CTCAE 与患者报告的乳腺放射性皮炎症状评分的相关性。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Supportive Care in Cancer Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1007/s00520-024-09018-9
Thenugaa Rajeswaran, Milena Gojsevic, Liying Zhang, Samantha K F Kennedy, Irene Karam, Keyue Ding, Patries Herst, Henry Wong, Jennifer Y Y Kwan, Amir H Safavi, Jacqueline Lam, Silvana Spadafora, Natalie Walde, Katherine Carothers, Francois Gallant, Tara Behroozian, Emily Lam, Edward Chow
{"title":"CTCAE 与患者报告的乳腺放射性皮炎症状评分的相关性。","authors":"Thenugaa Rajeswaran, Milena Gojsevic, Liying Zhang, Samantha K F Kennedy, Irene Karam, Keyue Ding, Patries Herst, Henry Wong, Jennifer Y Y Kwan, Amir H Safavi, Jacqueline Lam, Silvana Spadafora, Natalie Walde, Katherine Carothers, Francois Gallant, Tara Behroozian, Emily Lam, Edward Chow","doi":"10.1007/s00520-024-09018-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Clinicians use the CTCAE scale to grade radiation dermatitis (RD) based on edema, erythema, and desquamation. The purpose of this study was to correlate the CTCAE scores with the severity of patient-reported symptoms using a skin symptom assessment (SSA) and the Radiation-Induced Skin Reaction Assessment Scale (RISRAS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial involving 376 patients receiving Mepitel Film or standard-of-care for RD prophylaxis. The highest symptom categories for SSA and patient-component RISRAS assessments were selected from all time points, and a summary analysis and Spearman correlation coefficient was calculated for patients with CTCAE Grades 0, 1, 2, 3, and Grade 2/3, respectively. Analyses were conducted across all patients, within each treatment arm, and between arms in patients with only Grade 2 or 3 toxicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Weak correlations between CTCAE scores and all patient-reported skin symptoms were found across the entire cohort and each treatment arm (p < 0.05). Patients with Grade 2 (n = 72) and Grade 3 RD (n = 24) reported similar rates of patient-reported moderate-to-severe skin symptoms (11-72% vs 14-79%), with no significant difference in rates of individual moderate-to-severe symptom between these cohorts (p > 0.05). Between treatment arms, rates of patient-reported moderate-to-severe scores were similar for most symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CTCAE RD scores are weakly correlated with patient-reported skin symptoms and cannot distinguish between patients with severe patient-reported outcomes. Clinicians should consider the limitations of CTCAE grading and incorporate patient-reported outcomes within clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"32 12","pages":"801"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation of CTCAE and patient-reported breast radiation dermatitis symptom scores.\",\"authors\":\"Thenugaa Rajeswaran, Milena Gojsevic, Liying Zhang, Samantha K F Kennedy, Irene Karam, Keyue Ding, Patries Herst, Henry Wong, Jennifer Y Y Kwan, Amir H Safavi, Jacqueline Lam, Silvana Spadafora, Natalie Walde, Katherine Carothers, Francois Gallant, Tara Behroozian, Emily Lam, Edward Chow\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00520-024-09018-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Clinicians use the CTCAE scale to grade radiation dermatitis (RD) based on edema, erythema, and desquamation. The purpose of this study was to correlate the CTCAE scores with the severity of patient-reported symptoms using a skin symptom assessment (SSA) and the Radiation-Induced Skin Reaction Assessment Scale (RISRAS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial involving 376 patients receiving Mepitel Film or standard-of-care for RD prophylaxis. The highest symptom categories for SSA and patient-component RISRAS assessments were selected from all time points, and a summary analysis and Spearman correlation coefficient was calculated for patients with CTCAE Grades 0, 1, 2, 3, and Grade 2/3, respectively. Analyses were conducted across all patients, within each treatment arm, and between arms in patients with only Grade 2 or 3 toxicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Weak correlations between CTCAE scores and all patient-reported skin symptoms were found across the entire cohort and each treatment arm (p < 0.05). Patients with Grade 2 (n = 72) and Grade 3 RD (n = 24) reported similar rates of patient-reported moderate-to-severe skin symptoms (11-72% vs 14-79%), with no significant difference in rates of individual moderate-to-severe symptom between these cohorts (p > 0.05). Between treatment arms, rates of patient-reported moderate-to-severe scores were similar for most symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CTCAE RD scores are weakly correlated with patient-reported skin symptoms and cannot distinguish between patients with severe patient-reported outcomes. Clinicians should consider the limitations of CTCAE grading and incorporate patient-reported outcomes within clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Supportive Care in Cancer\",\"volume\":\"32 12\",\"pages\":\"801\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Supportive Care in Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-09018-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-09018-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:临床医生使用 CTCAE 量表根据水肿、红斑和脱屑对放射性皮炎 (RD) 进行分级。本研究的目的是使用皮肤症状评估(SSA)和辐射诱发皮肤反应评估量表(RISRAS)将 CTCAE 评分与患者报告的症状严重程度相关联:这是一项随机对照试验的二次分析,共有 376 名患者接受了美皮特胶片或标准疗法的 RD 预防治疗。从所有时间点中选取了SSA和患者成分RISRAS评估的最高症状类别,分别对CTCAE分级为0、1、2、3级和2/3级的患者进行了汇总分析并计算了斯皮尔曼相关系数。对所有患者、各治疗组内部以及各治疗组之间仅有 2 级或 3 级毒性的患者进行了分析:结果:在整个队列和每个治疗组中发现,CTCAE 评分与患者报告的所有皮肤症状之间存在微弱的相关性(P 0.05)。各治疗组之间,患者报告的大多数症状的中度至重度评分率相似:结论:CTCAE RD评分与患者报告的皮肤症状相关性较弱,无法区分患者报告的严重后果。临床医生应考虑到 CTCAE 分级的局限性,并将患者报告的结果纳入临床实践中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Correlation of CTCAE and patient-reported breast radiation dermatitis symptom scores.

Background and purpose: Clinicians use the CTCAE scale to grade radiation dermatitis (RD) based on edema, erythema, and desquamation. The purpose of this study was to correlate the CTCAE scores with the severity of patient-reported symptoms using a skin symptom assessment (SSA) and the Radiation-Induced Skin Reaction Assessment Scale (RISRAS).

Materials and methods: This is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial involving 376 patients receiving Mepitel Film or standard-of-care for RD prophylaxis. The highest symptom categories for SSA and patient-component RISRAS assessments were selected from all time points, and a summary analysis and Spearman correlation coefficient was calculated for patients with CTCAE Grades 0, 1, 2, 3, and Grade 2/3, respectively. Analyses were conducted across all patients, within each treatment arm, and between arms in patients with only Grade 2 or 3 toxicity.

Results: Weak correlations between CTCAE scores and all patient-reported skin symptoms were found across the entire cohort and each treatment arm (p < 0.05). Patients with Grade 2 (n = 72) and Grade 3 RD (n = 24) reported similar rates of patient-reported moderate-to-severe skin symptoms (11-72% vs 14-79%), with no significant difference in rates of individual moderate-to-severe symptom between these cohorts (p > 0.05). Between treatment arms, rates of patient-reported moderate-to-severe scores were similar for most symptoms.

Conclusion: CTCAE RD scores are weakly correlated with patient-reported skin symptoms and cannot distinguish between patients with severe patient-reported outcomes. Clinicians should consider the limitations of CTCAE grading and incorporate patient-reported outcomes within clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
期刊最新文献
Oral foci of infection and their relationship with hospital stay after haematopoietic cell transplantation. COVID-19 testing and financial toxicity in cancer survivors. Letter to the editor to "Outcomes of parenteral nutrition in patients with advanced cancer and malignant bowel obstruction". Skeletal muscle mass, strength, and physical performance gains are similar between healthy postmenopausal women and postmenopausal breast cancer survivors after 12 weeks of resistance exercise training. Comment "Effectiveness of e-health interventions for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a systematic review and meta-analysis".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1