Bart Christiaan Hameete, Torsten Plösch, Astrid Hogenkamp, Lucianne Groenink
{"title":"滋养细胞对免疫诱因反应的体外研究的系统回顾和偏倚风险分析。","authors":"Bart Christiaan Hameete, Torsten Plösch, Astrid Hogenkamp, Lucianne Groenink","doi":"10.1016/j.placenta.2024.10.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An increasing amount of evidence suggests that immune responses may affect trophoblast functioning, which in turn may play a role in gestational disorders and fetal development. This systematic review offers the first summary of in vitro studies on the trophoblast response to immunological triggers, in conjunction with a risk of bias analysis. A search in Pubmed and Embase yielded 110 relevant studies. Primary trophoblasts were the most commonly used cell type, but trophoblast subtypes were not always defined. Similarly, the exact natures of trophoblast cell lines were sometimes unclear. Cytokines and Toll-like receptor agonists were often used as interventions, but most studies focused on a select few substances such as tumor necrosis factor-α and lipopolysaccharide. In regard to the outcome parameters, some important trophoblast functions, such as hormone production and barrier formation were underrepresented. Whether or not risk of bias was high varied strongly between types of bias. Risk of selection bias, for example, was usually low. However, none of the included studies mentioned blinding or plate randomization. Only a select few studies mentioned passage numbers, use of vehicle control or conflict of interest. In conclusion, better characterization of trophoblast subtypes and a broader range of studied interventions and outcome parameters would contribute to a more complete understanding of trophoblast responses to immune stimuli. Additionally, researchers are encouraged to replicate experiments and pay close attention when setting up and writing down methodologies, in order to improve the reproducibility and translatability of their work.</p>","PeriodicalId":20203,"journal":{"name":"Placenta","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review and risk of bias analysis of in vitro studies on trophoblast response to immunological triggers.\",\"authors\":\"Bart Christiaan Hameete, Torsten Plösch, Astrid Hogenkamp, Lucianne Groenink\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.placenta.2024.10.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>An increasing amount of evidence suggests that immune responses may affect trophoblast functioning, which in turn may play a role in gestational disorders and fetal development. This systematic review offers the first summary of in vitro studies on the trophoblast response to immunological triggers, in conjunction with a risk of bias analysis. A search in Pubmed and Embase yielded 110 relevant studies. Primary trophoblasts were the most commonly used cell type, but trophoblast subtypes were not always defined. Similarly, the exact natures of trophoblast cell lines were sometimes unclear. Cytokines and Toll-like receptor agonists were often used as interventions, but most studies focused on a select few substances such as tumor necrosis factor-α and lipopolysaccharide. In regard to the outcome parameters, some important trophoblast functions, such as hormone production and barrier formation were underrepresented. Whether or not risk of bias was high varied strongly between types of bias. Risk of selection bias, for example, was usually low. However, none of the included studies mentioned blinding or plate randomization. Only a select few studies mentioned passage numbers, use of vehicle control or conflict of interest. In conclusion, better characterization of trophoblast subtypes and a broader range of studied interventions and outcome parameters would contribute to a more complete understanding of trophoblast responses to immune stimuli. Additionally, researchers are encouraged to replicate experiments and pay close attention when setting up and writing down methodologies, in order to improve the reproducibility and translatability of their work.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Placenta\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Placenta\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2024.10.010\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Placenta","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2024.10.010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A systematic review and risk of bias analysis of in vitro studies on trophoblast response to immunological triggers.
An increasing amount of evidence suggests that immune responses may affect trophoblast functioning, which in turn may play a role in gestational disorders and fetal development. This systematic review offers the first summary of in vitro studies on the trophoblast response to immunological triggers, in conjunction with a risk of bias analysis. A search in Pubmed and Embase yielded 110 relevant studies. Primary trophoblasts were the most commonly used cell type, but trophoblast subtypes were not always defined. Similarly, the exact natures of trophoblast cell lines were sometimes unclear. Cytokines and Toll-like receptor agonists were often used as interventions, but most studies focused on a select few substances such as tumor necrosis factor-α and lipopolysaccharide. In regard to the outcome parameters, some important trophoblast functions, such as hormone production and barrier formation were underrepresented. Whether or not risk of bias was high varied strongly between types of bias. Risk of selection bias, for example, was usually low. However, none of the included studies mentioned blinding or plate randomization. Only a select few studies mentioned passage numbers, use of vehicle control or conflict of interest. In conclusion, better characterization of trophoblast subtypes and a broader range of studied interventions and outcome parameters would contribute to a more complete understanding of trophoblast responses to immune stimuli. Additionally, researchers are encouraged to replicate experiments and pay close attention when setting up and writing down methodologies, in order to improve the reproducibility and translatability of their work.
期刊介绍:
Placenta publishes high-quality original articles and invited topical reviews on all aspects of human and animal placentation, and the interactions between the mother, the placenta and fetal development. Topics covered include evolution, development, genetics and epigenetics, stem cells, metabolism, transport, immunology, pathology, pharmacology, cell and molecular biology, and developmental programming. The Editors welcome studies on implantation and the endometrium, comparative placentation, the uterine and umbilical circulations, the relationship between fetal and placental development, clinical aspects of altered placental development or function, the placental membranes, the influence of paternal factors on placental development or function, and the assessment of biomarkers of placental disorders.