Joshua Carroll MD , Robert J. Behm MD , Zachary E. Dewar MD , Gregory Christiansen DO , Bryant Morocho MD , Kelly Roach DO , Ronel Ankam , Steven L. Casos MD
{"title":"从麻醉科过渡到急诊科,对农村创伤患者进行气道管理。","authors":"Joshua Carroll MD , Robert J. Behm MD , Zachary E. Dewar MD , Gregory Christiansen DO , Bryant Morocho MD , Kelly Roach DO , Ronel Ankam , Steven L. Casos MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2024.10.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>When our rural trauma center first became certified in 1986, the Emergency Department (ED) was a mix of board-certified Emergency Medicine (EM) and Family Medicine trained physicians each with various degrees of airway experience. Therefore, Anesthesia providers had provided airway management during trauma activations for decades. Recently, our institution saw dramatic growth in the ED which is now staffed by board certified EM physicians and complemented by an EM residency program. This prompted the institution to enact a policy change transitioning airway management during trauma activations from Anesthesiology to EM. The authors hypothesized that this policy change was not associated with a reduced rate of successful first pass intubations in trauma patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective analysis was performed of all trauma activations requiring intubation from March 1, 2018, to January 31, 2023. The ED assumed responsibility for airway management March 1, 2021. These patients were then divided into two groups; the pregroup, representing airways managed by Anesthesiology, and the postgroup representing airways managed by EM. The primary outcome was the rate of successful intubation performed on the first pass. Secondary outcomes included periprocedural vital signs and presence of airway management associated complication.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The pregroup included 71 patients while the postgroup included 58 patients with full documentation meeting our criteria. We found no difference in the rate of successful first pass intubations between the pregroup and postgroup (85.90% <em>versus</em> 87.9%, <em>P</em> = 0.736). Both groups had 100% intubation success rates on the second pass. There were no significant differences between groups across the majority of secondary outcomes measured.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The transition in airway management of the trauma patient from anesthesiology to the ED in a rural Level II trauma center found no difference regarding successful first pass intubations in the trauma bay.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"304 ","pages":"Pages 207-211"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transitioning From Anesthesia to Emergency Medicine for Airway Management in Rural Trauma Patients\",\"authors\":\"Joshua Carroll MD , Robert J. Behm MD , Zachary E. Dewar MD , Gregory Christiansen DO , Bryant Morocho MD , Kelly Roach DO , Ronel Ankam , Steven L. Casos MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jss.2024.10.023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>When our rural trauma center first became certified in 1986, the Emergency Department (ED) was a mix of board-certified Emergency Medicine (EM) and Family Medicine trained physicians each with various degrees of airway experience. Therefore, Anesthesia providers had provided airway management during trauma activations for decades. Recently, our institution saw dramatic growth in the ED which is now staffed by board certified EM physicians and complemented by an EM residency program. This prompted the institution to enact a policy change transitioning airway management during trauma activations from Anesthesiology to EM. The authors hypothesized that this policy change was not associated with a reduced rate of successful first pass intubations in trauma patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective analysis was performed of all trauma activations requiring intubation from March 1, 2018, to January 31, 2023. The ED assumed responsibility for airway management March 1, 2021. These patients were then divided into two groups; the pregroup, representing airways managed by Anesthesiology, and the postgroup representing airways managed by EM. The primary outcome was the rate of successful intubation performed on the first pass. Secondary outcomes included periprocedural vital signs and presence of airway management associated complication.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The pregroup included 71 patients while the postgroup included 58 patients with full documentation meeting our criteria. We found no difference in the rate of successful first pass intubations between the pregroup and postgroup (85.90% <em>versus</em> 87.9%, <em>P</em> = 0.736). Both groups had 100% intubation success rates on the second pass. There were no significant differences between groups across the majority of secondary outcomes measured.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The transition in airway management of the trauma patient from anesthesiology to the ED in a rural Level II trauma center found no difference regarding successful first pass intubations in the trauma bay.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Research\",\"volume\":\"304 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 207-211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480424006760\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480424006760","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Transitioning From Anesthesia to Emergency Medicine for Airway Management in Rural Trauma Patients
Introduction
When our rural trauma center first became certified in 1986, the Emergency Department (ED) was a mix of board-certified Emergency Medicine (EM) and Family Medicine trained physicians each with various degrees of airway experience. Therefore, Anesthesia providers had provided airway management during trauma activations for decades. Recently, our institution saw dramatic growth in the ED which is now staffed by board certified EM physicians and complemented by an EM residency program. This prompted the institution to enact a policy change transitioning airway management during trauma activations from Anesthesiology to EM. The authors hypothesized that this policy change was not associated with a reduced rate of successful first pass intubations in trauma patients.
Methods
A retrospective analysis was performed of all trauma activations requiring intubation from March 1, 2018, to January 31, 2023. The ED assumed responsibility for airway management March 1, 2021. These patients were then divided into two groups; the pregroup, representing airways managed by Anesthesiology, and the postgroup representing airways managed by EM. The primary outcome was the rate of successful intubation performed on the first pass. Secondary outcomes included periprocedural vital signs and presence of airway management associated complication.
Results
The pregroup included 71 patients while the postgroup included 58 patients with full documentation meeting our criteria. We found no difference in the rate of successful first pass intubations between the pregroup and postgroup (85.90% versus 87.9%, P = 0.736). Both groups had 100% intubation success rates on the second pass. There were no significant differences between groups across the majority of secondary outcomes measured.
Conclusions
The transition in airway management of the trauma patient from anesthesiology to the ED in a rural Level II trauma center found no difference regarding successful first pass intubations in the trauma bay.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories.
The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.