Catherine S Smith, Nicole L Henderson, Emma K Hendrix, Tanvi Padalkar, Chao-Hui Sylvia Huang, D'Ambra N Dent, Stacey A Ingram, Chelsea McGowan, J Nicholas Odom, Tara Kaufmann, Bryan Weiner, Doris Howell, Angela M Stover, Ethan Basch, Jennifer Young Pierce, Gabrielle B Rocque
{"title":"患者对癌症治疗期间标准护理远程症状监测的益处和局限性的看法。","authors":"Catherine S Smith, Nicole L Henderson, Emma K Hendrix, Tanvi Padalkar, Chao-Hui Sylvia Huang, D'Ambra N Dent, Stacey A Ingram, Chelsea McGowan, J Nicholas Odom, Tara Kaufmann, Bryan Weiner, Doris Howell, Angela M Stover, Ethan Basch, Jennifer Young Pierce, Gabrielle B Rocque","doi":"10.1177/10732748241297368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Remote symptom monitoring (RSM) allows patients to electronically self-report symptoms to their healthcare team for individual management. Clinical trials have demonstrated overarching benefits; however, little is known regarding patient-perceived benefits and limitations of RSM programs used during patient care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective qualitative study from December 2021 to May 2023 included patients with cancer participating in standard-of-care RSM at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) in Birmingham, AL, and the Univeristy of South Alabama (USA) Health Mitchell Cancer Institute (MCI) in Mobile, AL. Semi-structured interviews focused on patient experiences with and perceptions surrounding RSM participation. Interviews occurred over the phone, via digital videoconference, or in person, at the convenience of the patient. Grounded theory was used to conduct content coding and identify recurring themes and exemplary quotes using NVivo.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty patients (20 UAB, 20 MCI) were interviewed. Participants were predominately female (87.5%), aged 41-65 (50%), and married (57.5%). Data is consistent with local demographics, comprising mainly White (72.5%) and 27.5% Black individuals. Three main themes emerged regarding perceived benefits of RSM: (1) <i>Facilitation of Proactive</i> <i>Management</i>, identifying the patient's needs and intervening earlier to alleviate symptom burden; (2) <i>Promotion of Symptom Self-Management</i>, providing patients autonomy in their cancer care; and (3) <i>Improvement in Patient-Healthcare Provider Relationships</i>, fostering genuine connections based on healthcare team's responses. However, participants also noted <i>Perceived Limitations of RSM</i>; particularly when support of symptom management was unnecessary, ineffective, or felt impersonal.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study focused on patient experiences when utilizing a RSM program while undergoing treatment for cancer and found benefits to its implementation that extended beyond symptom management. At the same time, patients noted drawbacks experienced during RSM, which can help with future tailoring of RSM programs. Patient perceptions should be regularly assessed and highlighted for successful and sustained implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49093,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Control","volume":"31 ","pages":"10732748241297368"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569491/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient-Perceived Benefits and Limitations of Standard of Care Remote Symptom Monitoring During Cancer Treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Catherine S Smith, Nicole L Henderson, Emma K Hendrix, Tanvi Padalkar, Chao-Hui Sylvia Huang, D'Ambra N Dent, Stacey A Ingram, Chelsea McGowan, J Nicholas Odom, Tara Kaufmann, Bryan Weiner, Doris Howell, Angela M Stover, Ethan Basch, Jennifer Young Pierce, Gabrielle B Rocque\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10732748241297368\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Remote symptom monitoring (RSM) allows patients to electronically self-report symptoms to their healthcare team for individual management. Clinical trials have demonstrated overarching benefits; however, little is known regarding patient-perceived benefits and limitations of RSM programs used during patient care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective qualitative study from December 2021 to May 2023 included patients with cancer participating in standard-of-care RSM at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) in Birmingham, AL, and the Univeristy of South Alabama (USA) Health Mitchell Cancer Institute (MCI) in Mobile, AL. Semi-structured interviews focused on patient experiences with and perceptions surrounding RSM participation. Interviews occurred over the phone, via digital videoconference, or in person, at the convenience of the patient. Grounded theory was used to conduct content coding and identify recurring themes and exemplary quotes using NVivo.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty patients (20 UAB, 20 MCI) were interviewed. Participants were predominately female (87.5%), aged 41-65 (50%), and married (57.5%). Data is consistent with local demographics, comprising mainly White (72.5%) and 27.5% Black individuals. Three main themes emerged regarding perceived benefits of RSM: (1) <i>Facilitation of Proactive</i> <i>Management</i>, identifying the patient's needs and intervening earlier to alleviate symptom burden; (2) <i>Promotion of Symptom Self-Management</i>, providing patients autonomy in their cancer care; and (3) <i>Improvement in Patient-Healthcare Provider Relationships</i>, fostering genuine connections based on healthcare team's responses. However, participants also noted <i>Perceived Limitations of RSM</i>; particularly when support of symptom management was unnecessary, ineffective, or felt impersonal.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study focused on patient experiences when utilizing a RSM program while undergoing treatment for cancer and found benefits to its implementation that extended beyond symptom management. At the same time, patients noted drawbacks experienced during RSM, which can help with future tailoring of RSM programs. Patient perceptions should be regularly assessed and highlighted for successful and sustained implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Control\",\"volume\":\"31 \",\"pages\":\"10732748241297368\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569491/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748241297368\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748241297368","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Patient-Perceived Benefits and Limitations of Standard of Care Remote Symptom Monitoring During Cancer Treatment.
Introduction: Remote symptom monitoring (RSM) allows patients to electronically self-report symptoms to their healthcare team for individual management. Clinical trials have demonstrated overarching benefits; however, little is known regarding patient-perceived benefits and limitations of RSM programs used during patient care.
Methods: This prospective qualitative study from December 2021 to May 2023 included patients with cancer participating in standard-of-care RSM at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) in Birmingham, AL, and the Univeristy of South Alabama (USA) Health Mitchell Cancer Institute (MCI) in Mobile, AL. Semi-structured interviews focused on patient experiences with and perceptions surrounding RSM participation. Interviews occurred over the phone, via digital videoconference, or in person, at the convenience of the patient. Grounded theory was used to conduct content coding and identify recurring themes and exemplary quotes using NVivo.
Results: Forty patients (20 UAB, 20 MCI) were interviewed. Participants were predominately female (87.5%), aged 41-65 (50%), and married (57.5%). Data is consistent with local demographics, comprising mainly White (72.5%) and 27.5% Black individuals. Three main themes emerged regarding perceived benefits of RSM: (1) Facilitation of ProactiveManagement, identifying the patient's needs and intervening earlier to alleviate symptom burden; (2) Promotion of Symptom Self-Management, providing patients autonomy in their cancer care; and (3) Improvement in Patient-Healthcare Provider Relationships, fostering genuine connections based on healthcare team's responses. However, participants also noted Perceived Limitations of RSM; particularly when support of symptom management was unnecessary, ineffective, or felt impersonal.
Conclusion: This study focused on patient experiences when utilizing a RSM program while undergoing treatment for cancer and found benefits to its implementation that extended beyond symptom management. At the same time, patients noted drawbacks experienced during RSM, which can help with future tailoring of RSM programs. Patient perceptions should be regularly assessed and highlighted for successful and sustained implementation.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Control is a JCR-ranked, peer-reviewed open access journal whose mission is to advance the prevention, detection, diagnosis, treatment, and palliative care of cancer by enabling researchers, doctors, policymakers, and other healthcare professionals to freely share research along the cancer control continuum. Our vision is a world where gold-standard cancer care is the norm, not the exception.