抗坏血酸和葡萄糖会对尿液中生化分析物的定量检测造成严重干扰。

Sara Mašković, Nora Nikolac Gabaj
{"title":"抗坏血酸和葡萄糖会对尿液中生化分析物的定量检测造成严重干扰。","authors":"Sara Mašković, Nora Nikolac Gabaj","doi":"10.1093/labmed/lmae089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Preanalytical errors due to interferences can lead to inaccurate results, necessitating an understanding of potential interferences for each test. This study explores the impact of elevated concentrations of ascorbic acid and glucose on urine analysis, a pivotal diagnostic tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Conducted at the Clinical Institute of Chemistry, KBC Sestre milosrdnice, the research utilized a 24-hour urine sample. Parameters assessed included total proteins, albumin, amylase, sodium, potassium, chlorides, calcium, phosphates, magnesium, creatinine, urea, and uric acid. Various concentrations of added interferents were prepared for duplicate measurements using statistical analysis in Microsoft Excel.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant interferences were found in albumin, amylase, sodium, potassium, or phosphate concentrations. However, ascorbic acid interfered with chloride, calcium, and magnesium determinations. Conversely, elevated glucose affected total protein, calcium, magnesium, creatinine, urea, and uric acid determinations. Interference of ascorbic acid with chloride and interference of glucose with total proteins and uric acid displayed a linear relationship.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results suggest cautious analysis interpretation from certain parameters in patients with elevated glucose and/or ascorbic acid in urine. Whereas ascorbic acid interference may go unnoticed due to its infrequent measurement, routine determination of glucose in urine is crucial, especially for diabetes patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94124,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ascorbic acid and glucose can cause significant interference on quantitative measurement of biochemistry analytes in urine.\",\"authors\":\"Sara Mašković, Nora Nikolac Gabaj\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/labmed/lmae089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Preanalytical errors due to interferences can lead to inaccurate results, necessitating an understanding of potential interferences for each test. This study explores the impact of elevated concentrations of ascorbic acid and glucose on urine analysis, a pivotal diagnostic tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Conducted at the Clinical Institute of Chemistry, KBC Sestre milosrdnice, the research utilized a 24-hour urine sample. Parameters assessed included total proteins, albumin, amylase, sodium, potassium, chlorides, calcium, phosphates, magnesium, creatinine, urea, and uric acid. Various concentrations of added interferents were prepared for duplicate measurements using statistical analysis in Microsoft Excel.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant interferences were found in albumin, amylase, sodium, potassium, or phosphate concentrations. However, ascorbic acid interfered with chloride, calcium, and magnesium determinations. Conversely, elevated glucose affected total protein, calcium, magnesium, creatinine, urea, and uric acid determinations. Interference of ascorbic acid with chloride and interference of glucose with total proteins and uric acid displayed a linear relationship.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results suggest cautious analysis interpretation from certain parameters in patients with elevated glucose and/or ascorbic acid in urine. Whereas ascorbic acid interference may go unnoticed due to its infrequent measurement, routine determination of glucose in urine is crucial, especially for diabetes patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laboratory medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laboratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmae089\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmae089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:干扰导致的分析前误差会导致结果不准确,因此有必要了解每种检验的潜在干扰。本研究探讨了抗坏血酸和葡萄糖浓度升高对尿液分析这一关键诊断工具的影响:研究在 KBC Sestre milosrdnice 临床化学研究所进行,采用 24 小时尿液样本。评估参数包括总蛋白、白蛋白、淀粉酶、钠、钾、氯化物、钙、磷酸盐、镁、肌酐、尿素和尿酸。使用 Microsoft Excel 进行统计分析,准备了不同浓度的添加干扰物进行重复测量:结果:在白蛋白、淀粉酶、钠、钾或磷酸盐浓度方面没有发现统计学意义上的明显干扰。然而,抗坏血酸会干扰氯化物、钙和镁的测定。相反,葡萄糖升高会影响总蛋白、钙、镁、肌酐、尿素和尿酸的测定。抗坏血酸对氯化物的干扰与葡萄糖对总蛋白和尿酸的干扰呈线性关系:结果表明,对于尿液中葡萄糖和/或抗坏血酸升高的患者,对某些参数的分析解释应谨慎。抗坏血酸的干扰可能会因为不经常测量而被忽视,而尿液中葡萄糖的常规测定则至关重要,尤其是对糖尿病患者而言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ascorbic acid and glucose can cause significant interference on quantitative measurement of biochemistry analytes in urine.

Background and aims: Preanalytical errors due to interferences can lead to inaccurate results, necessitating an understanding of potential interferences for each test. This study explores the impact of elevated concentrations of ascorbic acid and glucose on urine analysis, a pivotal diagnostic tool.

Methods: Conducted at the Clinical Institute of Chemistry, KBC Sestre milosrdnice, the research utilized a 24-hour urine sample. Parameters assessed included total proteins, albumin, amylase, sodium, potassium, chlorides, calcium, phosphates, magnesium, creatinine, urea, and uric acid. Various concentrations of added interferents were prepared for duplicate measurements using statistical analysis in Microsoft Excel.

Results: No statistically significant interferences were found in albumin, amylase, sodium, potassium, or phosphate concentrations. However, ascorbic acid interfered with chloride, calcium, and magnesium determinations. Conversely, elevated glucose affected total protein, calcium, magnesium, creatinine, urea, and uric acid determinations. Interference of ascorbic acid with chloride and interference of glucose with total proteins and uric acid displayed a linear relationship.

Conclusions: Results suggest cautious analysis interpretation from certain parameters in patients with elevated glucose and/or ascorbic acid in urine. Whereas ascorbic acid interference may go unnoticed due to its infrequent measurement, routine determination of glucose in urine is crucial, especially for diabetes patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of basic lymphocyte phenotype results between a diagnostic and a research laboratory. Evidence-based approach for the generation of a multivariate logistic regression model that predicts instrument failure. Correlation of the abundance of MDSCs, Tregs, PD-1, and PD-L1 with the efficacy of chemotherapy and prognosis in gastric cancer. Correction to: The utility of an algorithm based on procalcitonin monitoring in patients with sepsis. Implementing laboratory internal audit to improve compliance and quality of care in the municipal public health system-based ambulatory care health clinics in New York city.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1