利用智能眼镜进行印象记录远程培训的教育效果。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Dental Education Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1002/jdd.13785
Ayako Sekiguchi, Ridan Cao, Sachi Umemori, Kanako Noritake, Masayo Sunaga, Atsuhiro Kinoshita, Ken-Ichi Tonami, Hiroshi Nitta
{"title":"利用智能眼镜进行印象记录远程培训的教育效果。","authors":"Ayako Sekiguchi, Ridan Cao, Sachi Umemori, Kanako Noritake, Masayo Sunaga, Atsuhiro Kinoshita, Ken-Ichi Tonami, Hiroshi Nitta","doi":"10.1002/jdd.13785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the educational outcomes of remote instruction (RI) in impression-taking using smart glasses with those of face-to-face instruction (FI) and paper-based self-learning (SL) and analyze the educational effects, aiming to develop a remote clinical training strategy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were recruited from among the dental residents who were trained in the first-year clinical program at the university hospital in 2023. The participants were divided into three groups as the original skill level was equal, and the groups were assigned RI, FI, printed guidance, and SL. All the participants took impressions of the jaw models attached to the mannequin using alginate impression material. Next, assigned instructions were provided. Then again, the trainees took impressions of the jaw models. The pre- and postinstruction impressions of each participant were evaluated, and the change in the impression score was statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pre- and postinstruction scores of the trainees in the RI and FI groups showed a significant increase (p < 0.05), whereas no significant difference was observed in the score changes in the SL group. In the intergroup comparisons, the score changes of the RI and FI groups were greater than those of the SL group, although no significant difference was found between the score changes of the RI and FI groups (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RI in impression-taking using smart glasses has a greater educational effectiveness than paper-based SL. It has also been suggested that RI can have educational efficacy similar to FI.</p>","PeriodicalId":50216,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Educational effectiveness of remote training with smart glasses for impression-taking.\",\"authors\":\"Ayako Sekiguchi, Ridan Cao, Sachi Umemori, Kanako Noritake, Masayo Sunaga, Atsuhiro Kinoshita, Ken-Ichi Tonami, Hiroshi Nitta\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jdd.13785\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the educational outcomes of remote instruction (RI) in impression-taking using smart glasses with those of face-to-face instruction (FI) and paper-based self-learning (SL) and analyze the educational effects, aiming to develop a remote clinical training strategy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were recruited from among the dental residents who were trained in the first-year clinical program at the university hospital in 2023. The participants were divided into three groups as the original skill level was equal, and the groups were assigned RI, FI, printed guidance, and SL. All the participants took impressions of the jaw models attached to the mannequin using alginate impression material. Next, assigned instructions were provided. Then again, the trainees took impressions of the jaw models. The pre- and postinstruction impressions of each participant were evaluated, and the change in the impression score was statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pre- and postinstruction scores of the trainees in the RI and FI groups showed a significant increase (p < 0.05), whereas no significant difference was observed in the score changes in the SL group. In the intergroup comparisons, the score changes of the RI and FI groups were greater than those of the SL group, although no significant difference was found between the score changes of the RI and FI groups (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RI in impression-taking using smart glasses has a greater educational effectiveness than paper-based SL. It has also been suggested that RI can have educational efficacy similar to FI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dental Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dental Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.13785\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.13785","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较使用智能眼镜进行取印模远程教学(RI)与面对面教学(FI)和纸质自学(SL)的教学成果,并分析其教学效果,旨在开发一种远程临床培训策略:从2023年在大学医院接受一年级临床课程培训的牙科住院医师中招募参与者。由于原始技能水平相同,参与者被分为三组,并被分配为RI组、FI组、打印指导组和SL组。所有参与者都使用藻酸盐印模材料对附着在人体模型上的下颌模型进行印模。接着,提供指定的指导。然后,学员们再次对颌骨模型取模。对每位学员的教学前后印模进行评估,并对印模得分的变化进行统计分析:结果:RI 组和 FI 组学员在教学前和教学后的印象分均有显著提高(P使用智能眼镜进行印象测量的 RI 比纸质 SL 的教育效果更好。也有人认为,RI 的教育效果与 FI 相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Educational effectiveness of remote training with smart glasses for impression-taking.

Purpose: To compare the educational outcomes of remote instruction (RI) in impression-taking using smart glasses with those of face-to-face instruction (FI) and paper-based self-learning (SL) and analyze the educational effects, aiming to develop a remote clinical training strategy.

Methods: Participants were recruited from among the dental residents who were trained in the first-year clinical program at the university hospital in 2023. The participants were divided into three groups as the original skill level was equal, and the groups were assigned RI, FI, printed guidance, and SL. All the participants took impressions of the jaw models attached to the mannequin using alginate impression material. Next, assigned instructions were provided. Then again, the trainees took impressions of the jaw models. The pre- and postinstruction impressions of each participant were evaluated, and the change in the impression score was statistically analyzed.

Results: The pre- and postinstruction scores of the trainees in the RI and FI groups showed a significant increase (p < 0.05), whereas no significant difference was observed in the score changes in the SL group. In the intergroup comparisons, the score changes of the RI and FI groups were greater than those of the SL group, although no significant difference was found between the score changes of the RI and FI groups (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: RI in impression-taking using smart glasses has a greater educational effectiveness than paper-based SL. It has also been suggested that RI can have educational efficacy similar to FI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Dental Education
Journal of Dental Education 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
21.70%
发文量
274
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dental Education (JDE) is a peer-reviewed monthly journal that publishes a wide variety of educational and scientific research in dental, allied dental and advanced dental education. Published continuously by the American Dental Education Association since 1936 and internationally recognized as the premier journal for academic dentistry, the JDE publishes articles on such topics as curriculum reform, education research methods, innovative educational and assessment methodologies, faculty development, community-based dental education, student recruitment and admissions, professional and educational ethics, dental education around the world and systematic reviews of educational interest. The JDE is one of the top scholarly journals publishing the most important work in oral health education today; it celebrated its 80th anniversary in 2016.
期刊最新文献
Integrating Generative AI in Case-Based Collaborative Learning: Student's Perceptions. Interventions to Reduce Food and Nutrition Insecurity Among Dental Students. Assessing AI-Enhanced Learning in Bone Loss Detection among Dental Students. A Pilot Study: Evaluating Disposable Syringes Compared to Non-Disposable Syringes for Dental Training. Innovative Tobacco Cessation Strategies in Dental Education: Bridging Didactic and Clinical.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1