推进以患者为中心的心脏移植指标:存活天数和医院外天数的作用。

IF 6.4 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1016/j.healun.2024.11.005
J'undra N Pegues, Reem M Fawaz, Kinka M Kimfon, Hechuan Hou, Pierre-Emmanuel Noly, Thomas M Cascino, Robert B Hawkins, James W Stewart Ii, Keith Aaronson, Jennifer Cowger, Francis D Pagani, Donald S Likosky
{"title":"推进以患者为中心的心脏移植指标:存活天数和医院外天数的作用。","authors":"J'undra N Pegues, Reem M Fawaz, Kinka M Kimfon, Hechuan Hou, Pierre-Emmanuel Noly, Thomas M Cascino, Robert B Hawkins, James W Stewart Ii, Keith Aaronson, Jennifer Cowger, Francis D Pagani, Donald S Likosky","doi":"10.1016/j.healun.2024.11.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heart transplantation (HT) survival and waitlist times are established outcome metrics. Patient-centered HT outcomes are insufficiently characterized. This study evaluates the role of days alive and outside the hospital (DAOH) as a candidate patient-centered HT performance measure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study cohort included Medicare beneficiaries undergoing HT (July 2008-December 2017). The percent of days outside of hospital (%DOH) six months before (%DOH-BF) and percent of days alive outside of hospital 12 months after HT (%DAOH-AF) were evaluated along with adverse events (AEs, early: ≤3 months; late: 4-12 months). Patients were stratified by patient %DAOH-AF terciles. Risk-adjusted %DAOH was evaluated across hospitals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5,104 beneficiaries underwent HT across 108 hospitals. Median [IQR] age was 62 [53-67] years, 23.9% were female, and 21.4% were African-American. The overall median %DOAH-AF was 92.9% [83.8%, 95.9%], varying by tercile: low: 71.8% [4.9%, 83.6%], intermediate; 92.9% [91%, 94%]; high 96.4% [95.9%, 97.3%]. The lowest (versus highest) tercile %DAOH-AF had a lower median %DOH-BF (88% [73%-97%] versus 92% [81%-98%]) and longer post-HT inpatient stay (54 [36-81] versus 13 [10-15] days). After HT, the lowest versus highest tercile had greater AEs burden in the early [allograft failure (16.1% versus 1.6%), stroke (12.1% versus 2.3%)], and late [stroke (5.1% versus 1.9%), sternal wound infection (5.0% versus 0.8%)] phases post-HT. Mean hospital %DAOH<sub>adj</sub> was 80.5% (min:max 57.7%-96.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Post-HT %DAOH varies across beneficiaries and hospitals and is associated with AEs. Further research is warranted to assess the role and validity of %DAOH as a HT quality metric.</p>","PeriodicalId":15900,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancing Patient-Centered Metrics for Heart Transplantation: The Role of Days Alive and Outside the Hospital.\",\"authors\":\"J'undra N Pegues, Reem M Fawaz, Kinka M Kimfon, Hechuan Hou, Pierre-Emmanuel Noly, Thomas M Cascino, Robert B Hawkins, James W Stewart Ii, Keith Aaronson, Jennifer Cowger, Francis D Pagani, Donald S Likosky\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.healun.2024.11.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heart transplantation (HT) survival and waitlist times are established outcome metrics. Patient-centered HT outcomes are insufficiently characterized. This study evaluates the role of days alive and outside the hospital (DAOH) as a candidate patient-centered HT performance measure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study cohort included Medicare beneficiaries undergoing HT (July 2008-December 2017). The percent of days outside of hospital (%DOH) six months before (%DOH-BF) and percent of days alive outside of hospital 12 months after HT (%DAOH-AF) were evaluated along with adverse events (AEs, early: ≤3 months; late: 4-12 months). Patients were stratified by patient %DAOH-AF terciles. Risk-adjusted %DAOH was evaluated across hospitals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5,104 beneficiaries underwent HT across 108 hospitals. Median [IQR] age was 62 [53-67] years, 23.9% were female, and 21.4% were African-American. The overall median %DOAH-AF was 92.9% [83.8%, 95.9%], varying by tercile: low: 71.8% [4.9%, 83.6%], intermediate; 92.9% [91%, 94%]; high 96.4% [95.9%, 97.3%]. The lowest (versus highest) tercile %DAOH-AF had a lower median %DOH-BF (88% [73%-97%] versus 92% [81%-98%]) and longer post-HT inpatient stay (54 [36-81] versus 13 [10-15] days). After HT, the lowest versus highest tercile had greater AEs burden in the early [allograft failure (16.1% versus 1.6%), stroke (12.1% versus 2.3%)], and late [stroke (5.1% versus 1.9%), sternal wound infection (5.0% versus 0.8%)] phases post-HT. Mean hospital %DAOH<sub>adj</sub> was 80.5% (min:max 57.7%-96.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Post-HT %DAOH varies across beneficiaries and hospitals and is associated with AEs. Further research is warranted to assess the role and validity of %DAOH as a HT quality metric.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15900,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2024.11.005\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2024.11.005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心脏移植(HT)的存活率和等待时间是既定的结果指标。而以患者为中心的心脏移植结果却没有得到充分描述。本研究评估了院外存活天数(DAOH)作为以患者为中心的心脏移植候选绩效指标的作用:研究队列包括接受 HT 的医疗保险受益人(2008 年 7 月至 2017 年 12 月)。研究人员评估了 HT 前 6 个月的院外生存天数百分比(%DOH)(%DOH-BF)和 HT 后 12 个月的院外生存天数百分比(%DAOH-AF)以及不良事件(AEs,早期:≤3 个月;晚期:4-12 个月)。根据患者的 %DAOH-AF terciles 对患者进行分层。对各医院的风险调整%DAOH进行了评估:结果:108家医院共有5104名受益者接受了高温治疗。中位数[IQR]年龄为62 [53-67]岁,23.9%为女性,21.4%为非裔美国人。总的 DOAH-AF % 中位数为 92.9% [83.8%, 95.9%],各等级之间存在差异:低:71.8% [4.9%, 83.6%];中:92.9% [91%, 94%];高:96.4% [95.9%, 97.3%]。DAOH-AF%最低(与最高)的三等分组的中位数DOH-BF%较低(88% [73%-97%] 与 92% [81%-98%]),HT后住院时间较长(54 [36-81] 与 13 [10-15]天)。HT后,在HT后早期[异体移植失败(16.1%对1.6%)、中风(12.1%对2.3%)]和晚期[中风(5.1%对1.9%)、胸骨伤口感染(5.0%对0.8%)],AEs负担最低的三组与最高的三组相比更大。平均住院%DAOHadj为80.5%(最小值:最大值为57.7%-96.7%):结论:HT 后的 %DAOH 因受益人和医院而异,并与 AEs 相关。有必要开展进一步研究,以评估作为 HT 质量指标的 %DAOH 的作用和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Advancing Patient-Centered Metrics for Heart Transplantation: The Role of Days Alive and Outside the Hospital.

Background: Heart transplantation (HT) survival and waitlist times are established outcome metrics. Patient-centered HT outcomes are insufficiently characterized. This study evaluates the role of days alive and outside the hospital (DAOH) as a candidate patient-centered HT performance measure.

Methods: The study cohort included Medicare beneficiaries undergoing HT (July 2008-December 2017). The percent of days outside of hospital (%DOH) six months before (%DOH-BF) and percent of days alive outside of hospital 12 months after HT (%DAOH-AF) were evaluated along with adverse events (AEs, early: ≤3 months; late: 4-12 months). Patients were stratified by patient %DAOH-AF terciles. Risk-adjusted %DAOH was evaluated across hospitals.

Results: A total of 5,104 beneficiaries underwent HT across 108 hospitals. Median [IQR] age was 62 [53-67] years, 23.9% were female, and 21.4% were African-American. The overall median %DOAH-AF was 92.9% [83.8%, 95.9%], varying by tercile: low: 71.8% [4.9%, 83.6%], intermediate; 92.9% [91%, 94%]; high 96.4% [95.9%, 97.3%]. The lowest (versus highest) tercile %DAOH-AF had a lower median %DOH-BF (88% [73%-97%] versus 92% [81%-98%]) and longer post-HT inpatient stay (54 [36-81] versus 13 [10-15] days). After HT, the lowest versus highest tercile had greater AEs burden in the early [allograft failure (16.1% versus 1.6%), stroke (12.1% versus 2.3%)], and late [stroke (5.1% versus 1.9%), sternal wound infection (5.0% versus 0.8%)] phases post-HT. Mean hospital %DAOHadj was 80.5% (min:max 57.7%-96.7%).

Conclusions: Post-HT %DAOH varies across beneficiaries and hospitals and is associated with AEs. Further research is warranted to assess the role and validity of %DAOH as a HT quality metric.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1667
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, the official publication of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation, brings readers essential scholarly and timely information in the field of cardio-pulmonary transplantation, mechanical and biological support of the failing heart, advanced lung disease (including pulmonary vascular disease) and cell replacement therapy. Importantly, the journal also serves as a medium of communication of pre-clinical sciences in all these rapidly expanding areas.
期刊最新文献
Lung Allograft Dysbiosis Associates with Immune Response and Primary Graft Dysfunction. Peak VO2: An Old-School Prognostic Metric for All Heart Failure Seasons. Therapeutic Plasma Exchange is Associated with Increased Survival in Heart Transplant Recipients Experiencing Severe Primary Graft Dysfunction. Can sinoatrial reinnervation improve survival after heart transplantation? Advancing Patient-Centered Metrics for Heart Transplantation: The Role of Days Alive and Outside the Hospital.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1