巢穴的可利用性对雄性-雄性竞争的影响以及蛛形纲独享父性照料的觅卵成本

IF 1.3 4区 生物学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Ethology Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1111/eth.13511
Laís A. Grossel, Rachel M. Werneck, Glauco Machado
{"title":"巢穴的可利用性对雄性-雄性竞争的影响以及蛛形纲独享父性照料的觅卵成本","authors":"Laís A. Grossel,&nbsp;Rachel M. Werneck,&nbsp;Glauco Machado","doi":"10.1111/eth.13511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Natural cavities are monopolizable resources used as nest sites across many species exhibiting exclusive male care. However, our understanding of how the availability of this type of reproductive site influences male–male competition and the foraging costs associated with parental care is limited and based on studies of fish. The harvestman <i>Magnispina neptunus</i> offers the opportunity to explore these questions in invertebrates because males defend natural cavities used as oviposition sites and provide exclusive parental care. We hypothesized that low nest availability would increase male–male competition and the foraging costs of egg attendance. To test this hypothesis, we collected observational data in the field and conducted a laboratory experiment with two groups, low and high nest availability. Field data indicate natural cavity scarcity, as only 50% of the males were nest holders. Larger males were more likely to hold nests in the field, but body size did not predict nest ownership in the laboratory. In the field, nests with openings smaller than average were equally occupied by small and large males, while nests with openings larger than average were occupied almost exclusively by large males. The nest opening in the laboratory experiment was adjusted to be equal to the average found in the field, which may have increased nest defensibility, regardless of male size. Thus, prior residency may outweigh body size in determining nest possession. Because nest owners seem to have an advantage over intruders, the costs of abandoning a nest are likely high. This may explain why the frequency of nest takeovers and foraging outside the nests did not differ between experimental groups. In conclusion, although underexplored in empirical studies, external factors, such as the opening size of cavities defended by males of many species with resource-defense mating systems, may play a key role in the defensibility of nest sites.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50494,"journal":{"name":"Ethology","volume":"130 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Nest-Site Availability on Male–Male Competition and the Foraging Costs of Egg Attendance in an Arachnid With Exclusive Paternal Care\",\"authors\":\"Laís A. Grossel,&nbsp;Rachel M. Werneck,&nbsp;Glauco Machado\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/eth.13511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Natural cavities are monopolizable resources used as nest sites across many species exhibiting exclusive male care. However, our understanding of how the availability of this type of reproductive site influences male–male competition and the foraging costs associated with parental care is limited and based on studies of fish. The harvestman <i>Magnispina neptunus</i> offers the opportunity to explore these questions in invertebrates because males defend natural cavities used as oviposition sites and provide exclusive parental care. We hypothesized that low nest availability would increase male–male competition and the foraging costs of egg attendance. To test this hypothesis, we collected observational data in the field and conducted a laboratory experiment with two groups, low and high nest availability. Field data indicate natural cavity scarcity, as only 50% of the males were nest holders. Larger males were more likely to hold nests in the field, but body size did not predict nest ownership in the laboratory. In the field, nests with openings smaller than average were equally occupied by small and large males, while nests with openings larger than average were occupied almost exclusively by large males. The nest opening in the laboratory experiment was adjusted to be equal to the average found in the field, which may have increased nest defensibility, regardless of male size. Thus, prior residency may outweigh body size in determining nest possession. Because nest owners seem to have an advantage over intruders, the costs of abandoning a nest are likely high. This may explain why the frequency of nest takeovers and foraging outside the nests did not differ between experimental groups. In conclusion, although underexplored in empirical studies, external factors, such as the opening size of cavities defended by males of many species with resource-defense mating systems, may play a key role in the defensibility of nest sites.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethology\",\"volume\":\"130 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eth.13511\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eth.13511","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

天然洞穴是一种可垄断的资源,在许多物种中被用作巢穴,表现出专由雄性照料的特点。然而,我们对这种生殖场所的可用性如何影响雄性之间的竞争以及与父母照料相关的觅食成本的了解是有限的,而且是基于对鱼类的研究。由于雄性动物会保护作为产卵地点的天然洞穴,并提供专有的亲代照料,因此采食者Magnispina neptunus为在无脊椎动物中探讨这些问题提供了机会。我们假设,巢的可用性低会加剧雄性之间的竞争,增加产卵的觅食成本。为了验证这一假设,我们在野外收集了观察数据,并在实验室进行了巢穴可用性低和巢穴可用性高两组实验。野外数据表明自然巢穴稀缺,因为只有50%的雄性是巢的持有者。在野外,体型较大的雄性更有可能筑巢,但在实验室中,体型大小并不能预测巢的拥有情况。在野外,巢口小于平均值的巢被大小雄性平均占有,而巢口大于平均值的巢几乎只被大雄性占有。在实验室实验中,巢的开口被调整到与野外发现的平均值相等,这可能会增加巢的可防御性,而与雄性的大小无关。因此,在决定是否拥有巢时,先前的居住地可能比体型更重要。由于巢的拥有者似乎比入侵者更有优势,因此放弃巢的成本可能很高。这也许可以解释为什么不同实验组之间在巢外占巢和觅食的频率没有差异。总之,尽管在实证研究中探索不足,但外部因素,如许多具有资源防御交配系统的物种的雄性所防御的洞穴的开口大小,可能对巢穴的可防御性起着关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of Nest-Site Availability on Male–Male Competition and the Foraging Costs of Egg Attendance in an Arachnid With Exclusive Paternal Care

Natural cavities are monopolizable resources used as nest sites across many species exhibiting exclusive male care. However, our understanding of how the availability of this type of reproductive site influences male–male competition and the foraging costs associated with parental care is limited and based on studies of fish. The harvestman Magnispina neptunus offers the opportunity to explore these questions in invertebrates because males defend natural cavities used as oviposition sites and provide exclusive parental care. We hypothesized that low nest availability would increase male–male competition and the foraging costs of egg attendance. To test this hypothesis, we collected observational data in the field and conducted a laboratory experiment with two groups, low and high nest availability. Field data indicate natural cavity scarcity, as only 50% of the males were nest holders. Larger males were more likely to hold nests in the field, but body size did not predict nest ownership in the laboratory. In the field, nests with openings smaller than average were equally occupied by small and large males, while nests with openings larger than average were occupied almost exclusively by large males. The nest opening in the laboratory experiment was adjusted to be equal to the average found in the field, which may have increased nest defensibility, regardless of male size. Thus, prior residency may outweigh body size in determining nest possession. Because nest owners seem to have an advantage over intruders, the costs of abandoning a nest are likely high. This may explain why the frequency of nest takeovers and foraging outside the nests did not differ between experimental groups. In conclusion, although underexplored in empirical studies, external factors, such as the opening size of cavities defended by males of many species with resource-defense mating systems, may play a key role in the defensibility of nest sites.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ethology
Ethology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
89
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International in scope, Ethology publishes original research on behaviour including physiological mechanisms, function, and evolution. The Journal addresses behaviour in all species, from slime moulds to humans. Experimental research is preferred, both from the field and the lab, which is grounded in a theoretical framework. The section ''Perspectives and Current Debates'' provides an overview of the field and may include theoretical investigations and essays on controversial topics.
期刊最新文献
Cover Image Issue Information A Butterfly's Flash Coloration Distracts Predators—Read Future Textbook Knowledge in Ethology Call for Your Life: Acoustic Structure and Age-Sex Differences in Distress Calls of Red-Necked Nightjars The Relevance of Flash Coloration Against Avian Predation in a Morpho Butterfly: A Field Experiment in a Tropical Rainforest
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1