心房颤动消融术后的左心房阑尾封闭术

IF 96.2 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL New England Journal of Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa2408308
Oussama M Wazni, Walid I Saliba, Devi G Nair, Eloi Marijon, Boris Schmidt, Troy Hounshell, Henning Ebelt, Carsten Skurk, Saumil Oza, Chinmay Patel, Arvindh Kanagasundram, Ashish Sadhu, Sri Sundaram, Jose Osorio, George Mark, Madhukar Gupta, David B DeLurgio, Jeffrey Olson, Jens Erik Nielsen-Kudsk, Lucas V A Boersma, Jeff S Healey, Karen P Phillips, Federico M Asch, Katherine Wolski, Kristine Roy, Thomas Christen, Brad S Sutton, Kenneth M Stein, Vivek Y Reddy
{"title":"心房颤动消融术后的左心房阑尾封闭术","authors":"Oussama M Wazni, Walid I Saliba, Devi G Nair, Eloi Marijon, Boris Schmidt, Troy Hounshell, Henning Ebelt, Carsten Skurk, Saumil Oza, Chinmay Patel, Arvindh Kanagasundram, Ashish Sadhu, Sri Sundaram, Jose Osorio, George Mark, Madhukar Gupta, David B DeLurgio, Jeffrey Olson, Jens Erik Nielsen-Kudsk, Lucas V A Boersma, Jeff S Healey, Karen P Phillips, Federico M Asch, Katherine Wolski, Kristine Roy, Thomas Christen, Brad S Sutton, Kenneth M Stein, Vivek Y Reddy","doi":"10.1056/NEJMoa2408308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oral anticoagulation is recommended after ablation for atrial fibrillation among patients at high risk for stroke. Left atrial appendage closure is a mechanical alternative to anticoagulation, but data regarding its use after atrial fibrillation ablation are lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an international randomized trial involving 1600 patients with atrial fibrillation who had an elevated score (≥2 in men and ≥3 in women) on the CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc scale (range, 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating a greater risk of stroke) and who underwent catheter ablation. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo left atrial appendage closure or receive oral anticoagulation. The primary safety end point, tested for superiority, was non-procedure-related major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. The primary efficacy end point, tested for noninferiority, was a composite of death from any cause, stroke, or systemic embolism at 36 months. The secondary end point, tested for noninferiority, was major bleeding, including procedure-related bleeding, through 36 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 803 patients were assigned to undergo left atrial appendage closure, and 797 to receive anticoagulant therapy. The mean (±SD) age of the patients was 69.6±7.7 years, 34.1% of the patients were women, and the mean CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score was 3.5±1.3. At 36 months, a primary safety end-point event had occurred in 65 patients (8.5%) in the left atrial appendage closure group (device group) and in 137 patients (18.1%) in the anticoagulation group (P<0.001 for superiority); a primary efficacy end-point event had occurred in 41 patients (5.3%) and 44 patients (5.8%), respectively (P<0.001 for noninferiority); and a secondary end-point event had occurred in 3.9% and 5.0% (P<0.001 for noninferiority). Complications related to the appendage closure device or procedure occurred in 23 patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients who underwent catheter-based atrial fibrillation ablation, left atrial appendage closure was associated with a lower risk of non-procedure-related major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding than oral anticoagulation and was noninferior to oral anticoagulation with respect to a composite of death from any cause, stroke, or systemic embolism at 36 months. (Funded by Boston Scientific; OPTION ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03795298.).</p>","PeriodicalId":54725,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":96.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Left Atrial Appendage Closure after Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.\",\"authors\":\"Oussama M Wazni, Walid I Saliba, Devi G Nair, Eloi Marijon, Boris Schmidt, Troy Hounshell, Henning Ebelt, Carsten Skurk, Saumil Oza, Chinmay Patel, Arvindh Kanagasundram, Ashish Sadhu, Sri Sundaram, Jose Osorio, George Mark, Madhukar Gupta, David B DeLurgio, Jeffrey Olson, Jens Erik Nielsen-Kudsk, Lucas V A Boersma, Jeff S Healey, Karen P Phillips, Federico M Asch, Katherine Wolski, Kristine Roy, Thomas Christen, Brad S Sutton, Kenneth M Stein, Vivek Y Reddy\",\"doi\":\"10.1056/NEJMoa2408308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oral anticoagulation is recommended after ablation for atrial fibrillation among patients at high risk for stroke. Left atrial appendage closure is a mechanical alternative to anticoagulation, but data regarding its use after atrial fibrillation ablation are lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an international randomized trial involving 1600 patients with atrial fibrillation who had an elevated score (≥2 in men and ≥3 in women) on the CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc scale (range, 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating a greater risk of stroke) and who underwent catheter ablation. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo left atrial appendage closure or receive oral anticoagulation. The primary safety end point, tested for superiority, was non-procedure-related major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. The primary efficacy end point, tested for noninferiority, was a composite of death from any cause, stroke, or systemic embolism at 36 months. The secondary end point, tested for noninferiority, was major bleeding, including procedure-related bleeding, through 36 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 803 patients were assigned to undergo left atrial appendage closure, and 797 to receive anticoagulant therapy. The mean (±SD) age of the patients was 69.6±7.7 years, 34.1% of the patients were women, and the mean CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score was 3.5±1.3. At 36 months, a primary safety end-point event had occurred in 65 patients (8.5%) in the left atrial appendage closure group (device group) and in 137 patients (18.1%) in the anticoagulation group (P<0.001 for superiority); a primary efficacy end-point event had occurred in 41 patients (5.3%) and 44 patients (5.8%), respectively (P<0.001 for noninferiority); and a secondary end-point event had occurred in 3.9% and 5.0% (P<0.001 for noninferiority). Complications related to the appendage closure device or procedure occurred in 23 patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients who underwent catheter-based atrial fibrillation ablation, left atrial appendage closure was associated with a lower risk of non-procedure-related major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding than oral anticoagulation and was noninferior to oral anticoagulation with respect to a composite of death from any cause, stroke, or systemic embolism at 36 months. (Funded by Boston Scientific; OPTION ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03795298.).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New England Journal of Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":96.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New England Journal of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2408308\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New England Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2408308","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:建议中风高危患者在房颤消融术后口服抗凝药。左心房阑尾关闭术是抗凝治疗的一种机械替代方法,但目前还缺乏有关心房颤动消融术后使用该方法的数据:我们进行了一项国际随机试验,涉及 1600 名在 CHA2DS2-VASc 量表中得分较高(男性≥2 分,女性≥3 分)并接受导管消融术的心房颤动患者。患者按 1:1 的比例随机分配接受左心房阑尾关闭术或口服抗凝药。检验优劣的主要安全性终点是非手术相关大出血或临床相关非大出血。主要疗效终点是在36个月内因任何原因死亡、中风或全身性栓塞的综合指数,以检验其是否具有优越性。次要疗效终点为36个月内的大出血(包括手术相关出血),以检验疗效的非劣效性:共有803名患者被分配接受左心房阑尾关闭术,797名患者接受抗凝治疗。患者的平均年龄(±SD)为 69.6±7.7 岁,34.1% 的患者为女性,平均 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分为 3.5±1.3。在36个月时,左心房阑尾闭合组(器械组)有65名患者(8.5%)发生了主要安全终点事件,抗凝组(PC组)有137名患者(18.1%)发生了主要安全终点事件:在接受基于导管的心房颤动消融术的患者中,与口服抗凝药相比,左心房阑尾关闭术与非手术相关的大出血或临床相关的非大出血风险更低,而且在36个月时因任何原因死亡、中风或全身性栓塞的复合风险方面,左心房阑尾关闭术不劣于口服抗凝药。(由波士顿科学公司资助;OPTION ClinicalTrials.gov 编号为 NCT03795298)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Left Atrial Appendage Closure after Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.

Background: Oral anticoagulation is recommended after ablation for atrial fibrillation among patients at high risk for stroke. Left atrial appendage closure is a mechanical alternative to anticoagulation, but data regarding its use after atrial fibrillation ablation are lacking.

Methods: We conducted an international randomized trial involving 1600 patients with atrial fibrillation who had an elevated score (≥2 in men and ≥3 in women) on the CHA2DS2-VASc scale (range, 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating a greater risk of stroke) and who underwent catheter ablation. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo left atrial appendage closure or receive oral anticoagulation. The primary safety end point, tested for superiority, was non-procedure-related major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. The primary efficacy end point, tested for noninferiority, was a composite of death from any cause, stroke, or systemic embolism at 36 months. The secondary end point, tested for noninferiority, was major bleeding, including procedure-related bleeding, through 36 months.

Results: A total of 803 patients were assigned to undergo left atrial appendage closure, and 797 to receive anticoagulant therapy. The mean (±SD) age of the patients was 69.6±7.7 years, 34.1% of the patients were women, and the mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.5±1.3. At 36 months, a primary safety end-point event had occurred in 65 patients (8.5%) in the left atrial appendage closure group (device group) and in 137 patients (18.1%) in the anticoagulation group (P<0.001 for superiority); a primary efficacy end-point event had occurred in 41 patients (5.3%) and 44 patients (5.8%), respectively (P<0.001 for noninferiority); and a secondary end-point event had occurred in 3.9% and 5.0% (P<0.001 for noninferiority). Complications related to the appendage closure device or procedure occurred in 23 patients.

Conclusions: Among patients who underwent catheter-based atrial fibrillation ablation, left atrial appendage closure was associated with a lower risk of non-procedure-related major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding than oral anticoagulation and was noninferior to oral anticoagulation with respect to a composite of death from any cause, stroke, or systemic embolism at 36 months. (Funded by Boston Scientific; OPTION ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03795298.).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New England Journal of Medicine
New England Journal of Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
145.40
自引率
0.60%
发文量
1839
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) stands as the foremost medical journal and website worldwide. With an impressive history spanning over two centuries, NEJM boasts a consistent publication of superb, peer-reviewed research and engaging clinical content. Our primary objective revolves around delivering high-caliber information and findings at the juncture of biomedical science and clinical practice. We strive to present this knowledge in formats that are not only comprehensible but also hold practical value, effectively influencing healthcare practices and ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Antibiotic Treatment for 7 versus 14 Days in Patients with Bloodstream Infections. Oral Infigratinib Therapy in Children with Achondroplasia. Phase 1 Study of AAV9.LAMP2B Gene Therapy in Danon Disease. NEJM at AHA - Phase 1 Study of AAV9.LAMP2B Gene Therapy in Danon Disease. Colchicine in Acute Myocardial Infarction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1