{"title":"构建用于预测脊柱转移手术治疗后骨水泥渗漏的风险模型并进行临床验证。","authors":"Yanrong Liu, Ziyan Zhang, Jianzhong Huo","doi":"10.62347/JAIR5009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to comprehensively analyze the risk factors associated with bone cement leakage (LCK) during the surgical management of spinal metastases, construct a joint risk model for predictive assessment, and validate the clinical applicability of the risk model in an independent patient cohort. A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent surgery for spinal metastases between February 2022 and June 2023. Patients were divided into a non-LCK group (n=134) and an LCK group (n=86) based on the presence or absence of bone cement leakage after surgery. Additionally, a validation group was established, consisting of 21 patients with LCK and 65 patients without. Analysis focused on patient demographics, intraoperative parameters, LCK location, complications, pain management, and improvements in activities of daily living (ADL). Logistic regression, calibration curve, clinical impact curve (CIC) analysis, decision curve analysis (DCA) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were used to assess the risk factors and construct a joint risk model. There were significant differences between the two groups in pathologic fracture, Tomita classification, posterior wall destruction, injected laterality, injected bone cement volume, radicular pain, pulmonary embolism, and medullary compression. Pathologic fracture, radicular pain, pulmonary embolism, and medullary compression were positively correlated with the occurrence of LCK, while Tomita classification, posterior wall destruction, injection laterality, and injected bone cement volume were negatively correlated with the occurrence of LCK. Pathological fracture, Tomita classification, posterior wall destruction, injected laterality, injected bone cement volume, and specific postoperative complications were identified as significant risk factors associated with LCK. The constructed joint risk model, incorporating these risk factors, demonstrated substantial predictive value, with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.885. Clinical validation in an independent patient cohort further confirmed the predictive power of the joint risk model, with an AUC of 0.846. This study underscores the multifactorial nature of LCK in surgical management of spinal metastases, providing valuable insights for risk assessment and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":7437,"journal":{"name":"American journal of cancer research","volume":"14 10","pages":"4841-4854"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11560829/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Construction and clinical validation of risk model for predicting bone cement leakage after the surgical management of spinal metastases.\",\"authors\":\"Yanrong Liu, Ziyan Zhang, Jianzhong Huo\",\"doi\":\"10.62347/JAIR5009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to comprehensively analyze the risk factors associated with bone cement leakage (LCK) during the surgical management of spinal metastases, construct a joint risk model for predictive assessment, and validate the clinical applicability of the risk model in an independent patient cohort. A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent surgery for spinal metastases between February 2022 and June 2023. Patients were divided into a non-LCK group (n=134) and an LCK group (n=86) based on the presence or absence of bone cement leakage after surgery. Additionally, a validation group was established, consisting of 21 patients with LCK and 65 patients without. Analysis focused on patient demographics, intraoperative parameters, LCK location, complications, pain management, and improvements in activities of daily living (ADL). Logistic regression, calibration curve, clinical impact curve (CIC) analysis, decision curve analysis (DCA) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were used to assess the risk factors and construct a joint risk model. There were significant differences between the two groups in pathologic fracture, Tomita classification, posterior wall destruction, injected laterality, injected bone cement volume, radicular pain, pulmonary embolism, and medullary compression. Pathologic fracture, radicular pain, pulmonary embolism, and medullary compression were positively correlated with the occurrence of LCK, while Tomita classification, posterior wall destruction, injection laterality, and injected bone cement volume were negatively correlated with the occurrence of LCK. Pathological fracture, Tomita classification, posterior wall destruction, injected laterality, injected bone cement volume, and specific postoperative complications were identified as significant risk factors associated with LCK. The constructed joint risk model, incorporating these risk factors, demonstrated substantial predictive value, with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.885. Clinical validation in an independent patient cohort further confirmed the predictive power of the joint risk model, with an AUC of 0.846. This study underscores the multifactorial nature of LCK in surgical management of spinal metastases, providing valuable insights for risk assessment and management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of cancer research\",\"volume\":\"14 10\",\"pages\":\"4841-4854\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11560829/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of cancer research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62347/JAIR5009\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/JAIR5009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Construction and clinical validation of risk model for predicting bone cement leakage after the surgical management of spinal metastases.
This study aimed to comprehensively analyze the risk factors associated with bone cement leakage (LCK) during the surgical management of spinal metastases, construct a joint risk model for predictive assessment, and validate the clinical applicability of the risk model in an independent patient cohort. A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent surgery for spinal metastases between February 2022 and June 2023. Patients were divided into a non-LCK group (n=134) and an LCK group (n=86) based on the presence or absence of bone cement leakage after surgery. Additionally, a validation group was established, consisting of 21 patients with LCK and 65 patients without. Analysis focused on patient demographics, intraoperative parameters, LCK location, complications, pain management, and improvements in activities of daily living (ADL). Logistic regression, calibration curve, clinical impact curve (CIC) analysis, decision curve analysis (DCA) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were used to assess the risk factors and construct a joint risk model. There were significant differences between the two groups in pathologic fracture, Tomita classification, posterior wall destruction, injected laterality, injected bone cement volume, radicular pain, pulmonary embolism, and medullary compression. Pathologic fracture, radicular pain, pulmonary embolism, and medullary compression were positively correlated with the occurrence of LCK, while Tomita classification, posterior wall destruction, injection laterality, and injected bone cement volume were negatively correlated with the occurrence of LCK. Pathological fracture, Tomita classification, posterior wall destruction, injected laterality, injected bone cement volume, and specific postoperative complications were identified as significant risk factors associated with LCK. The constructed joint risk model, incorporating these risk factors, demonstrated substantial predictive value, with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.885. Clinical validation in an independent patient cohort further confirmed the predictive power of the joint risk model, with an AUC of 0.846. This study underscores the multifactorial nature of LCK in surgical management of spinal metastases, providing valuable insights for risk assessment and management.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Cancer Research (AJCR) (ISSN 2156-6976), is an independent open access, online only journal to facilitate rapid dissemination of novel discoveries in basic science and treatment of cancer. It was founded by a group of scientists for cancer research and clinical academic oncologists from around the world, who are devoted to the promotion and advancement of our understanding of the cancer and its treatment. The scope of AJCR is intended to encompass that of multi-disciplinary researchers from any scientific discipline where the primary focus of the research is to increase and integrate knowledge about etiology and molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis with the ultimate aim of advancing the cure and prevention of this increasingly devastating disease. To achieve these aims AJCR will publish review articles, original articles and new techniques in cancer research and therapy. It will also publish hypothesis, case reports and letter to the editor. Unlike most other open access online journals, AJCR will keep most of the traditional features of paper print that we are all familiar with, such as continuous volume, issue numbers, as well as continuous page numbers to retain our comfortable familiarity towards an academic journal.