澳大利亚产前护理中的共同决策和体重指数:探索性 OPTION12 评估。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Expectations Pub Date : 2024-11-17 DOI:10.1111/hex.70107
Madeline Hawke, Linda Sweet, Julie Considine
{"title":"澳大利亚产前护理中的共同决策和体重指数:探索性 OPTION12 评估。","authors":"Madeline Hawke,&nbsp;Linda Sweet,&nbsp;Julie Considine","doi":"10.1111/hex.70107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Shared decision-making is recommended as a person-centred approach to decision-making in antenatal care. Little is known about the implementation of shared decision-making in antenatal care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>An exploratory study to understand how shared decision-making is implemented in antenatal clinics and whether body mass index influences maternity clinicians’ use of shared decision-making when providing antenatal care for women.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-six antenatal clinic consultations were audio-recorded with maternity clinicians and women with body mass index ≥ 35 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, and a comparison group of women with body mass index 18.5–24.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Data were analysed quantitatively using the OPTION12 scale. Narrative case studies are presented to compare shared decision-making behaviour related to induction of labour.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twelve clinicians and 26 pregnant women were recruited to the study. The total scores ranged from 0 to 24, with a mean score of 9 and a median of 9.5 indicating low implementation of shared decision-making by clinicians and limited involvement of women in decision-making. No difference was observed in OPTION12 scores in decision-making for women by body mass index.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study suggests that shared decision-making is limited in the antenatal clinic setting for all women, regardless of body mass index. Further research is required to confirm the findings of this exploratory study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>The perspectives of women with body mass index ≥ 35 kg/m<sup>2</sup> informed many aspects of this study including the language/terminology adopted by researchers. A consumer group reviewed the language used in the study materials, to ensure readability and avoidance of stigmatising terminology.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"27 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70107","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shared Decision-Making and Body Mass Index in Australian Antenatal Care: An Exploratory OPTION12 Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Madeline Hawke,&nbsp;Linda Sweet,&nbsp;Julie Considine\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hex.70107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Shared decision-making is recommended as a person-centred approach to decision-making in antenatal care. Little is known about the implementation of shared decision-making in antenatal care.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>An exploratory study to understand how shared decision-making is implemented in antenatal clinics and whether body mass index influences maternity clinicians’ use of shared decision-making when providing antenatal care for women.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Twenty-six antenatal clinic consultations were audio-recorded with maternity clinicians and women with body mass index ≥ 35 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, and a comparison group of women with body mass index 18.5–24.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Data were analysed quantitatively using the OPTION12 scale. Narrative case studies are presented to compare shared decision-making behaviour related to induction of labour.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Twelve clinicians and 26 pregnant women were recruited to the study. The total scores ranged from 0 to 24, with a mean score of 9 and a median of 9.5 indicating low implementation of shared decision-making by clinicians and limited involvement of women in decision-making. No difference was observed in OPTION12 scores in decision-making for women by body mass index.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study suggests that shared decision-making is limited in the antenatal clinic setting for all women, regardless of body mass index. Further research is required to confirm the findings of this exploratory study.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\\n \\n <p>The perspectives of women with body mass index ≥ 35 kg/m<sup>2</sup> informed many aspects of this study including the language/terminology adopted by researchers. A consumer group reviewed the language used in the study materials, to ensure readability and avoidance of stigmatising terminology.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Expectations\",\"volume\":\"27 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70107\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Expectations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70107\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70107","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:共同决策是产前护理中一种以人为本的决策方法。但人们对产前护理中共同决策的实施情况知之甚少:一项探索性研究旨在了解产前门诊如何实施共同决策,以及体重指数是否会影响产科临床医生在为产妇提供产前护理时使用共同决策:对产科临床医生和体重指数≥35 kg/m2的产妇以及体重指数为18.5-24.9 kg/m2的产妇进行了26次产前咨询录音。采用 OPTION12 量表对数据进行定量分析。通过叙述性案例研究来比较与引产相关的共同决策行为:研究共招募了 12 名临床医生和 26 名孕妇。总分从 0 分到 24 分不等,平均分为 9 分,中位数为 9.5 分,表明临床医生很少实施共同决策,妇女参与决策的程度有限。根据体重指数的不同,妇女在决策过程中的 OPTION12 得分也没有差异:本研究表明,在产前诊所环境中,无论身体质量指数如何,所有妇女的共同决策都很有限。需要进一步研究来证实这项探索性研究的结果:患者或公众的贡献:体重指数≥ 35 kg/m2 的妇女的观点为本研究提供了许多信息,包括研究人员采用的语言/术语。一个消费者团体对研究材料中使用的语言进行了审查,以确保可读性并避免使用污名化术语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Shared Decision-Making and Body Mass Index in Australian Antenatal Care: An Exploratory OPTION12 Evaluation

Background

Shared decision-making is recommended as a person-centred approach to decision-making in antenatal care. Little is known about the implementation of shared decision-making in antenatal care.

Objective

An exploratory study to understand how shared decision-making is implemented in antenatal clinics and whether body mass index influences maternity clinicians’ use of shared decision-making when providing antenatal care for women.

Methods

Twenty-six antenatal clinic consultations were audio-recorded with maternity clinicians and women with body mass index ≥ 35 kg/m2, and a comparison group of women with body mass index 18.5–24.9 kg/m2. Data were analysed quantitatively using the OPTION12 scale. Narrative case studies are presented to compare shared decision-making behaviour related to induction of labour.

Results

Twelve clinicians and 26 pregnant women were recruited to the study. The total scores ranged from 0 to 24, with a mean score of 9 and a median of 9.5 indicating low implementation of shared decision-making by clinicians and limited involvement of women in decision-making. No difference was observed in OPTION12 scores in decision-making for women by body mass index.

Conclusion

This study suggests that shared decision-making is limited in the antenatal clinic setting for all women, regardless of body mass index. Further research is required to confirm the findings of this exploratory study.

Patient or Public Contribution

The perspectives of women with body mass index ≥ 35 kg/m2 informed many aspects of this study including the language/terminology adopted by researchers. A consumer group reviewed the language used in the study materials, to ensure readability and avoidance of stigmatising terminology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
期刊最新文献
Exploring Barriers and Facilitators to Patients and Members of the Public Contributing to Rapid Health Technology Assessments for NICE: A Qualitative Study. 'The Letter Says I May or May Not Be Eligible… It Is a Big Doubt and Frustrating:' A Qualitative Study on Barriers and Facilitators to Children's Oral Healthcare From the Perspective of Karen Refugee Parents in Victoria. Beyond the Queue: Exploring Waiting Practices in the Stories of Patients With Breast Cancer Consumer Involvement in the Design and Development of Medication Safety Interventions or Services in Primary Care: A Scoping Review Shared Decision-Making and Body Mass Index in Australian Antenatal Care: An Exploratory OPTION12 Evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1