同时使用酒精和大麻的近端前因和急性结果:日常和事件层面研究的系统回顾。

IF 3 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.) Pub Date : 2024-11-17 DOI:10.1111/acer.15484
Kyra N Farrelly, Tahmina Amini, Sophie G Coelho, Nicolle Fox, Nicole Dimitrova, Christian S Hendershot, Jeffrey D Wardell
{"title":"同时使用酒精和大麻的近端前因和急性结果:日常和事件层面研究的系统回顾。","authors":"Kyra N Farrelly, Tahmina Amini, Sophie G Coelho, Nicolle Fox, Nicole Dimitrova, Christian S Hendershot, Jeffrey D Wardell","doi":"10.1111/acer.15484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many studies have revealed that individuals who engage in simultaneous use of alcohol and cannabis report elevated substance-related consequences relative to those who use only alcohol or cannabis; however, evidence from emerging studies examining within-person differences across simultaneous use and single substance use occasions is less consistent. This systematic review aimed to synthesize findings from existing day- and event-level studies of within-person differences in the proximal antecedents and acute outcomes associated with simultaneous use versus single substance use episodes. Our search strategy revealed 30 eligible articles. Two categories of antecedents (i.e., internal [e.g., motives] and external [e.g., social context]) and three categories of outcomes (i.e., consumption behavior, general positive and negative consequences, and specific consequences) were identified. The current literature consistently suggests that greater day- or event-level social and enhancement motives, as well as being in a social context, predict greater likelihood of engaging in simultaneous use compared with alcohol- or cannabis-only use. However, there was heterogeneity in findings regarding the role of other person-level antecedents. Further, while most evidence pointed to heavier alcohol consumption on simultaneous use occasions versus alcohol-only occasions, findings for elevations in acute negative and positive substance-related consequences on simultaneous use versus single substance use occasions were mixed. Additionally, four studies found that increased consequences on simultaneous use occasions depended on the level of alcohol consumed. This review identifies several antecedents for simultaneous use events but suggests that simultaneous use occasions are not always associated with more acute harms than single substance use occasions. Given the extent to which the current literature is mixed, this review emphasizes the importance of methodological improvements and future research examining the mechanisms linking simultaneous use with substance-related consequences to help reconcile findings across within-person and between-person studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":72145,"journal":{"name":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proximal antecedents and acute outcomes of simultaneous alcohol and cannabis use: Systematic review of daily- and event-level studies.\",\"authors\":\"Kyra N Farrelly, Tahmina Amini, Sophie G Coelho, Nicolle Fox, Nicole Dimitrova, Christian S Hendershot, Jeffrey D Wardell\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/acer.15484\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Many studies have revealed that individuals who engage in simultaneous use of alcohol and cannabis report elevated substance-related consequences relative to those who use only alcohol or cannabis; however, evidence from emerging studies examining within-person differences across simultaneous use and single substance use occasions is less consistent. This systematic review aimed to synthesize findings from existing day- and event-level studies of within-person differences in the proximal antecedents and acute outcomes associated with simultaneous use versus single substance use episodes. Our search strategy revealed 30 eligible articles. Two categories of antecedents (i.e., internal [e.g., motives] and external [e.g., social context]) and three categories of outcomes (i.e., consumption behavior, general positive and negative consequences, and specific consequences) were identified. The current literature consistently suggests that greater day- or event-level social and enhancement motives, as well as being in a social context, predict greater likelihood of engaging in simultaneous use compared with alcohol- or cannabis-only use. However, there was heterogeneity in findings regarding the role of other person-level antecedents. Further, while most evidence pointed to heavier alcohol consumption on simultaneous use occasions versus alcohol-only occasions, findings for elevations in acute negative and positive substance-related consequences on simultaneous use versus single substance use occasions were mixed. Additionally, four studies found that increased consequences on simultaneous use occasions depended on the level of alcohol consumed. This review identifies several antecedents for simultaneous use events but suggests that simultaneous use occasions are not always associated with more acute harms than single substance use occasions. Given the extent to which the current literature is mixed, this review emphasizes the importance of methodological improvements and future research examining the mechanisms linking simultaneous use with substance-related consequences to help reconcile findings across within-person and between-person studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.15484\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.15484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多研究表明,与只使用酒精或大麻的人相比,同时使用酒精和大麻的人所报告的药物相关后果更高;然而,新出现的研究中对同时使用和单一药物使用情况下的人体内差异的研究证据却不那么一致。本系统性综述旨在综合现有的日和事件层面的研究结果,这些研究针对的是与同时使用和单次使用药物事件相关的近端前因后果和急性后果的人内差异。我们的搜索策略发现了 30 篇符合条件的文章。确定了两类前因(即内部[如动机]和外部[如社会环境])和三类结果(即消费行为、一般积极和消极后果以及特定后果)。目前的文献一致表明,与只饮酒或只吸食大麻相比,更强烈的日常或事件层面的社交和提升动机,以及处于社交环境中,预示着更有可能同时吸食大麻。不过,关于其他个人层面的前因的作用,研究结果存在差异。此外,虽然大多数证据表明,同时使用与只使用酒精的情况相比,酒精消费更多,但同时使用与只使用一种物质的情况相比,与物质相关的急性消极和积极后果的增加情况却不尽相同。此外,有四项研究发现,同时饮酒场合后果的增加取决于饮酒量。本综述确定了同时使用事件的几种前因,但表明同时使用事件并不总是比单一物质使用事件造成更严重的危害。鉴于目前的文献参差不齐,本综述强调了改进方法和未来研究的重要性,即研究同时使用与药物相关后果的关联机制,以帮助协调人内研究和人际研究的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Proximal antecedents and acute outcomes of simultaneous alcohol and cannabis use: Systematic review of daily- and event-level studies.

Many studies have revealed that individuals who engage in simultaneous use of alcohol and cannabis report elevated substance-related consequences relative to those who use only alcohol or cannabis; however, evidence from emerging studies examining within-person differences across simultaneous use and single substance use occasions is less consistent. This systematic review aimed to synthesize findings from existing day- and event-level studies of within-person differences in the proximal antecedents and acute outcomes associated with simultaneous use versus single substance use episodes. Our search strategy revealed 30 eligible articles. Two categories of antecedents (i.e., internal [e.g., motives] and external [e.g., social context]) and three categories of outcomes (i.e., consumption behavior, general positive and negative consequences, and specific consequences) were identified. The current literature consistently suggests that greater day- or event-level social and enhancement motives, as well as being in a social context, predict greater likelihood of engaging in simultaneous use compared with alcohol- or cannabis-only use. However, there was heterogeneity in findings regarding the role of other person-level antecedents. Further, while most evidence pointed to heavier alcohol consumption on simultaneous use occasions versus alcohol-only occasions, findings for elevations in acute negative and positive substance-related consequences on simultaneous use versus single substance use occasions were mixed. Additionally, four studies found that increased consequences on simultaneous use occasions depended on the level of alcohol consumed. This review identifies several antecedents for simultaneous use events but suggests that simultaneous use occasions are not always associated with more acute harms than single substance use occasions. Given the extent to which the current literature is mixed, this review emphasizes the importance of methodological improvements and future research examining the mechanisms linking simultaneous use with substance-related consequences to help reconcile findings across within-person and between-person studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Alcohol use and cannabis craving in daily life: Sex differences and associations among young adults. Comparing rates of agreement between different diagnostic criteria for fetal alcohol spectrum disorder: A systematic review. Impact of early alcohol consumption on adolescent development: Commentary on a longitudinal study conducted by Ferariu et al. (2024). Pain prospectively predicts alcohol use disorder among people living with HIV: A commentary on Palfai et al. (2024). An online assessment of ready-to-drink alcohol products in Fort Worth, Texas: Which are the least expensive brands?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1