澳大利亚肉瘤中心使用吉西他滨标准化剂量和比例以及多西他赛治疗晚期软组织肉瘤患者的实际效果。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-17 DOI:10.1111/ajco.14138
Isabella Wilson, Madeleine Strach, Vivek Bhadri, Michelle Harrison, Whiter Tang, Peter Grimison
{"title":"澳大利亚肉瘤中心使用吉西他滨标准化剂量和比例以及多西他赛治疗晚期软组织肉瘤患者的实际效果。","authors":"Isabella Wilson, Madeleine Strach, Vivek Bhadri, Michelle Harrison, Whiter Tang, Peter Grimison","doi":"10.1111/ajco.14138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gemcitabine and docetaxel (GD) is a common chemotherapy regimen for metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS). The GeDDiS trial compared GD with doxorubicin in the first-line setting, using gemcitabine 675 mg/m<sup>2</sup> over a prolonged rate of 90 min-reporting a 20% response rate and 5.4-month median progression-free survival (PFS). We aimed to examine the real-world efficacy and toxicity of GD in our center, using a standardized dose of gemcitabine 900 mg/m<sup>2</sup> over 30 min on Days 1 and 8 and intravenous docetaxel 75 mg/m<sup>2</sup> over 60 min on Day 8 every 21 days.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients with unresectable or metastatic STS receiving GD between July 2018 and October 2022. Data collected included patient and tumor characteristics, dose intensity, toxicity, response, PFS, and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-eight patients were included. Median follow-up was 19 months (range 3-30). Line of treatment (n) was first line (10), second line (13), ≥ third line (15). The median number of cycles was 6. Response rate was 42%, including 5% with a complete response. At the time of data collection, 33 patients had disease progression and 24 patients had died. PFS (median, 6-month rate) was 4.5 months and 44%. OS (median, 12-month rate) was 15 months and 65%. Grade 3/4 toxicity included anemia (21%), neutropenia (5%), thrombocytopenia (5%), and febrile neutropenia (3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These data demonstrate the activity of gemcitabine using a standardized dose and rate with docetaxel comparable to other published data and favorable toxicity in a real-life patient population despite altered gemcitabine dosing and a heavily pretreated patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":8633,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-World Outcomes of Patients Treated With Gemcitabine Using Standardized Dose and Rate and Docetaxel for Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma in an Australian Sarcoma Center.\",\"authors\":\"Isabella Wilson, Madeleine Strach, Vivek Bhadri, Michelle Harrison, Whiter Tang, Peter Grimison\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajco.14138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gemcitabine and docetaxel (GD) is a common chemotherapy regimen for metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS). The GeDDiS trial compared GD with doxorubicin in the first-line setting, using gemcitabine 675 mg/m<sup>2</sup> over a prolonged rate of 90 min-reporting a 20% response rate and 5.4-month median progression-free survival (PFS). We aimed to examine the real-world efficacy and toxicity of GD in our center, using a standardized dose of gemcitabine 900 mg/m<sup>2</sup> over 30 min on Days 1 and 8 and intravenous docetaxel 75 mg/m<sup>2</sup> over 60 min on Day 8 every 21 days.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients with unresectable or metastatic STS receiving GD between July 2018 and October 2022. Data collected included patient and tumor characteristics, dose intensity, toxicity, response, PFS, and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-eight patients were included. Median follow-up was 19 months (range 3-30). Line of treatment (n) was first line (10), second line (13), ≥ third line (15). The median number of cycles was 6. Response rate was 42%, including 5% with a complete response. At the time of data collection, 33 patients had disease progression and 24 patients had died. PFS (median, 6-month rate) was 4.5 months and 44%. OS (median, 12-month rate) was 15 months and 65%. Grade 3/4 toxicity included anemia (21%), neutropenia (5%), thrombocytopenia (5%), and febrile neutropenia (3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These data demonstrate the activity of gemcitabine using a standardized dose and rate with docetaxel comparable to other published data and favorable toxicity in a real-life patient population despite altered gemcitabine dosing and a heavily pretreated patient population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.14138\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.14138","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:吉西他滨和多西他赛(GD吉西他滨和多西他赛(GD)是治疗转移性软组织肉瘤(STS)的常用化疗方案。GeDDiS试验比较了吉西他滨与多柔比星在一线治疗中的疗效,吉西他滨的剂量为675毫克/平方米,延长时间为90分钟,报告显示反应率为20%,中位无进展生存期(PFS)为5.4个月。我们的目标是在本中心研究GD的实际疗效和毒性,采用的标准剂量为吉西他滨900 mg/m2,30分钟/天,第1天和第8天;静脉注射多西他赛75 mg/m2,60分钟/天,第8天,每21天一次:对2018年7月至2022年10月期间接受GD治疗的不可切除或转移性STS患者进行回顾性分析。收集的数据包括患者和肿瘤特征、剂量强度、毒性、反应、PFS和总生存期(OS):共纳入 38 名患者。中位随访时间为 19 个月(3-30 个月)。治疗线(n)为一线(10)、二线(13)、≥三线(15)。应答率为42%,其中5%为完全应答。在收集数据时,33 名患者疾病进展,24 名患者死亡。PFS(中位数,6 个月)为 4.5 个月,占 44%。OS(中位数,12个月)为15个月,占65%。3/4级毒性包括贫血(21%)、中性粒细胞减少(5%)、血小板减少(5%)和发热性中性粒细胞减少(3%):这些数据表明,尽管吉西他滨的剂量发生了改变,而且患者的预处理程度较高,但在现实生活中,吉西他滨与多西他赛的标准化剂量和比例具有与其他已发表数据相当的活性和良好的毒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Real-World Outcomes of Patients Treated With Gemcitabine Using Standardized Dose and Rate and Docetaxel for Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma in an Australian Sarcoma Center.

Background: Gemcitabine and docetaxel (GD) is a common chemotherapy regimen for metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS). The GeDDiS trial compared GD with doxorubicin in the first-line setting, using gemcitabine 675 mg/m2 over a prolonged rate of 90 min-reporting a 20% response rate and 5.4-month median progression-free survival (PFS). We aimed to examine the real-world efficacy and toxicity of GD in our center, using a standardized dose of gemcitabine 900 mg/m2 over 30 min on Days 1 and 8 and intravenous docetaxel 75 mg/m2 over 60 min on Day 8 every 21 days.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients with unresectable or metastatic STS receiving GD between July 2018 and October 2022. Data collected included patient and tumor characteristics, dose intensity, toxicity, response, PFS, and overall survival (OS).

Results: Thirty-eight patients were included. Median follow-up was 19 months (range 3-30). Line of treatment (n) was first line (10), second line (13), ≥ third line (15). The median number of cycles was 6. Response rate was 42%, including 5% with a complete response. At the time of data collection, 33 patients had disease progression and 24 patients had died. PFS (median, 6-month rate) was 4.5 months and 44%. OS (median, 12-month rate) was 15 months and 65%. Grade 3/4 toxicity included anemia (21%), neutropenia (5%), thrombocytopenia (5%), and febrile neutropenia (3%).

Conclusion: These data demonstrate the activity of gemcitabine using a standardized dose and rate with docetaxel comparable to other published data and favorable toxicity in a real-life patient population despite altered gemcitabine dosing and a heavily pretreated patient population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Asia–Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal of oncology that aims to be a forum for facilitating collaboration and exchanging information on what is happening in different countries of the Asia–Pacific region in relation to cancer treatment and care. The Journal is ideally positioned to receive publications that deal with diversity in cancer behavior, management and outcome related to ethnic, cultural, economic and other differences between populations. In addition to original articles, the Journal publishes reviews, editorials, letters to the Editor and short communications. Case reports are generally not considered for publication, only exceptional papers in which Editors find extraordinary oncological value may be considered for review. The Journal encourages clinical studies, particularly prospectively designed clinical trials.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Antibiotics and Chronic Medications on Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma. The Case for Shared Decision-making in Oncology and Why the Philippine Healthcare System is Primed for It. Berberine and Lung Cancer: From Pure Form to Its Nanoformulations. Comparison of Epidemiology, Demography, Treatment (Surgery and Radiotherapy), and Survival Between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and Non-Indigenous Women With Cervical Cancer in NSW, Australia in 2009-2018. Real-World Outcomes of Patients Treated With Gemcitabine Using Standardized Dose and Rate and Docetaxel for Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma in an Australian Sarcoma Center.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1