增长的宇宙极限、情感丰富和自然权利:从 "美好生活"/"苏马克-卡瓦塞 "中获得的对 "脱增长 "文化政治的启示

IF 6.6 2区 经济学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Economics Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108442
Katharina Richter
{"title":"增长的宇宙极限、情感丰富和自然权利:从 \"美好生活\"/\"苏马克-卡瓦塞 \"中获得的对 \"脱增长 \"文化政治的启示","authors":"Katharina Richter","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article creates an inter-epistemic dialogue between degrowth and <em>Buen Vivir</em>/<em>sumak kawsay</em> based on qualitative research conducted in Ecuador. It builds on degrowth scholarship that considers cultural change an integral part of sustainability transformations. The article envisions what that change could look like by developing non-anthropocentric and de-individualised visions of sustainability transformations. It thereby advances recently reignited debates around limits to growth and artificial scarcity. <em>Buen Vivir</em>/<em>sumak kawsay</em> is an Andean-Amazonian indigenous conceptualisation of Good Living. An engagement with the reciprocal practices, behaviours and rituals of its protagonists yields three insights for the cultural politics of degrowth. First, <em>cosmological limits to growth</em> are normative constraints to harming the Living World and arise from relational ontologies that embed the human into the natural world. Second, the political economy of <em>Buen Vivir</em>/<em>sumak kawsay</em> produces <em>affective abundance</em> via reciprocity with the non-human world. This offers a de-individualised understanding of abundance for degrowth, beyond enjoyment and provision of universal basic services. Third, these ideas can be implemented in practice through Rights of Nature, put forward here as a viable policy option because of its potential to impute relational worldviews into materialist understandings of nature. These pluriverse avenues can enact cultural change towards sustainability transformations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"228 ","pages":"Article 108442"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cosmological limits to growth, affective abundance, and Rights of Nature: Insights from Buen Vivir/sumak kawsay for the cultural politics of degrowth\",\"authors\":\"Katharina Richter\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108442\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This article creates an inter-epistemic dialogue between degrowth and <em>Buen Vivir</em>/<em>sumak kawsay</em> based on qualitative research conducted in Ecuador. It builds on degrowth scholarship that considers cultural change an integral part of sustainability transformations. The article envisions what that change could look like by developing non-anthropocentric and de-individualised visions of sustainability transformations. It thereby advances recently reignited debates around limits to growth and artificial scarcity. <em>Buen Vivir</em>/<em>sumak kawsay</em> is an Andean-Amazonian indigenous conceptualisation of Good Living. An engagement with the reciprocal practices, behaviours and rituals of its protagonists yields three insights for the cultural politics of degrowth. First, <em>cosmological limits to growth</em> are normative constraints to harming the Living World and arise from relational ontologies that embed the human into the natural world. Second, the political economy of <em>Buen Vivir</em>/<em>sumak kawsay</em> produces <em>affective abundance</em> via reciprocity with the non-human world. This offers a de-individualised understanding of abundance for degrowth, beyond enjoyment and provision of universal basic services. Third, these ideas can be implemented in practice through Rights of Nature, put forward here as a viable policy option because of its potential to impute relational worldviews into materialist understandings of nature. These pluriverse avenues can enact cultural change towards sustainability transformations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Economics\",\"volume\":\"228 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108442\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924003392\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924003392","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以在厄瓜多尔进行的定性研究为基础,在 "退化 "与 "美好生活"/"Sumak kawsay "之间建立了一种跨学派对话。文章以 "降解增长 "学术研究为基础,认为文化变革是可持续发展变革不可分割的一部分。文章通过发展非人类中心主义和去个体化的可持续发展变革愿景,设想了这种变革可能是什么样的。文章由此推动了最近围绕增长极限和人为稀缺性重新展开的辩论。Buen Vivir/sumak kawsay 是安第斯-亚马孙土著对美好生活的概念化。通过研究其主人公的互惠实践、行为和仪式,我们可以对 "去增长 "的文化政治提出三点见解。首先,对增长的宇宙限制是对伤害 "生命世界 "的规范性约束,源于将人类嵌入自然世界的关系本体论。其次,"美好生活"(Buen Vivir)/"美好生活"(Sumak kawsay)的政治经济学通过与非人类世界的互惠产生了情感上的富足。这为脱增长提供了对富裕的去个体化理解,超越了享受和普遍基本服务的提供。第三,这些理念可以通过 "自然权利 "在实践中加以落实。"自然权利 "是一个可行的政策选择,因为它有可能将关系世界观纳入对自然的唯物主义理解。这些多元化的途径可以推动文化变革,实现可持续性转型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cosmological limits to growth, affective abundance, and Rights of Nature: Insights from Buen Vivir/sumak kawsay for the cultural politics of degrowth
This article creates an inter-epistemic dialogue between degrowth and Buen Vivir/sumak kawsay based on qualitative research conducted in Ecuador. It builds on degrowth scholarship that considers cultural change an integral part of sustainability transformations. The article envisions what that change could look like by developing non-anthropocentric and de-individualised visions of sustainability transformations. It thereby advances recently reignited debates around limits to growth and artificial scarcity. Buen Vivir/sumak kawsay is an Andean-Amazonian indigenous conceptualisation of Good Living. An engagement with the reciprocal practices, behaviours and rituals of its protagonists yields three insights for the cultural politics of degrowth. First, cosmological limits to growth are normative constraints to harming the Living World and arise from relational ontologies that embed the human into the natural world. Second, the political economy of Buen Vivir/sumak kawsay produces affective abundance via reciprocity with the non-human world. This offers a de-individualised understanding of abundance for degrowth, beyond enjoyment and provision of universal basic services. Third, these ideas can be implemented in practice through Rights of Nature, put forward here as a viable policy option because of its potential to impute relational worldviews into materialist understandings of nature. These pluriverse avenues can enact cultural change towards sustainability transformations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Economics
Ecological Economics 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
313
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership. Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.
期刊最新文献
Effect simulation and local adaptation of multi-agent collaborative governance in marine eco-economic systems: Evidence from China Carbon Giants: Exploring the Top 100 Industrial CO2 Emitters in the EU Public support for degrowth policies and sufficiency behaviours in the United States: A discrete choice experiment Social comparison nudges: What actually happens when we are told what others do? Breaking the bag habit: Testing interventions to reduce plastic bag demand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1