缝合增量对尺侧副韧带重建稳定性和强度的影响:锚法和骨隧道法

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Science Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1016/j.jos.2024.10.014
Kenta Inagaki, Nobuyasu Ochiai, Eiko Hashimoto, Yu Hiraoka, Fumiya Hattori, Seiji Ohtori
{"title":"缝合增量对尺侧副韧带重建稳定性和强度的影响:锚法和骨隧道法","authors":"Kenta Inagaki, Nobuyasu Ochiai, Eiko Hashimoto, Yu Hiraoka, Fumiya Hattori, Seiji Ohtori","doi":"10.1016/j.jos.2024.10.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The initial fixation strength of the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction is increased by combining a suture augmentation (SA). However, no reports have investigated the stability of UCL reconstruction with SA across multiple elbow flexion angles and the influence of SA on the stability and failure strength of the anchor and bone tunnel methods. This study aimed to compare the displacement against a valgus load at multiple elbow flexion angles of the anchor and bone tunnel methods between with and without SA, and to compare the failure strength between these methods with SA. We hypothesized that the combination of SA reduced the displacement, and the failure strength was comparable between the anchor and Ito methods with SA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremities were used. To evaluate the displacement against valgus load, the valgus stability tests at multiple flexion angles were performed for four UCL reconstruction methods: anchor method, anchor with SA, bone tunnel, and bone tunnel with SA. The load-to-failure test was performed to evaluate the failure strength of the anchor and bone tunnel methods with SA. P < 0.05 was considered significant in tests of statistical inference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The displacements of the anchor method with SA at 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion were significantly smaller than those without SA. Regarding comparing the bone tunnel method with and without SA, a significant difference was observed at only 30° of flexion. There was no significant difference in the failure strength between the anchor and bone tunnel methods with SA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of SA reduced the displacement against a valgus load at multiple flexion angles, and the failure strength was comparable between the anchor and bone tunnel methods with SA. Combining SA may increase the initial fixation strength in both the anchor and bone tunnel methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":16939,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of the suture augmentation on the stability and strength of ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction: The anchor and bone tunnel methods.\",\"authors\":\"Kenta Inagaki, Nobuyasu Ochiai, Eiko Hashimoto, Yu Hiraoka, Fumiya Hattori, Seiji Ohtori\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jos.2024.10.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The initial fixation strength of the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction is increased by combining a suture augmentation (SA). However, no reports have investigated the stability of UCL reconstruction with SA across multiple elbow flexion angles and the influence of SA on the stability and failure strength of the anchor and bone tunnel methods. This study aimed to compare the displacement against a valgus load at multiple elbow flexion angles of the anchor and bone tunnel methods between with and without SA, and to compare the failure strength between these methods with SA. We hypothesized that the combination of SA reduced the displacement, and the failure strength was comparable between the anchor and Ito methods with SA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremities were used. To evaluate the displacement against valgus load, the valgus stability tests at multiple flexion angles were performed for four UCL reconstruction methods: anchor method, anchor with SA, bone tunnel, and bone tunnel with SA. The load-to-failure test was performed to evaluate the failure strength of the anchor and bone tunnel methods with SA. P < 0.05 was considered significant in tests of statistical inference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The displacements of the anchor method with SA at 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion were significantly smaller than those without SA. Regarding comparing the bone tunnel method with and without SA, a significant difference was observed at only 30° of flexion. There was no significant difference in the failure strength between the anchor and bone tunnel methods with SA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of SA reduced the displacement against a valgus load at multiple flexion angles, and the failure strength was comparable between the anchor and bone tunnel methods with SA. Combining SA may increase the initial fixation strength in both the anchor and bone tunnel methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2024.10.014\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2024.10.014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:结合缝合增强(SA)可提高尺侧副韧带(UCL)重建的初始固定强度。然而,目前还没有报告研究了在多个肘关节屈曲角度下使用 SA 重建尺桡侧韧带的稳定性,以及 SA 对锚和骨隧道方法的稳定性和破坏强度的影响。本研究旨在比较有无 SA 的锚和骨隧道方法在多个肘关节屈曲角度下承受外翻负荷时的位移,并比较有 SA 的这些方法的破坏强度。我们假设结合使用 SA 可以减少位移,而使用 SA 的锚定法和伊藤法的破坏强度相当:方法:使用八只新鲜冷冻的尸体上肢。为了评估外翻载荷下的位移,对四种 UCL 重建方法进行了多个屈曲角度的外翻稳定性测试,这四种方法分别是:锚固法、带 SA 的锚固法、骨隧道和带 SA 的骨隧道。为了评估锚定法和带 SA 的骨隧道法的失效强度,还进行了载荷-失效试验。P 结果:带有 SA 的锚固法在屈曲 30°、60° 和 90°时的位移明显小于不带 SA 的锚固法。在比较有无 SA 的骨隧道方法时,仅在屈曲 30°时观察到显著差异。结论:结论:在多个屈曲角度下,SA组合降低了外翻载荷下的位移,有SA的锚固法和骨隧道法的破坏强度相当。在锚固法和骨隧道法中,结合使用 SA 可提高初始固定强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of the suture augmentation on the stability and strength of ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction: The anchor and bone tunnel methods.

Background: The initial fixation strength of the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction is increased by combining a suture augmentation (SA). However, no reports have investigated the stability of UCL reconstruction with SA across multiple elbow flexion angles and the influence of SA on the stability and failure strength of the anchor and bone tunnel methods. This study aimed to compare the displacement against a valgus load at multiple elbow flexion angles of the anchor and bone tunnel methods between with and without SA, and to compare the failure strength between these methods with SA. We hypothesized that the combination of SA reduced the displacement, and the failure strength was comparable between the anchor and Ito methods with SA.

Methods: Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremities were used. To evaluate the displacement against valgus load, the valgus stability tests at multiple flexion angles were performed for four UCL reconstruction methods: anchor method, anchor with SA, bone tunnel, and bone tunnel with SA. The load-to-failure test was performed to evaluate the failure strength of the anchor and bone tunnel methods with SA. P < 0.05 was considered significant in tests of statistical inference.

Results: The displacements of the anchor method with SA at 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion were significantly smaller than those without SA. Regarding comparing the bone tunnel method with and without SA, a significant difference was observed at only 30° of flexion. There was no significant difference in the failure strength between the anchor and bone tunnel methods with SA.

Conclusion: The combination of SA reduced the displacement against a valgus load at multiple flexion angles, and the failure strength was comparable between the anchor and bone tunnel methods with SA. Combining SA may increase the initial fixation strength in both the anchor and bone tunnel methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Science
Journal of Orthopaedic Science 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Science is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. The journal publishes the latest researches and topical debates in all fields of clinical and experimental orthopaedics, including musculoskeletal medicine, sports medicine, locomotive syndrome, trauma, paediatrics, oncology and biomaterials, as well as basic researches.
期刊最新文献
Clinical characteristics and results after conservative treatment or interfascicular neurolysis of 100 limbs with spontaneous anterior interosseous nerve palsy: A prospective Japanese multicenter study. Minimal clinically important difference in the Japanese Orthopedic Association Score and shoulder 36 after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in a Japanese population: A retrospective cohort study. What is the appropriate revascularisation approach in traumatic popliteal artery injury? Platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of delayed union and nonunion fractures: An umbrella meta-analysis. Analysis of cancer multigene panel testing for osteosarcoma in pediatric and adults using the center for cancer genomics and advanced therapeutics database in Japan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1