Grace Keegan , John-Ross Rizzo , Megan A. Morris , Kathie-Ann Joseph
{"title":"合理便利的重要性:范围审查揭示了盲人和低视力患者护理方面的差距。","authors":"Grace Keegan , John-Ross Rizzo , Megan A. Morris , Kathie-Ann Joseph","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Health and healthcare disparities for surgical patients with blindness and low vision (pBLV) stem from inaccessible healthcare systems that lack universal design principles or, at a minimum, reasonable accommodations (RA).</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We aimed to identify barriers to developing and implementing RAs in the surgical setting and provide a review of best practices for providing RAs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a search of PubMed for evidence of reasonable accommodations, or lack thereof, in the surgical setting. Articles related to gaps and barriers to providing RAs for pBLV or best practices for supporting RAs were reviewed for the study.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Barriers to the implementation of reasonable accommodations, and, accordingly, best practices for achieving equity for pBLV, relate to policies and systems, staff knowledge and attitudes, and materials and technology.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These inequities for pBLV require comprehensive frameworks that offer, maintain, and support education about disability disparities and RAs in the surgical field. Providing RAs for surgical pBLV, and all patients with disabilities is an important and impactful step towards creating a more equitable and anti-ableist health system.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"241 ","pages":"Article 116085"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The criticality of reasonable accommodations: A scoping review revealing gaps in care for patients with blindness and low vision\",\"authors\":\"Grace Keegan , John-Ross Rizzo , Megan A. Morris , Kathie-Ann Joseph\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Health and healthcare disparities for surgical patients with blindness and low vision (pBLV) stem from inaccessible healthcare systems that lack universal design principles or, at a minimum, reasonable accommodations (RA).</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We aimed to identify barriers to developing and implementing RAs in the surgical setting and provide a review of best practices for providing RAs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a search of PubMed for evidence of reasonable accommodations, or lack thereof, in the surgical setting. Articles related to gaps and barriers to providing RAs for pBLV or best practices for supporting RAs were reviewed for the study.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Barriers to the implementation of reasonable accommodations, and, accordingly, best practices for achieving equity for pBLV, relate to policies and systems, staff knowledge and attitudes, and materials and technology.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These inequities for pBLV require comprehensive frameworks that offer, maintain, and support education about disability disparities and RAs in the surgical field. Providing RAs for surgical pBLV, and all patients with disabilities is an important and impactful step towards creating a more equitable and anti-ableist health system.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of surgery\",\"volume\":\"241 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116085\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961024006378\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961024006378","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The criticality of reasonable accommodations: A scoping review revealing gaps in care for patients with blindness and low vision
Background
Health and healthcare disparities for surgical patients with blindness and low vision (pBLV) stem from inaccessible healthcare systems that lack universal design principles or, at a minimum, reasonable accommodations (RA).
Objectives
We aimed to identify barriers to developing and implementing RAs in the surgical setting and provide a review of best practices for providing RAs.
Methods
We conducted a search of PubMed for evidence of reasonable accommodations, or lack thereof, in the surgical setting. Articles related to gaps and barriers to providing RAs for pBLV or best practices for supporting RAs were reviewed for the study.
Results
Barriers to the implementation of reasonable accommodations, and, accordingly, best practices for achieving equity for pBLV, relate to policies and systems, staff knowledge and attitudes, and materials and technology.
Conclusions
These inequities for pBLV require comprehensive frameworks that offer, maintain, and support education about disability disparities and RAs in the surgical field. Providing RAs for surgical pBLV, and all patients with disabilities is an important and impactful step towards creating a more equitable and anti-ableist health system.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.