道路交通事故对面部骨折造成的负担:154 185 名患者的全国趋势、伤害模式和差异。

IF 0.8 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1177/19433875241272440
Carol Y Wang, Daniel Y Kwon, Olachi Oleru, Nargiz Seyidova, Peter E Shamamian, Keisha E Montalmant, Alex Sarosi, Peter J Taub
{"title":"道路交通事故对面部骨折造成的负担:154 185 名患者的全国趋势、伤害模式和差异。","authors":"Carol Y Wang, Daniel Y Kwon, Olachi Oleru, Nargiz Seyidova, Peter E Shamamian, Keisha E Montalmant, Alex Sarosi, Peter J Taub","doi":"10.1177/19433875241272440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>National database study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Road traffic accidents (RTAs) are a common and challenging cause of facial fractures in the United States. The present study sought to utilize the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS) to investigate national trends, injury patterns and disparities in facial fractures secondary to RTAs. To date, this is the first study to do so.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients with primary facial fractures secondary to RTAs using the 2018-2021 HCUP-NIS. Patients were classified into the RTA and non-RTA group. Demographics, injury patterns, and inpatient outcomes were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 154,185 primary facial fractures were identified, of which 17% (n = 26,115) were associated with RTAs. RTAs commonly involved cars (41%), followed by motorcycles (15%), pedestrians (11%), and bicyclists (10%). The RTA group was younger (34% vs 24% < 25 years, <i>P</i> < .01) and more frequently Hispanic (18% vs 15%, <i>P</i> < .01). The most common fracture types were mandibular (23%), frontal (14%), and orbital fractures (14%). The RTA group was 50% more likely to have multiple facial fractures (OR = 1.5, <i>P</i> < .01). The RTA group had a longer length of stay (5.3 vs 4.0 days, <i>P</i> < .01), admission charge ($127,932 vs $79,414, <i>P</i> < .01), and mortality rate (1.9% vs 1.4%, <i>P</i> < .01) than the non-RTA group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present findings provide valuable insights, informing early involvement of craniofacial surgeons for the assessment of combination facial fractures and tailored treatment approaches for RTA patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":46447,"journal":{"name":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","volume":" ","pages":"19433875241272440"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562984/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Burden of Road Traffic Accidents on Facial Fractures: National Trends, Injury Patterns, and Disparities in 154,185 Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Carol Y Wang, Daniel Y Kwon, Olachi Oleru, Nargiz Seyidova, Peter E Shamamian, Keisha E Montalmant, Alex Sarosi, Peter J Taub\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19433875241272440\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>National database study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Road traffic accidents (RTAs) are a common and challenging cause of facial fractures in the United States. The present study sought to utilize the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS) to investigate national trends, injury patterns and disparities in facial fractures secondary to RTAs. To date, this is the first study to do so.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients with primary facial fractures secondary to RTAs using the 2018-2021 HCUP-NIS. Patients were classified into the RTA and non-RTA group. Demographics, injury patterns, and inpatient outcomes were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 154,185 primary facial fractures were identified, of which 17% (n = 26,115) were associated with RTAs. RTAs commonly involved cars (41%), followed by motorcycles (15%), pedestrians (11%), and bicyclists (10%). The RTA group was younger (34% vs 24% < 25 years, <i>P</i> < .01) and more frequently Hispanic (18% vs 15%, <i>P</i> < .01). The most common fracture types were mandibular (23%), frontal (14%), and orbital fractures (14%). The RTA group was 50% more likely to have multiple facial fractures (OR = 1.5, <i>P</i> < .01). The RTA group had a longer length of stay (5.3 vs 4.0 days, <i>P</i> < .01), admission charge ($127,932 vs $79,414, <i>P</i> < .01), and mortality rate (1.9% vs 1.4%, <i>P</i> < .01) than the non-RTA group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present findings provide valuable insights, informing early involvement of craniofacial surgeons for the assessment of combination facial fractures and tailored treatment approaches for RTA patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"19433875241272440\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562984/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19433875241272440\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19433875241272440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计全国数据库研究:在美国,道路交通事故(RTA)是导致面部骨折的一个常见且具有挑战性的原因。本研究试图利用医疗成本与利用项目全国住院病人样本(HCUP-NIS)来调查继发于道路交通事故的面部骨折的全国趋势、伤害模式和差异。迄今为止,这是第一项此类研究:使用 2018-2021 年 HCUP-NIS 对继发于 RTA 的原发性面部骨折患者进行了回顾性分析。患者被分为 RTA 组和非 RTA 组。对人口统计学、损伤模式和住院结果进行了比较:共发现 154 185 例原发性面部骨折,其中 17% (n = 26 115)与 RTA 相关。快速交通事故通常涉及汽车(41%),其次是摩托车(15%)、行人(11%)和骑自行车者(10%)。RTA 组的年龄更小(34% 对 24% 小于 25 岁,P < .01),更多是西班牙裔(18% 对 15%,P < .01)。最常见的骨折类型是下颌骨骨折(23%)、额骨骨折(14%)和眼眶骨折(14%)。RTA 组发生多发性面部骨折的可能性高出 50%(OR = 1.5,P < .01)。RTA组的住院时间(5.3天 vs 4.0天,P < .01)、入院费用(127,932美元 vs 79,414美元,P < .01)和死亡率(1.9% vs 1.4%,P < .01)均长于非RTA组:本研究结果提供了宝贵的见解,有助于颅颌面外科医生及早参与面部合并骨折的评估,并为 RTA 患者提供量身定制的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Burden of Road Traffic Accidents on Facial Fractures: National Trends, Injury Patterns, and Disparities in 154,185 Patients.

Study design: National database study.

Objective: Road traffic accidents (RTAs) are a common and challenging cause of facial fractures in the United States. The present study sought to utilize the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS) to investigate national trends, injury patterns and disparities in facial fractures secondary to RTAs. To date, this is the first study to do so.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients with primary facial fractures secondary to RTAs using the 2018-2021 HCUP-NIS. Patients were classified into the RTA and non-RTA group. Demographics, injury patterns, and inpatient outcomes were compared.

Results: In total, 154,185 primary facial fractures were identified, of which 17% (n = 26,115) were associated with RTAs. RTAs commonly involved cars (41%), followed by motorcycles (15%), pedestrians (11%), and bicyclists (10%). The RTA group was younger (34% vs 24% < 25 years, P < .01) and more frequently Hispanic (18% vs 15%, P < .01). The most common fracture types were mandibular (23%), frontal (14%), and orbital fractures (14%). The RTA group was 50% more likely to have multiple facial fractures (OR = 1.5, P < .01). The RTA group had a longer length of stay (5.3 vs 4.0 days, P < .01), admission charge ($127,932 vs $79,414, P < .01), and mortality rate (1.9% vs 1.4%, P < .01) than the non-RTA group.

Conclusions: The present findings provide valuable insights, informing early involvement of craniofacial surgeons for the assessment of combination facial fractures and tailored treatment approaches for RTA patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Guidelines for Orbital Defect Assessment and Patient-Specific Implant Design: Introducing OA2 (Orbital Assessment Algorithm). Moving Forward: The Last Subscription Issue and the Dawn of Open Access. Opportunity Cost of Surgical Management of Craniomaxillofacial Trauma: A Longitudinal Study. Does More Invasive Surgery Result in Higher Patient Satisfaction? A Long-Term Follow-Up of 136 Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures. Microvascular Reconstructions in Elderly Patients With Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma - Too Old for Surgical Treatment?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1