Matteo Foschi, Raffaele Ornello, Lucio D'Anna, Eleonora De Matteis, Federico De Santis, Valentina Barone, Marilina Viola, Maria Giulia Mosconi, Diletta Rosin, Michele Romoli, Tiziana Tassinari, Silvia Cenciarelli, Bruno Censori, Marialuisa Zedde, Marina Diomedi, Marco Petruzzellis, Vincenzo Inchingolo, Manuel Cappellari, Paolo Candelaresi, Alessandra Bavaro, Anna Cavallini, Maria Grazia Piscaglia, Valeria Terruso, Alessandro Pezzini, Giovanni Frisullo, Francesco Muscia, Andrea Zini, Ruggiero Leone, Carmela Palmieri, Letizia Maria Cupini, Michela Marcon, Rossana Tassi, Enzo Sanzaro, Giulio Papiri, Giovanni Viticchi, Daniele Orsucci, Anne Falcou, Susanna Diamanti, Roberto Tarletti, Patrizia Nencini, Eugenia Rota, Federica Nicoletta Sepe, Luigi Caputi, Gino Volpi, Salvatore La Spada, Mario Beccia, Vincenzo Mastrangelo, Paolo Invernizzi, Giuseppe Pelliccioni, Maria Vittoria De Angelis, Laura Bonanni, Giampietro Ruzza, Emanuele Alessandro Caggia, Monia Russo, Agnese Tonon, Maria Cristina Acciarri, Sabrina Anticoli, Cinzia Roberti, Gaspare Scaglione, Francesca Pistoia, Chiara Alessi, Antonella De Boni, Alessandra Sanna, Alberto Chiti, Leonardo Barbarini, Maela Masato, Massimo Del Sette, Francesco Passarelli, Maria Roberta Bongioanni, Manuela De Michele, Stefano Ricci, Mariarosaria Valente, Gian Luigi Gigli, Giovanni Merlino, Maurizio Paciaroni, Maria Guarino, Simona Sacco
{"title":"非心肌栓塞轻度至中度缺血性卒中患者双联抗血小板治疗与单联抗血小板治疗的真实世界比较：倾向匹配分析。","authors":"Matteo Foschi, Raffaele Ornello, Lucio D'Anna, Eleonora De Matteis, Federico De Santis, Valentina Barone, Marilina Viola, Maria Giulia Mosconi, Diletta Rosin, Michele Romoli, Tiziana Tassinari, Silvia Cenciarelli, Bruno Censori, Marialuisa Zedde, Marina Diomedi, Marco Petruzzellis, Vincenzo Inchingolo, Manuel Cappellari, Paolo Candelaresi, Alessandra Bavaro, Anna Cavallini, Maria Grazia Piscaglia, Valeria Terruso, Alessandro Pezzini, Giovanni Frisullo, Francesco Muscia, Andrea Zini, Ruggiero Leone, Carmela Palmieri, Letizia Maria Cupini, Michela Marcon, Rossana Tassi, Enzo Sanzaro, Giulio Papiri, Giovanni Viticchi, Daniele Orsucci, Anne Falcou, Susanna Diamanti, Roberto Tarletti, Patrizia Nencini, Eugenia Rota, Federica Nicoletta Sepe, Luigi Caputi, Gino Volpi, Salvatore La Spada, Mario Beccia, Vincenzo Mastrangelo, Paolo Invernizzi, Giuseppe Pelliccioni, Maria Vittoria De Angelis, Laura Bonanni, Giampietro Ruzza, Emanuele Alessandro Caggia, Monia Russo, Agnese Tonon, Maria Cristina Acciarri, Sabrina Anticoli, Cinzia Roberti, Gaspare Scaglione, Francesca Pistoia, Chiara Alessi, Antonella De Boni, Alessandra Sanna, Alberto Chiti, Leonardo Barbarini, Maela Masato, Massimo Del Sette, Francesco Passarelli, Maria Roberta Bongioanni, Manuela De Michele, Stefano Ricci, Mariarosaria Valente, Gian Luigi Gigli, Giovanni Merlino, Maurizio Paciaroni, Maria Guarino, Simona Sacco","doi":"10.1177/17474930241302991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Short-term dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) is superior to single antiplatelet treatment (SAPT) for secondary prevention in non-cardioembolic minor ischemic stroke and high-risk TIA. As the real-world use of DAPT is broader than in trials, it is important to clarify its benefit/risk profile in a diverse population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Post-hoc analysis of prospectively collected data from the READAPT cohort and 3 prospective stroke registries including patients with mild-to-moderate (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score 0-10) ischemic stroke receiving early DAPT or SAPT. The primary effectiveness outcome was 90-day return to pre-stroke neurological functioning using modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. Secondary effectiveness outcomes were 90-day mRS shift, new ischemic stroke/TIA, vascular and all-cause death, 24-h early neurological improvement or deterioration. The safety outcome was 90-day intracranial hemorrhage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We matched 1008 patients treated with DAPT and 1008 treated with SAPT. Compared to SAPT, patients treated with DAPT showed higher likelihood of 90-day primary effectiveness outcome (87.5% versus 84.4%, risk difference 3.1% [95%CI 0.1%-6.1%];p=0.047, risk ratio 1.03 [95%CI 1.01-1.07];p=0.043) and higher rate of 24-h early neurological improvement (25.3% versus 15.4%, risk difference 9.9% [95%CI 6.4%-13.4%];p<0.001, risk ratio 1.65 [95%CI 1.37-1.97];p<0.001). No differences were observed for other study outcomes. Subgroup analysis confirmed benefit of DAPT over SAPT for primary effectiveness outcome in patients with moderate stroke, those treated with intravenous thrombolysis and who received antiplatelet loading dose.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that DAPT use might be safe and more effective than SAPT even in the real-world and in patients who do not strictly fulfill criteria of landmark large clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":14442,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Stroke","volume":" ","pages":"17474930241302991"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world comparison of dual versus single antiplatelet treatment in patients with non-cardioembolic mild-to-moderate ischemic stroke: a propensity matched analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Matteo Foschi, Raffaele Ornello, Lucio D'Anna, Eleonora De Matteis, Federico De Santis, Valentina Barone, Marilina Viola, Maria Giulia Mosconi, Diletta Rosin, Michele Romoli, Tiziana Tassinari, Silvia Cenciarelli, Bruno Censori, Marialuisa Zedde, Marina Diomedi, Marco Petruzzellis, Vincenzo Inchingolo, Manuel Cappellari, Paolo Candelaresi, Alessandra Bavaro, Anna Cavallini, Maria Grazia Piscaglia, Valeria Terruso, Alessandro Pezzini, Giovanni Frisullo, Francesco Muscia, Andrea Zini, Ruggiero Leone, Carmela Palmieri, Letizia Maria Cupini, Michela Marcon, Rossana Tassi, Enzo Sanzaro, Giulio Papiri, Giovanni Viticchi, Daniele Orsucci, Anne Falcou, Susanna Diamanti, Roberto Tarletti, Patrizia Nencini, Eugenia Rota, Federica Nicoletta Sepe, Luigi Caputi, Gino Volpi, Salvatore La Spada, Mario Beccia, Vincenzo Mastrangelo, Paolo Invernizzi, Giuseppe Pelliccioni, Maria Vittoria De Angelis, Laura Bonanni, Giampietro Ruzza, Emanuele Alessandro Caggia, Monia Russo, Agnese Tonon, Maria Cristina Acciarri, Sabrina Anticoli, Cinzia Roberti, Gaspare Scaglione, Francesca Pistoia, Chiara Alessi, Antonella De Boni, Alessandra Sanna, Alberto Chiti, Leonardo Barbarini, Maela Masato, Massimo Del Sette, Francesco Passarelli, Maria Roberta Bongioanni, Manuela De Michele, Stefano Ricci, Mariarosaria Valente, Gian Luigi Gigli, Giovanni Merlino, Maurizio Paciaroni, Maria Guarino, Simona Sacco\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17474930241302991\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Short-term dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) is superior to single antiplatelet treatment (SAPT) for secondary prevention in non-cardioembolic minor ischemic stroke and high-risk TIA. As the real-world use of DAPT is broader than in trials, it is important to clarify its benefit/risk profile in a diverse population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Post-hoc analysis of prospectively collected data from the READAPT cohort and 3 prospective stroke registries including patients with mild-to-moderate (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score 0-10) ischemic stroke receiving early DAPT or SAPT. The primary effectiveness outcome was 90-day return to pre-stroke neurological functioning using modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. Secondary effectiveness outcomes were 90-day mRS shift, new ischemic stroke/TIA, vascular and all-cause death, 24-h early neurological improvement or deterioration. The safety outcome was 90-day intracranial hemorrhage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We matched 1008 patients treated with DAPT and 1008 treated with SAPT. Compared to SAPT, patients treated with DAPT showed higher likelihood of 90-day primary effectiveness outcome (87.5% versus 84.4%, risk difference 3.1% [95%CI 0.1%-6.1%];p=0.047, risk ratio 1.03 [95%CI 1.01-1.07];p=0.043) and higher rate of 24-h early neurological improvement (25.3% versus 15.4%, risk difference 9.9% [95%CI 6.4%-13.4%];p<0.001, risk ratio 1.65 [95%CI 1.37-1.97];p<0.001). No differences were observed for other study outcomes. Subgroup analysis confirmed benefit of DAPT over SAPT for primary effectiveness outcome in patients with moderate stroke, those treated with intravenous thrombolysis and who received antiplatelet loading dose.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that DAPT use might be safe and more effective than SAPT even in the real-world and in patients who do not strictly fulfill criteria of landmark large clinical trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Stroke\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17474930241302991\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Stroke\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930241302991\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930241302991","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Real-world comparison of dual versus single antiplatelet treatment in patients with non-cardioembolic mild-to-moderate ischemic stroke: a propensity matched analysis.
Background: Short-term dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) is superior to single antiplatelet treatment (SAPT) for secondary prevention in non-cardioembolic minor ischemic stroke and high-risk TIA. As the real-world use of DAPT is broader than in trials, it is important to clarify its benefit/risk profile in a diverse population.
Methods: Post-hoc analysis of prospectively collected data from the READAPT cohort and 3 prospective stroke registries including patients with mild-to-moderate (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score 0-10) ischemic stroke receiving early DAPT or SAPT. The primary effectiveness outcome was 90-day return to pre-stroke neurological functioning using modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. Secondary effectiveness outcomes were 90-day mRS shift, new ischemic stroke/TIA, vascular and all-cause death, 24-h early neurological improvement or deterioration. The safety outcome was 90-day intracranial hemorrhage.
Results: We matched 1008 patients treated with DAPT and 1008 treated with SAPT. Compared to SAPT, patients treated with DAPT showed higher likelihood of 90-day primary effectiveness outcome (87.5% versus 84.4%, risk difference 3.1% [95%CI 0.1%-6.1%];p=0.047, risk ratio 1.03 [95%CI 1.01-1.07];p=0.043) and higher rate of 24-h early neurological improvement (25.3% versus 15.4%, risk difference 9.9% [95%CI 6.4%-13.4%];p<0.001, risk ratio 1.65 [95%CI 1.37-1.97];p<0.001). No differences were observed for other study outcomes. Subgroup analysis confirmed benefit of DAPT over SAPT for primary effectiveness outcome in patients with moderate stroke, those treated with intravenous thrombolysis and who received antiplatelet loading dose.
Conclusions: Our findings suggest that DAPT use might be safe and more effective than SAPT even in the real-world and in patients who do not strictly fulfill criteria of landmark large clinical trials.
期刊介绍：
The International Journal of Stroke is a welcome addition to the international stroke journal landscape in that it concentrates on the clinical aspects of stroke with basic science contributions in areas of clinical interest. Reviews of current topics are broadly based to encompass not only recent advances of global interest but also those which may be more important in certain regions and the journal regularly features items of news interest from all parts of the world. To facilitate the international nature of the journal, our Associate Editors from Europe, Asia, North America and South America coordinate segments of the journal.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
