{"title":"利用智能眼镜进行印象记录远程培训的教育效果。","authors":"Ayako Sekiguchi, Ridan Cao, Sachi Umemori, Kanako Noritake, Masayo Sunaga, Atsuhiro Kinoshita, Ken-Ichi Tonami, Hiroshi Nitta","doi":"10.1002/jdd.13785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the educational outcomes of remote instruction (RI) in impression-taking using smart glasses with those of face-to-face instruction (FI) and paper-based self-learning (SL) and analyze the educational effects, aiming to develop a remote clinical training strategy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were recruited from among the dental residents who were trained in the first-year clinical program at the university hospital in 2023. The participants were divided into three groups as the original skill level was equal, and the groups were assigned RI, FI, printed guidance, and SL. All the participants took impressions of the jaw models attached to the mannequin using alginate impression material. Next, assigned instructions were provided. Then again, the trainees took impressions of the jaw models. The pre- and postinstruction impressions of each participant were evaluated, and the change in the impression score was statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pre- and postinstruction scores of the trainees in the RI and FI groups showed a significant increase (p < 0.05), whereas no significant difference was observed in the score changes in the SL group. In the intergroup comparisons, the score changes of the RI and FI groups were greater than those of the SL group, although no significant difference was found between the score changes of the RI and FI groups (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RI in impression-taking using smart glasses has a greater educational effectiveness than paper-based SL. It has also been suggested that RI can have educational efficacy similar to FI.</p>","PeriodicalId":50216,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Educational effectiveness of remote training with smart glasses for impression-taking.\",\"authors\":\"Ayako Sekiguchi, Ridan Cao, Sachi Umemori, Kanako Noritake, Masayo Sunaga, Atsuhiro Kinoshita, Ken-Ichi Tonami, Hiroshi Nitta\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jdd.13785\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the educational outcomes of remote instruction (RI) in impression-taking using smart glasses with those of face-to-face instruction (FI) and paper-based self-learning (SL) and analyze the educational effects, aiming to develop a remote clinical training strategy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were recruited from among the dental residents who were trained in the first-year clinical program at the university hospital in 2023. The participants were divided into three groups as the original skill level was equal, and the groups were assigned RI, FI, printed guidance, and SL. All the participants took impressions of the jaw models attached to the mannequin using alginate impression material. Next, assigned instructions were provided. Then again, the trainees took impressions of the jaw models. The pre- and postinstruction impressions of each participant were evaluated, and the change in the impression score was statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pre- and postinstruction scores of the trainees in the RI and FI groups showed a significant increase (p < 0.05), whereas no significant difference was observed in the score changes in the SL group. In the intergroup comparisons, the score changes of the RI and FI groups were greater than those of the SL group, although no significant difference was found between the score changes of the RI and FI groups (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RI in impression-taking using smart glasses has a greater educational effectiveness than paper-based SL. It has also been suggested that RI can have educational efficacy similar to FI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dental Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dental Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.13785\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.13785","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:比较使用智能眼镜进行取印模远程教学(RI)与面对面教学(FI)和纸质自学(SL)的教学成果,并分析其教学效果,旨在开发一种远程临床培训策略:从2023年在大学医院接受一年级临床课程培训的牙科住院医师中招募参与者。由于原始技能水平相同,参与者被分为三组,并被分配为RI组、FI组、打印指导组和SL组。所有参与者都使用藻酸盐印模材料对附着在人体模型上的下颌模型进行印模。接着,提供指定的指导。然后,学员们再次对颌骨模型取模。对每位学员的教学前后印模进行评估,并对印模得分的变化进行统计分析:结果:RI 组和 FI 组学员在教学前和教学后的印象分均有显著提高(P使用智能眼镜进行印象测量的 RI 比纸质 SL 的教育效果更好。也有人认为,RI 的教育效果与 FI 相似。
Educational effectiveness of remote training with smart glasses for impression-taking.
Purpose: To compare the educational outcomes of remote instruction (RI) in impression-taking using smart glasses with those of face-to-face instruction (FI) and paper-based self-learning (SL) and analyze the educational effects, aiming to develop a remote clinical training strategy.
Methods: Participants were recruited from among the dental residents who were trained in the first-year clinical program at the university hospital in 2023. The participants were divided into three groups as the original skill level was equal, and the groups were assigned RI, FI, printed guidance, and SL. All the participants took impressions of the jaw models attached to the mannequin using alginate impression material. Next, assigned instructions were provided. Then again, the trainees took impressions of the jaw models. The pre- and postinstruction impressions of each participant were evaluated, and the change in the impression score was statistically analyzed.
Results: The pre- and postinstruction scores of the trainees in the RI and FI groups showed a significant increase (p < 0.05), whereas no significant difference was observed in the score changes in the SL group. In the intergroup comparisons, the score changes of the RI and FI groups were greater than those of the SL group, although no significant difference was found between the score changes of the RI and FI groups (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: RI in impression-taking using smart glasses has a greater educational effectiveness than paper-based SL. It has also been suggested that RI can have educational efficacy similar to FI.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Dental Education (JDE) is a peer-reviewed monthly journal that publishes a wide variety of educational and scientific research in dental, allied dental and advanced dental education. Published continuously by the American Dental Education Association since 1936 and internationally recognized as the premier journal for academic dentistry, the JDE publishes articles on such topics as curriculum reform, education research methods, innovative educational and assessment methodologies, faculty development, community-based dental education, student recruitment and admissions, professional and educational ethics, dental education around the world and systematic reviews of educational interest. The JDE is one of the top scholarly journals publishing the most important work in oral health education today; it celebrated its 80th anniversary in 2016.