Bone Marrow Transplantation最新文献

We aimed to prospectively explore the risk factors for measurable residual disease (MRD) positivity after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) in AML patients (n = 478). The cumulative incidences (CIs) of post-SCT MRD positivity at 100 days, 360 days and 3 years were 4.6%, 12.1% and 18.3%, respectively. Positive pre-SCT MRD and pre-SCT active disease were risk factors for post-SCT MRD positivity at both 360 days and 3 years (P < 0.001). European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2017 risk stratification was a risk factor for positive post-SCT MRD at 360 days (P = 0.044). A scoring system for predicting post-SCT MRD positivity at 360 days was established by using pre-SCT MRD, pre-SCT active disease and ELN 2017 risk stratification. The CI of positive post-SCT MRD at 3 years was 13.2%, 23.7%, and 43.9% for patients with scores of 0, 1, and 2, respectively (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the scoring system was associated with a higher CI of post-SCT MRD positivity, leukemia relapse and inferior survival. Our data indicate that positive pre-SCT MRD status, pre-SCT active disease, and ELN 2017 risk stratification are risk factors for positive post-SCT MRD status in AML patients.

In fit patients with newly diagnosed myeloma, high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is considered standard of care. For mobilization of CD34+ cells for ASCT, combined cytotoxic chemotherapy and G-CSF is commonly used. However, the importance of cytostatic chemotherapy for reliable mobilization remains unclear. This prospective randomized phase II non-inferiority trial compared G-GSF only (G) compared to standard chemotherapy/G-CSF (CG) for CD34+ mobilization. The primary endpoint was a less than 15% difference in successful stem cell collection ( ≥ 5.0 × 10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg b.w. in a single day collection procedure without additional stimulation with plerixafor) with the G regimen. 136 patients were 1:1 randomized. With an 18% difference in favor of the CG therapy, the non-inferiority margin was not maintained (95% CI 1%, 34%, p = 0.04). The median total CD34+ yield was 9.99 × 10⁶/kg b.w. in CG patients and 7.42 × 10⁶/kg b.w. in patients with G-CSF alone (p < 0.001). Ultimately, 130 (96%) patients proceeded to HDCT with ASCT. There were no differences in adverse events, hematologic engraftment, quality of life, or pain perception between the groups. Our data indicate that G-CSF only is inferior to chemotherapy with G-CSF for peripheral CD34+ stem cell mobilization. Trial registration SNCTP #: SNCTP000002952; Trials.gov #: NCT03442673.

NPM1 mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) comprises roughly 30% of all AML cases and is mainly classified as favorable or intermediate-risk according to the European Leukemia Net stratification. Some patients, however, either have a poor response to initial intensive chemotherapy or ultimately relapse. NPM1 mutations are common, generally stable at early relapse and AML specific, features which make them ideal targets for measurable residual disease (MRD) monitoring. MRD monitoring via molecular analysis during the course of treatment can inform the role of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HCT) in first remission in patients with NPM1 mutated AML with high-risk co-occurring mutations, particularly FLT3-ITD, and in favorable risk patients who do not achieve defined molecular milestones. In this review, we evaluate the prognostic role of MRD monitoring in NPM1 mutated AML and its use as a predictive biomarker to refine risk stratification and inform decision making regarding treatment. We explore the impact of pre-HCT MRD positivity on post-HCT outcomes in this AML subset, and how HCT-related factors such as conditioning intensity may influence this risk.

Several CD19 CAR-T-cell drugs are approved for safety and efficacy in advanced B-cell cancers with encouraging results. However, primary refractory and relapse are common. We critically analyze long-term data on efficacy of CD19 CAR-T-cell therapies in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas from clinical trials with those of so-called real world data. We identify co-variates associated with efficacy, discuss mechanisms of relapse, summarize the data on the results of post-failure therapy including allotransplants, monoclonal and bi-specific antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, immune checkpoint-inhibitors and repeat infusions of CAR-T-cells. We conclude, save for allotransplants, there are few data strongly supporting any of these interventions. Most trial are with few heterogeneously-treated subjects with diverse interventions and brief follow-up. Interventions need to be tailored to the cause(s) of CAR-T-cell failure. Prestly, there is not a convincingly safe and effective therapy of people failing initial CAR-T-cell therapy of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.