Manuel Ayala-Chauvin, Fernando A Chicaiza, Patricia Acosta-Vargas, Janio Jadan, Verónica Maldonado-Garcés, Esteban Ortiz-Prado, Gloria Acosta-Vargas, Mayra Carrión-Toro, Marco Santórum, Mario Gonzalez-Rodriguez, Camila Madera, Wilmer Esparza
{"title":"基于网络的肺部远程康复:系统综述。","authors":"Manuel Ayala-Chauvin, Fernando A Chicaiza, Patricia Acosta-Vargas, Janio Jadan, Verónica Maldonado-Garcés, Esteban Ortiz-Prado, Gloria Acosta-Vargas, Mayra Carrión-Toro, Marco Santórum, Mario Gonzalez-Rodriguez, Camila Madera, Wilmer Esparza","doi":"10.1038/s41533-024-00396-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Web-based pulmonary telerehabilitation (WBPTR) can serve as a valuable tool when access to conventional care is limited. This review assesses a series of studies that explore pulmonary telerehabilitation programmes delivered via web-based platforms. The studies involved participants with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Of the 3190 participants, 1697 engaged in WBPTR platforms, while the remaining 1493 comprised the control groups. Sixteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. Web-based pulmonary telerehabilitation led to an increase in daily step count (MD 446.66, 95% CI 96.47 to 796.86), though this did not meet the minimum clinically important difference. Additionally, WBPTR did not yield significant improvements in the six-minute walking test (MD 5.01, 95% CI - 5.19 to 15.21), health-related quality of life as measured by the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (MD - 0.15, 95% CI - 2.24 to 1.95), or the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (MD 0.17, 95% CI - 0.13 to 0.46). Moreover, there was no significant improvement in dyspnoea-related health status, as assessed by the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (MD - 0.01, 95% CI - 0.29 to 0.27) or the modified Medical Research Council Dyspnoea Scale (MD - 0.14, 95% CI - 0.43 to 0.14). Based on these findings, this review concludes that WBPTR does not offer substantial advantages over traditional care. While slight improvements in exercise performance were observed, no meaningful enhancements were noted in dyspnoea or quality of life metrics. Overall, WBPTR remains a complementary and accessible option for managing and monitoring COPD patients. However, further research and innovation are required to improve its efficacy and adapt it to various clinical environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":"34 1","pages":"38"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569176/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Web-based pulmonary telehabilitation: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Manuel Ayala-Chauvin, Fernando A Chicaiza, Patricia Acosta-Vargas, Janio Jadan, Verónica Maldonado-Garcés, Esteban Ortiz-Prado, Gloria Acosta-Vargas, Mayra Carrión-Toro, Marco Santórum, Mario Gonzalez-Rodriguez, Camila Madera, Wilmer Esparza\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41533-024-00396-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Web-based pulmonary telerehabilitation (WBPTR) can serve as a valuable tool when access to conventional care is limited. This review assesses a series of studies that explore pulmonary telerehabilitation programmes delivered via web-based platforms. The studies involved participants with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Of the 3190 participants, 1697 engaged in WBPTR platforms, while the remaining 1493 comprised the control groups. Sixteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. Web-based pulmonary telerehabilitation led to an increase in daily step count (MD 446.66, 95% CI 96.47 to 796.86), though this did not meet the minimum clinically important difference. Additionally, WBPTR did not yield significant improvements in the six-minute walking test (MD 5.01, 95% CI - 5.19 to 15.21), health-related quality of life as measured by the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (MD - 0.15, 95% CI - 2.24 to 1.95), or the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (MD 0.17, 95% CI - 0.13 to 0.46). Moreover, there was no significant improvement in dyspnoea-related health status, as assessed by the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (MD - 0.01, 95% CI - 0.29 to 0.27) or the modified Medical Research Council Dyspnoea Scale (MD - 0.14, 95% CI - 0.43 to 0.14). Based on these findings, this review concludes that WBPTR does not offer substantial advantages over traditional care. While slight improvements in exercise performance were observed, no meaningful enhancements were noted in dyspnoea or quality of life metrics. Overall, WBPTR remains a complementary and accessible option for managing and monitoring COPD patients. However, further research and innovation are required to improve its efficacy and adapt it to various clinical environments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19470,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569176/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-024-00396-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-024-00396-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
基于网络的肺部远程康复(WBPTR)可以在传统治疗手段有限的情况下作为一种有价值的工具。本综述评估了一系列探讨通过网络平台提供肺远程康复项目的研究。这些研究涉及患有中度至重度慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)的参与者。在 3190 名参与者中,有 1697 人参与了 WBPTR 平台,其余 1493 人组成对照组。16项研究被纳入荟萃分析。基于网络的肺远程康复可增加每日步数(MD 446.66,95% CI 96.47 至 796.86),但未达到最小临床重要性差异。此外,WBPTR 在六分钟步行测试(MD 5.01,95% CI - 5.19 至 15.21)、圣乔治呼吸问卷(MD - 0.15,95% CI - 2.24 至 1.95)或慢性呼吸系统疾病问卷(MD 0.17,95% CI - 0.13 至 0.46)等健康相关生活质量方面均无显著改善。此外,通过慢性呼吸系统疾病问卷(MD - 0.01,95% CI - 0.29 至 0.27)或改良的医学研究委员会呼吸困难量表(MD - 0.14,95% CI - 0.43 至 0.14)评估,呼吸困难相关的健康状况没有明显改善。基于这些研究结果,本综述得出结论,WBPTR 与传统护理相比并无实质性优势。虽然运动表现略有改善,但在呼吸困难或生活质量指标方面没有发现有意义的改善。总体而言,WBPTR 仍是管理和监测慢性阻塞性肺病患者的一种补充性、可及性选择。不过,还需要进一步研究和创新,以提高其疗效并使其适应各种临床环境。
Web-based pulmonary telehabilitation: a systematic review.
Web-based pulmonary telerehabilitation (WBPTR) can serve as a valuable tool when access to conventional care is limited. This review assesses a series of studies that explore pulmonary telerehabilitation programmes delivered via web-based platforms. The studies involved participants with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Of the 3190 participants, 1697 engaged in WBPTR platforms, while the remaining 1493 comprised the control groups. Sixteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. Web-based pulmonary telerehabilitation led to an increase in daily step count (MD 446.66, 95% CI 96.47 to 796.86), though this did not meet the minimum clinically important difference. Additionally, WBPTR did not yield significant improvements in the six-minute walking test (MD 5.01, 95% CI - 5.19 to 15.21), health-related quality of life as measured by the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (MD - 0.15, 95% CI - 2.24 to 1.95), or the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (MD 0.17, 95% CI - 0.13 to 0.46). Moreover, there was no significant improvement in dyspnoea-related health status, as assessed by the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (MD - 0.01, 95% CI - 0.29 to 0.27) or the modified Medical Research Council Dyspnoea Scale (MD - 0.14, 95% CI - 0.43 to 0.14). Based on these findings, this review concludes that WBPTR does not offer substantial advantages over traditional care. While slight improvements in exercise performance were observed, no meaningful enhancements were noted in dyspnoea or quality of life metrics. Overall, WBPTR remains a complementary and accessible option for managing and monitoring COPD patients. However, further research and innovation are required to improve its efficacy and adapt it to various clinical environments.
期刊介绍:
npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine is an open access, online-only, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to publishing high-quality research in all areas of the primary care management of respiratory and respiratory-related allergic diseases. Papers published by the journal represent important advances of significance to specialists within the fields of primary care and respiratory medicine. We are particularly interested in receiving papers in relation to the following aspects of respiratory medicine, respiratory-related allergic diseases and tobacco control:
epidemiology
prevention
clinical care
service delivery and organisation of healthcare (including implementation science)
global health.