利用传统和弥散加权磁共振成像参数识别局部前列腺癌患者的高危肿瘤特征。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY American journal of cancer research Pub Date : 2024-10-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.62347/XADT5737
Min Wang, Jianrong Wen, Peijun Liu
{"title":"利用传统和弥散加权磁共振成像参数识别局部前列腺癌患者的高危肿瘤特征。","authors":"Min Wang, Jianrong Wen, Peijun Liu","doi":"10.62347/XADT5737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study was to investigate the utility of conventional imaging combined with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in identifying high-risk tumor characteristics in patients with localized prostate cancer. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 194 patients who underwent surgery for localized prostate cancer. Patients were categorized into low-risk and high-risk groups based on clinical criteria. Imaging data were obtained using a MRI system, and various imaging parameters were analyzed, including T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) signal intensities, diffusion-weighted MRI parameters, and their correlations with clinical characteristics. Statistical methods such as logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were employed to assess the diagnostic performance of the imaging parameters and to construct joint prediction models. A verification set prediction model was established and compared. The comparison of demographic and clinical characteristics between the low and high-risk groups revealed significant differences in the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, Gleason score, Tumor Size and prostate volume (PV). Standard imaging parameters, T1WI and T2WI signal intensities, exhibited significant differences between the low and high-risk groups. Additionally, diffusion-weighted MRI parameters, including signal intensities at different b values, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), K<sup>trans</sup>, and K<sub>ep</sub>, were notably associated with high-risk tumor characteristics in localized prostate cancer. Logistic regression analysis identified both standard imaging and diffusion-weighted MRI parameters as independent predictors of high-risk tumor characteristics. Furthermore, the ROC analysis demonstrated the diagnostic potential of T2WI signal intensity, signal intensity at 800 s/mm<sup>2</sup>, and ADC in identifying high-risk tumors. Joint prediction models combining standard imaging and diffusion-weighted MRI parameters showed high predictive accuracy for high-risk tumor characteristics in localized prostate cancer, with Area Under the Curve (AUC) values of 0.777 for standard imaging, 0.826 for diffusion-weighted MRI, and 0.892 for the combined model. The AUC value for the prediction model in validation set was 0.860. In conclusion, this study underscores the diagnostic potential of conventional imaging combined with diffusion-weighted MRI in identifying high-risk tumor characteristics in patients with localized prostate cancer. Both standard imaging and diffusion-weighted MRI parameters were identified as non-invasive biomarkers for risk assessment and prognosis. These findings have implications for precision treatment of localized prostate cancer, highlighting the potential integration of imaging-based risk assessment tools into clinical practice for tailored treatment strategies and improved patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7437,"journal":{"name":"American journal of cancer research","volume":"14 10","pages":"4909-4921"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11560813/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification of high-risk tumor characteristics in patients with localized prostate cancer using conventional combined with diffusion-weighted MRI imaging parameters.\",\"authors\":\"Min Wang, Jianrong Wen, Peijun Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.62347/XADT5737\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The objective of this study was to investigate the utility of conventional imaging combined with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in identifying high-risk tumor characteristics in patients with localized prostate cancer. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 194 patients who underwent surgery for localized prostate cancer. Patients were categorized into low-risk and high-risk groups based on clinical criteria. Imaging data were obtained using a MRI system, and various imaging parameters were analyzed, including T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) signal intensities, diffusion-weighted MRI parameters, and their correlations with clinical characteristics. Statistical methods such as logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were employed to assess the diagnostic performance of the imaging parameters and to construct joint prediction models. A verification set prediction model was established and compared. The comparison of demographic and clinical characteristics between the low and high-risk groups revealed significant differences in the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, Gleason score, Tumor Size and prostate volume (PV). Standard imaging parameters, T1WI and T2WI signal intensities, exhibited significant differences between the low and high-risk groups. Additionally, diffusion-weighted MRI parameters, including signal intensities at different b values, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), K<sup>trans</sup>, and K<sub>ep</sub>, were notably associated with high-risk tumor characteristics in localized prostate cancer. Logistic regression analysis identified both standard imaging and diffusion-weighted MRI parameters as independent predictors of high-risk tumor characteristics. Furthermore, the ROC analysis demonstrated the diagnostic potential of T2WI signal intensity, signal intensity at 800 s/mm<sup>2</sup>, and ADC in identifying high-risk tumors. Joint prediction models combining standard imaging and diffusion-weighted MRI parameters showed high predictive accuracy for high-risk tumor characteristics in localized prostate cancer, with Area Under the Curve (AUC) values of 0.777 for standard imaging, 0.826 for diffusion-weighted MRI, and 0.892 for the combined model. The AUC value for the prediction model in validation set was 0.860. In conclusion, this study underscores the diagnostic potential of conventional imaging combined with diffusion-weighted MRI in identifying high-risk tumor characteristics in patients with localized prostate cancer. Both standard imaging and diffusion-weighted MRI parameters were identified as non-invasive biomarkers for risk assessment and prognosis. These findings have implications for precision treatment of localized prostate cancer, highlighting the potential integration of imaging-based risk assessment tools into clinical practice for tailored treatment strategies and improved patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of cancer research\",\"volume\":\"14 10\",\"pages\":\"4909-4921\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11560813/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of cancer research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62347/XADT5737\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/XADT5737","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是探讨传统成像结合弥散加权磁共振成像(MRI)在识别局部前列腺癌患者高危肿瘤特征方面的作用。该研究对 194 名接受局部前列腺癌手术的患者进行了回顾性队列研究。根据临床标准将患者分为低危和高危组。研究人员使用核磁共振成像系统获取了成像数据,并分析了各种成像参数,包括 T1 加权成像(T1WI)、T2 加权成像(T2WI)信号强度、弥散加权核磁共振成像参数及其与临床特征的相关性。采用逻辑回归和接收者操作特征(ROC)分析等统计方法评估成像参数的诊断性能,并构建联合预测模型。建立并比较了验证集预测模型。通过比较低危组和高危组的人口统计学和临床特征,发现他们在前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平、Gleason评分、肿瘤大小和前列腺体积(PV)方面存在显著差异。标准成像参数 T1WI 和 T2WI 信号强度在低风险组和高风险组之间存在显著差异。此外,弥散加权磁共振成像参数(包括不同b值的信号强度、表观弥散系数(ADC)、Ktrans和Kep)与局部前列腺癌的高危肿瘤特征明显相关。逻辑回归分析发现,标准成像和弥散加权磁共振成像参数都是高危肿瘤特征的独立预测因子。此外,ROC 分析表明 T2WI 信号强度、800 s/mm2 信号强度和 ADC 在识别高危肿瘤方面具有诊断潜力。结合标准成像和弥散加权磁共振成像参数的联合预测模型对局部前列腺癌高危肿瘤特征的预测准确率很高,标准成像的曲线下面积(AUC)值为0.777,弥散加权磁共振成像为0.826,联合模型为0.892。验证集预测模型的 AUC 值为 0.860。总之,这项研究强调了常规成像结合弥散加权磁共振成像在识别局部前列腺癌患者高危肿瘤特征方面的诊断潜力。标准成像和弥散加权磁共振成像参数都被确定为风险评估和预后的非侵入性生物标志物。这些研究结果对局部前列腺癌的精准治疗具有重要意义,强调了将基于成像的风险评估工具整合到临床实践中的潜力,以制定有针对性的治疗策略并改善患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Identification of high-risk tumor characteristics in patients with localized prostate cancer using conventional combined with diffusion-weighted MRI imaging parameters.

The objective of this study was to investigate the utility of conventional imaging combined with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in identifying high-risk tumor characteristics in patients with localized prostate cancer. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 194 patients who underwent surgery for localized prostate cancer. Patients were categorized into low-risk and high-risk groups based on clinical criteria. Imaging data were obtained using a MRI system, and various imaging parameters were analyzed, including T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) signal intensities, diffusion-weighted MRI parameters, and their correlations with clinical characteristics. Statistical methods such as logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were employed to assess the diagnostic performance of the imaging parameters and to construct joint prediction models. A verification set prediction model was established and compared. The comparison of demographic and clinical characteristics between the low and high-risk groups revealed significant differences in the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, Gleason score, Tumor Size and prostate volume (PV). Standard imaging parameters, T1WI and T2WI signal intensities, exhibited significant differences between the low and high-risk groups. Additionally, diffusion-weighted MRI parameters, including signal intensities at different b values, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), Ktrans, and Kep, were notably associated with high-risk tumor characteristics in localized prostate cancer. Logistic regression analysis identified both standard imaging and diffusion-weighted MRI parameters as independent predictors of high-risk tumor characteristics. Furthermore, the ROC analysis demonstrated the diagnostic potential of T2WI signal intensity, signal intensity at 800 s/mm2, and ADC in identifying high-risk tumors. Joint prediction models combining standard imaging and diffusion-weighted MRI parameters showed high predictive accuracy for high-risk tumor characteristics in localized prostate cancer, with Area Under the Curve (AUC) values of 0.777 for standard imaging, 0.826 for diffusion-weighted MRI, and 0.892 for the combined model. The AUC value for the prediction model in validation set was 0.860. In conclusion, this study underscores the diagnostic potential of conventional imaging combined with diffusion-weighted MRI in identifying high-risk tumor characteristics in patients with localized prostate cancer. Both standard imaging and diffusion-weighted MRI parameters were identified as non-invasive biomarkers for risk assessment and prognosis. These findings have implications for precision treatment of localized prostate cancer, highlighting the potential integration of imaging-based risk assessment tools into clinical practice for tailored treatment strategies and improved patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
3.80%
发文量
263
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Cancer Research (AJCR) (ISSN 2156-6976), is an independent open access, online only journal to facilitate rapid dissemination of novel discoveries in basic science and treatment of cancer. It was founded by a group of scientists for cancer research and clinical academic oncologists from around the world, who are devoted to the promotion and advancement of our understanding of the cancer and its treatment. The scope of AJCR is intended to encompass that of multi-disciplinary researchers from any scientific discipline where the primary focus of the research is to increase and integrate knowledge about etiology and molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis with the ultimate aim of advancing the cure and prevention of this increasingly devastating disease. To achieve these aims AJCR will publish review articles, original articles and new techniques in cancer research and therapy. It will also publish hypothesis, case reports and letter to the editor. Unlike most other open access online journals, AJCR will keep most of the traditional features of paper print that we are all familiar with, such as continuous volume, issue numbers, as well as continuous page numbers to retain our comfortable familiarity towards an academic journal.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of risk factors affecting the prognosis of angiosarcoma patients: a retrospective study. AMP-dependent protein kinase alpha 1 predicts cancer prognosis and immunotherapy response: from pan-cancer analysis to experimental validation. Erratum: Targeting NF-κB/AP-2β signaling to enhance antitumor activity of cisplatin by melatonin in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Evodiamine exerts anti-cancer activity including growth inhibition, cell cycle arrest, and apoptosis induction in human follicular thyroid cancers. Generation and banking of patient-derived glioblastoma organoid and its application in cancer neuroscience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1