorburger, Michael Daskalakis, Michèle Hoffmann, Thomas Pabst","doi":"10.1038/s41409-024-02468-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In fit patients with newly diagnosed myeloma, high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is considered standard of care. For mobilization of CD34+ cells for ASCT, combined cytotoxic chemotherapy and G-CSF is commonly used. However, the importance of cytostatic chemotherapy for reliable mobilization remains unclear. This prospective randomized phase II non-inferiority trial compared G-GSF only (G) compared to standard chemotherapy/G-CSF (CG) for CD34+ mobilization. The primary endpoint was a less than 15% difference in successful stem cell collection ( ≥ 5.0 × 10<sup>6</sup> CD34+ cells/kg b.w. in a single day collection procedure without additional stimulation with plerixafor) with the G regimen. 136 patients were 1:1 randomized. With an 18% difference in favor of the CG therapy, the non-inferiority margin was not maintained (95% CI 1%, 34%, p = 0.04). The median total CD34+ yield was 9.99 × 10<sup>6</sup>/kg b.w. in CG patients and 7.42 × 10<sup>6</sup>/kg b.w. in patients with G-CSF alone (p < 0.001). Ultimately, 130 (96%) patients proceeded to HDCT with ASCT. There were no differences in adverse events, hematologic engraftment, quality of life, or pain perception between the groups. Our data indicate that G-CSF only is inferior to chemotherapy with G-CSF for peripheral CD34+ stem cell mobilization. Trial registration SNCTP #: SNCTP000002952; Trials.gov #: NCT03442673.</p>","PeriodicalId":9126,"journal":{"name":"Bone Marrow Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing stem cell mobilization with chemotherapy and cytokine (G-CSF) versus cytokine alone in myeloma patients (MOCCCA): a randomized phase II, open-label, non-inferiority trial.\",\"authors\":\"Barbara Jeker, Laura Thalmann, Ulrike Bacher, Henning Nilius, Gaëlle Rhyner, Martin Sökler, Susanne Soltermann, Annette Winkler, Corinne Vorburger, Michael Daskalakis, Michèle Hoffmann, Thomas Pabst\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41409-024-02468-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In fit patients with newly diagnosed myeloma, high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is considered standard of care. For mobilization of CD34+ cells for ASCT, combined cytotoxic chemotherapy and G-CSF is commonly used. However, the importance of cytostatic chemotherapy for reliable mobilization remains unclear. This prospective randomized phase II non-inferiority trial compared G-GSF only (G) compared to standard chemotherapy/G-CSF (CG) for CD34+ mobilization. The primary endpoint was a less than 15% difference in successful stem cell collection ( ≥ 5.0 × 10<sup>6</sup> CD34+ cells/kg b.w. in a single day collection procedure without additional stimulation with plerixafor) with the G regimen. 136 patients were 1:1 randomized. With an 18% difference in favor of the CG therapy, the non-inferiority margin was not maintained (95% CI 1%, 34%, p = 0.04). The median total CD34+ yield was 9.99 × 10<sup>6</sup>/kg b.w. in CG patients and 7.42 × 10<sup>6</sup>/kg b.w. in patients with G-CSF alone (p < 0.001). Ultimately, 130 (96%) patients proceeded to HDCT with ASCT. There were no differences in adverse events, hematologic engraftment, quality of life, or pain perception between the groups. Our data indicate that G-CSF only is inferior to chemotherapy with G-CSF for peripheral CD34+ stem cell mobilization. Trial registration SNCTP #: SNCTP000002952; Trials.gov #: NCT03442673.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone Marrow Transplantation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone Marrow Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-024-02468-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone Marrow Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-024-02468-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
对于新确诊的骨髓瘤患者,大剂量化疗(HDCT)后进行自体干细胞移植(ASCT)被认为是标准治疗方法。为自体干细胞移植动员CD34+细胞,通常采用细胞毒性化疗和G-CSF联合疗法。然而,细胞毒化疗对可靠动员的重要性仍不清楚。这项前瞻性随机II期非劣效试验比较了仅使用G-GSF(G)与标准化疗/G-CSF(CG)用于CD34+动员的效果。主要终点是G方案的干细胞成功采集率(单日采集过程中CD34+细胞≥5.0×106个/千克体重,无需额外使用普乐沙福刺激)差异小于15%。136名患者被1:1随机分组。CG疗法的差异为18%,非劣效边距未保持不变(95% CI 1%, 34%, p = 0.04)。CG 患者的 CD34+ 总产量中位数为 9.99 × 106/kg b.w.,而单独使用 G-CSF 的患者为 7.42 × 106/kg b.w.(P=0.05)。
Comparing stem cell mobilization with chemotherapy and cytokine (G-CSF) versus cytokine alone in myeloma patients (MOCCCA): a randomized phase II, open-label, non-inferiority trial.
In fit patients with newly diagnosed myeloma, high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is considered standard of care. For mobilization of CD34+ cells for ASCT, combined cytotoxic chemotherapy and G-CSF is commonly used. However, the importance of cytostatic chemotherapy for reliable mobilization remains unclear. This prospective randomized phase II non-inferiority trial compared G-GSF only (G) compared to standard chemotherapy/G-CSF (CG) for CD34+ mobilization. The primary endpoint was a less than 15% difference in successful stem cell collection ( ≥ 5.0 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg b.w. in a single day collection procedure without additional stimulation with plerixafor) with the G regimen. 136 patients were 1:1 randomized. With an 18% difference in favor of the CG therapy, the non-inferiority margin was not maintained (95% CI 1%, 34%, p = 0.04). The median total CD34+ yield was 9.99 × 106/kg b.w. in CG patients and 7.42 × 106/kg b.w. in patients with G-CSF alone (p < 0.001). Ultimately, 130 (96%) patients proceeded to HDCT with ASCT. There were no differences in adverse events, hematologic engraftment, quality of life, or pain perception between the groups. Our data indicate that G-CSF only is inferior to chemotherapy with G-CSF for peripheral CD34+ stem cell mobilization. Trial registration SNCTP #: SNCTP000002952; Trials.gov #: NCT03442673.
期刊介绍:
Bone Marrow Transplantation publishes high quality, peer reviewed original research that addresses all aspects of basic biology and clinical use of haemopoietic stem cell transplantation.
The broad scope of the journal thus encompasses topics such as stem cell biology, e.g., kinetics and cytokine control, transplantation immunology e.g., HLA and matching techniques, translational research, and clinical results of specific transplant protocols. Bone Marrow Transplantation publishes 24 issues a year.