Susannah Jacob, Gabriel Gabriel, Mei Ling Yap, Shalini Vinod, Kalinda Griffiths, David Sheehan, Susan Anderson, Geoff Delaney
{"title":"2009-2018 年澳大利亚新南威尔士州患宫颈癌的土著居民和托雷斯海峡岛民妇女与非土著居民妇女在流行病学、人口学、治疗(手术和放疗)和存活率方面的比较。","authors":"Susannah Jacob, Gabriel Gabriel, Mei Ling Yap, Shalini Vinod, Kalinda Griffiths, David Sheehan, Susan Anderson, Geoff Delaney","doi":"10.1111/ajco.14140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in Australia are significantly worse than in the non-Indigenous population.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate demographic factors and treatment (surgery and radiotherapy) rates for cervical cancer and to compare these between the Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal populations to identify any differences in outcomes or modifiable treatment differences between the populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort analysis of all patients in the state of New South Wales, Australia, diagnosed with cervical cancer between 2009 and 2018 using linked registry, treatment, and death data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The crude incidence rate for cervical cancer in Aboriginal women in NSW (17.29/100,000) was more than double the rate among non-Aboriginal women (6.77/100,000). Aboriginal women were diagnosed with cervical cancer, including metastatic disease, at a younger age. There was no significant difference in presentation stage, surgery or radiotherapy treatment rates, or overall survival at 5 years between the two populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although access to cancer care looks similar as an aggregate in Aboriginal versus non-Aboriginal populations, there were disparities with reduced access to care (patients who did not receive either radiotherapy or surgery) among Aboriginal patients who were socioeconomically disadvantaged or residing in remote areas. The lower age of cancer diagnosis among Aboriginal women may have effects on survivorship, including negative effects on fertility, loss of income, and other personal, social, and economic consequences. Efforts to improve access to care, including screening, diagnosis, and treatment, should be targeted toward younger Aboriginal women and those who are socioeconomically disadvantaged or those residing in remote areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":8633,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Epidemiology, Demography, Treatment (Surgery and Radiotherapy), and Survival Between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and Non-Indigenous Women With Cervical Cancer in NSW, Australia in 2009-2018.\",\"authors\":\"Susannah Jacob, Gabriel Gabriel, Mei Ling Yap, Shalini Vinod, Kalinda Griffiths, David Sheehan, Susan Anderson, Geoff Delaney\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajco.14140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in Australia are significantly worse than in the non-Indigenous population.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate demographic factors and treatment (surgery and radiotherapy) rates for cervical cancer and to compare these between the Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal populations to identify any differences in outcomes or modifiable treatment differences between the populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort analysis of all patients in the state of New South Wales, Australia, diagnosed with cervical cancer between 2009 and 2018 using linked registry, treatment, and death data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The crude incidence rate for cervical cancer in Aboriginal women in NSW (17.29/100,000) was more than double the rate among non-Aboriginal women (6.77/100,000). Aboriginal women were diagnosed with cervical cancer, including metastatic disease, at a younger age. There was no significant difference in presentation stage, surgery or radiotherapy treatment rates, or overall survival at 5 years between the two populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although access to cancer care looks similar as an aggregate in Aboriginal versus non-Aboriginal populations, there were disparities with reduced access to care (patients who did not receive either radiotherapy or surgery) among Aboriginal patients who were socioeconomically disadvantaged or residing in remote areas. The lower age of cancer diagnosis among Aboriginal women may have effects on survivorship, including negative effects on fertility, loss of income, and other personal, social, and economic consequences. Efforts to improve access to care, including screening, diagnosis, and treatment, should be targeted toward younger Aboriginal women and those who are socioeconomically disadvantaged or those residing in remote areas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.14140\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.14140","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of Epidemiology, Demography, Treatment (Surgery and Radiotherapy), and Survival Between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and Non-Indigenous Women With Cervical Cancer in NSW, Australia in 2009-2018.
Background: Health outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in Australia are significantly worse than in the non-Indigenous population.
Aim: To evaluate demographic factors and treatment (surgery and radiotherapy) rates for cervical cancer and to compare these between the Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal populations to identify any differences in outcomes or modifiable treatment differences between the populations.
Methods: Retrospective cohort analysis of all patients in the state of New South Wales, Australia, diagnosed with cervical cancer between 2009 and 2018 using linked registry, treatment, and death data.
Results: The crude incidence rate for cervical cancer in Aboriginal women in NSW (17.29/100,000) was more than double the rate among non-Aboriginal women (6.77/100,000). Aboriginal women were diagnosed with cervical cancer, including metastatic disease, at a younger age. There was no significant difference in presentation stage, surgery or radiotherapy treatment rates, or overall survival at 5 years between the two populations.
Conclusion: Although access to cancer care looks similar as an aggregate in Aboriginal versus non-Aboriginal populations, there were disparities with reduced access to care (patients who did not receive either radiotherapy or surgery) among Aboriginal patients who were socioeconomically disadvantaged or residing in remote areas. The lower age of cancer diagnosis among Aboriginal women may have effects on survivorship, including negative effects on fertility, loss of income, and other personal, social, and economic consequences. Efforts to improve access to care, including screening, diagnosis, and treatment, should be targeted toward younger Aboriginal women and those who are socioeconomically disadvantaged or those residing in remote areas.
期刊介绍:
Asia–Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal of oncology that aims to be a forum for facilitating collaboration and exchanging information on what is happening in different countries of the Asia–Pacific region in relation to cancer treatment and care. The Journal is ideally positioned to receive publications that deal with diversity in cancer behavior, management and outcome related to ethnic, cultural, economic and other differences between populations. In addition to original articles, the Journal publishes reviews, editorials, letters to the Editor and short communications. Case reports are generally not considered for publication, only exceptional papers in which Editors find extraordinary oncological value may be considered for review. The Journal encourages clinical studies, particularly prospectively designed clinical trials.