通过实验校准改进脑深部刺激的计算模型。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Journal of Neuroscience Methods Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110320
Jan Philipp Payonk , Henning Bathel , Nils Arbeiter , Maria Kober , Mareike Fauser , Alexander Storch , Ursula van Rienen , Julius Zimmermann
{"title":"通过实验校准改进脑深部刺激的计算模型。","authors":"Jan Philipp Payonk ,&nbsp;Henning Bathel ,&nbsp;Nils Arbeiter ,&nbsp;Maria Kober ,&nbsp;Mareike Fauser ,&nbsp;Alexander Storch ,&nbsp;Ursula van Rienen ,&nbsp;Julius Zimmermann","doi":"10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background:</h3><div>Deep brain stimulation has become a well-established clinical tool to treat movement disorders. Nevertheless, the knowledge of processes initiated by the stimulation remains limited. To address this knowledge gap, computational models are developed to gain deeper insight. However, their predictive power remains constrained by model uncertainties and a lack of validation and calibration.</div></div><div><h3>New method:</h3><div>Exemplified with rodent microelectrodes, we present a workflow for validating electrode model geometry using microscopy and impedance spectroscopy <em>in vitro</em> before implantation. We address uncertainties in the tissue distribution and dielectric properties and outline a concept for calibrating the computational model based on <em>in vivo</em> impedance spectroscopy measurements.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>The standard deviation of the volume of tissue activated across the 18 characterized electrodes was approximately 32.93%, underscoring the importance of electrode characterization. Thus, the workflow significantly enhances the model predictions’ credibility of neural activation exemplified in a rodent model.</div></div><div><h3>Comparison with existing methods:</h3><div>Computational models are frequently employed without validation or calibration, relying instead on manufacturers’ specifications. Our approach provides an accessible method to obtain a validated and calibrated electrode geometry, which significantly enhances the reliability of the computational model that relies on this electrode.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>By reducing the uncertainties of the model, the accuracy in predicting neural activation is increased. The entire workflow is realized in open-source software, making it adaptable for other use cases, such as deep brain stimulation in humans. Additionally, the framework allows for the integration of further experiments, enabling live updates and refinements to computational models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16415,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","volume":"414 ","pages":"Article 110320"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving computational models of deep brain stimulation through experimental calibration\",\"authors\":\"Jan Philipp Payonk ,&nbsp;Henning Bathel ,&nbsp;Nils Arbeiter ,&nbsp;Maria Kober ,&nbsp;Mareike Fauser ,&nbsp;Alexander Storch ,&nbsp;Ursula van Rienen ,&nbsp;Julius Zimmermann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110320\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background:</h3><div>Deep brain stimulation has become a well-established clinical tool to treat movement disorders. Nevertheless, the knowledge of processes initiated by the stimulation remains limited. To address this knowledge gap, computational models are developed to gain deeper insight. However, their predictive power remains constrained by model uncertainties and a lack of validation and calibration.</div></div><div><h3>New method:</h3><div>Exemplified with rodent microelectrodes, we present a workflow for validating electrode model geometry using microscopy and impedance spectroscopy <em>in vitro</em> before implantation. We address uncertainties in the tissue distribution and dielectric properties and outline a concept for calibrating the computational model based on <em>in vivo</em> impedance spectroscopy measurements.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>The standard deviation of the volume of tissue activated across the 18 characterized electrodes was approximately 32.93%, underscoring the importance of electrode characterization. Thus, the workflow significantly enhances the model predictions’ credibility of neural activation exemplified in a rodent model.</div></div><div><h3>Comparison with existing methods:</h3><div>Computational models are frequently employed without validation or calibration, relying instead on manufacturers’ specifications. Our approach provides an accessible method to obtain a validated and calibrated electrode geometry, which significantly enhances the reliability of the computational model that relies on this electrode.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>By reducing the uncertainties of the model, the accuracy in predicting neural activation is increased. The entire workflow is realized in open-source software, making it adaptable for other use cases, such as deep brain stimulation in humans. Additionally, the framework allows for the integration of further experiments, enabling live updates and refinements to computational models.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuroscience Methods\",\"volume\":\"414 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110320\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuroscience Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165027024002656\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165027024002656","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:深部脑刺激已成为治疗运动障碍的成熟临床工具。然而,人们对刺激过程的了解仍然有限。为了填补这一知识空白,人们开发了计算模型以获得更深入的了解。然而,这些模型的预测能力仍然受到模型不确定性以及缺乏验证和校准的限制:新方法:以啮齿类动物微电极为例,我们介绍了一种在植入前利用显微镜和阻抗谱在体外验证电极模型几何形状的工作流程。我们讨论了组织分布和介电特性的不确定性,并概述了根据体内阻抗谱测量结果校准计算模型的概念:结果:18 个表征电极上被激活的组织体积的标准偏差约为 32.93%,凸显了电极表征的重要性。因此,该工作流程大大提高了以啮齿动物模型为例的神经激活模型预测的可信度:与现有方法的比较:计算模型通常未经验证或校准,而是依赖于制造商的规格。我们的方法提供了一种获得经过验证和校准的电极几何形状的简便方法,从而大大提高了依赖该电极的计算模型的可靠性:结论:通过减少模型的不确定性,提高了预测神经激活的准确性。整个工作流程是在开源软件中实现的,因此可适用于其他用例,如人类深部脑刺激。此外,该框架还可以整合更多实验,实现计算模型的实时更新和完善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improving computational models of deep brain stimulation through experimental calibration

Background:

Deep brain stimulation has become a well-established clinical tool to treat movement disorders. Nevertheless, the knowledge of processes initiated by the stimulation remains limited. To address this knowledge gap, computational models are developed to gain deeper insight. However, their predictive power remains constrained by model uncertainties and a lack of validation and calibration.

New method:

Exemplified with rodent microelectrodes, we present a workflow for validating electrode model geometry using microscopy and impedance spectroscopy in vitro before implantation. We address uncertainties in the tissue distribution and dielectric properties and outline a concept for calibrating the computational model based on in vivo impedance spectroscopy measurements.

Results:

The standard deviation of the volume of tissue activated across the 18 characterized electrodes was approximately 32.93%, underscoring the importance of electrode characterization. Thus, the workflow significantly enhances the model predictions’ credibility of neural activation exemplified in a rodent model.

Comparison with existing methods:

Computational models are frequently employed without validation or calibration, relying instead on manufacturers’ specifications. Our approach provides an accessible method to obtain a validated and calibrated electrode geometry, which significantly enhances the reliability of the computational model that relies on this electrode.

Conclusion:

By reducing the uncertainties of the model, the accuracy in predicting neural activation is increased. The entire workflow is realized in open-source software, making it adaptable for other use cases, such as deep brain stimulation in humans. Additionally, the framework allows for the integration of further experiments, enabling live updates and refinements to computational models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
Journal of Neuroscience Methods 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuroscience Methods publishes papers that describe new methods that are specifically for neuroscience research conducted in invertebrates, vertebrates or in man. Major methodological improvements or important refinements of established neuroscience methods are also considered for publication. The Journal''s Scope includes all aspects of contemporary neuroscience research, including anatomical, behavioural, biochemical, cellular, computational, molecular, invasive and non-invasive imaging, optogenetic, and physiological research investigations.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Enhancing detection of SSVEP-based BCIs via a novel temporally local canonical correlation analysis Improving computational models of deep brain stimulation through experimental calibration ST-SHAP: A hierarchical and explainable attention network for emotional EEG representation learning and decoding Adaptive wheel exercise for mouse models of Parkinson’s Disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1