锂离子电池用铝负极材料结构相关电化学性质的比较研究

IF 1.9 4区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY ChemistrySelect Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1002/slct.202404889
Kien Trung Pham, Hung Tran Nguyen, Thu Chau Uyen Le, Thien Tri Vu, Thanh Huu Le, Hieu Trung Le, Hang T. T. Le, Duong Duc La
{"title":"锂离子电池用铝负极材料结构相关电化学性质的比较研究","authors":"Kien Trung Pham,&nbsp;Hung Tran Nguyen,&nbsp;Thu Chau Uyen Le,&nbsp;Thien Tri Vu,&nbsp;Thanh Huu Le,&nbsp;Hieu Trung Le,&nbsp;Hang T. T. Le,&nbsp;Duong Duc La","doi":"10.1002/slct.202404889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study presents a comparative study on architecture-dependent electrochemical properties of anodes made from aluminum particles and aluminum foil for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) application. The purity and other physicochemical features were analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) methods. The electrochemical characteristics were determined by cycling voltammetry (CV) and galvanostatic charge/discharge (GCD) tests. The obtained results demonstrated that, due to the architecture nature of aluminum foil, the aluminum foil electrode had better conductivity and higher nucleation overpotential compared to the aluminum particles electrode, which involved other components such as PVDF as binder and carbon super P as conductive agent. Thus, the CV curves of the aluminum foil electrode showed sharper redox peaks with higher peak intensity. In addition, the aluminum foil electrode provided significantly higher initial capacity than that of the aluminum particles electrode. However, the architecture of the foil anode rendered it extremely prone to volume expansion during cycling, resulting in a fast and complete capacity fading just after 13 cycles. The anode made from aluminum particles, in contrast, witnessed slower capacity decay and ultimately stabilized at approximately 50 mAh g<sup>−1</sup> for extending cycles.</p>","PeriodicalId":146,"journal":{"name":"ChemistrySelect","volume":"9 43","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study on Architecture-Dependent Electrochemical Properties of Aluminum Anode Materials for Lithium-Ion Batteries\",\"authors\":\"Kien Trung Pham,&nbsp;Hung Tran Nguyen,&nbsp;Thu Chau Uyen Le,&nbsp;Thien Tri Vu,&nbsp;Thanh Huu Le,&nbsp;Hieu Trung Le,&nbsp;Hang T. T. Le,&nbsp;Duong Duc La\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/slct.202404889\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study presents a comparative study on architecture-dependent electrochemical properties of anodes made from aluminum particles and aluminum foil for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) application. The purity and other physicochemical features were analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) methods. The electrochemical characteristics were determined by cycling voltammetry (CV) and galvanostatic charge/discharge (GCD) tests. The obtained results demonstrated that, due to the architecture nature of aluminum foil, the aluminum foil electrode had better conductivity and higher nucleation overpotential compared to the aluminum particles electrode, which involved other components such as PVDF as binder and carbon super P as conductive agent. Thus, the CV curves of the aluminum foil electrode showed sharper redox peaks with higher peak intensity. In addition, the aluminum foil electrode provided significantly higher initial capacity than that of the aluminum particles electrode. However, the architecture of the foil anode rendered it extremely prone to volume expansion during cycling, resulting in a fast and complete capacity fading just after 13 cycles. The anode made from aluminum particles, in contrast, witnessed slower capacity decay and ultimately stabilized at approximately 50 mAh g<sup>−1</sup> for extending cycles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ChemistrySelect\",\"volume\":\"9 43\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ChemistrySelect\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/slct.202404889\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ChemistrySelect","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/slct.202404889","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究对铝颗粒和铝箔制成的锂离子电池(LIBs)阳极的电化学特性进行了比较研究。采用 X 射线衍射 (XRD)、能量色散 X 射线光谱 (EDX) 和扫描电子显微镜 (SEM) 方法分析了纯度和其他物理化学特征。通过循环伏安法(CV)和电静态充放电法(GCD)测试确定了其电化学特性。结果表明,由于铝箔的结构特性,铝箔电极与铝颗粒电极相比,具有更好的导电性和更高的成核过电位。因此,铝箔电极的 CV 曲线显示出更尖锐的氧化还原峰,峰值强度更高。此外,铝箔电极的初始容量明显高于铝颗粒电极。然而,铝箔阳极的结构使其在循环过程中极易发生体积膨胀,导致 13 个循环后容量迅速完全衰减。相比之下,由铝颗粒制成的阳极容量衰减较慢,在延长循环周期后最终稳定在约 50 mAh g-1 的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Study on Architecture-Dependent Electrochemical Properties of Aluminum Anode Materials for Lithium-Ion Batteries

This study presents a comparative study on architecture-dependent electrochemical properties of anodes made from aluminum particles and aluminum foil for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) application. The purity and other physicochemical features were analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) methods. The electrochemical characteristics were determined by cycling voltammetry (CV) and galvanostatic charge/discharge (GCD) tests. The obtained results demonstrated that, due to the architecture nature of aluminum foil, the aluminum foil electrode had better conductivity and higher nucleation overpotential compared to the aluminum particles electrode, which involved other components such as PVDF as binder and carbon super P as conductive agent. Thus, the CV curves of the aluminum foil electrode showed sharper redox peaks with higher peak intensity. In addition, the aluminum foil electrode provided significantly higher initial capacity than that of the aluminum particles electrode. However, the architecture of the foil anode rendered it extremely prone to volume expansion during cycling, resulting in a fast and complete capacity fading just after 13 cycles. The anode made from aluminum particles, in contrast, witnessed slower capacity decay and ultimately stabilized at approximately 50 mAh g−1 for extending cycles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ChemistrySelect
ChemistrySelect Chemistry-General Chemistry
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1809
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: ChemistrySelect is the latest journal from ChemPubSoc Europe and Wiley-VCH. It offers researchers a quality society-owned journal in which to publish their work in all areas of chemistry. Manuscripts are evaluated by active researchers to ensure they add meaningfully to the scientific literature, and those accepted are processed quickly to ensure rapid online publication.
期刊最新文献
Design of AIE-active Schiff-bases: Mechanochromic, Thermochromic and Sensing Studies Catalytic Conversion of 2-Phenethyl Phenyl Ether and 2-Phenoxy-1-Phenyl Ethanol Over ZSM-5, Y and Beta Zeolites Visible Light-Active Copper Cobaltite Supported Film for Hexavalent Chromium Photocatalytic Reduction Applications of Graphene Derivatives in All-Solid-State Supercapacitors A Computational Approach: Predicting iNOS Inhibition of Compounds for Alzheimer's Disease Treatment Through QSAR Modeling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1